在一项随机的CAO/ARO/AIO-12 2期试验中,局部晚期直肠癌患者接受两组总新辅助治疗后的生活质量

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Rebekka Kosmala, Adriana Salazar Hammann, Patrick Paulus, Marcus Zimmermann, Andrea Wittig-Sauerwein, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Michael Ghadimi, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Markus Diefenhardt, Emmanouil Fokas, Claus Rödel, Bülent Polat
{"title":"在一项随机的CAO/ARO/AIO-12 2期试验中,局部晚期直肠癌患者接受两组总新辅助治疗后的生活质量","authors":"Rebekka Kosmala, Adriana Salazar Hammann, Patrick Paulus, Marcus Zimmermann, Andrea Wittig-Sauerwein, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Michael Ghadimi, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Markus Diefenhardt, Emmanouil Fokas, Claus Rödel, Bülent Polat","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>In a multicenter phase 2 trial the sequence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CT) prior to total mesorectal excision demonstrated higher pathological complete response rates than induction CT before CRT. Here, we present findings on quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with rectal carcinoma (cT3-4 cN0-2) were randomly assigned to group A (CT+CRT; N=156) or group B (CRT+CT; N=150). This is a secondary QoL analysis (EORTC QLQ-C30+CR29, Wexner) before and during treatment and of disease-free patients during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov identifier: XXXX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, completed questionnaires were available for 86% (N=134/156; group A) and 89% (N=133/150; group B) of participants, with availability decreasing to 73% versus 64% at 1 year, 61% versus 59% at 2 years, and 51% versus 47% at 3 years. Global health status remained stable in both groups (range 0-100) with baseline scores of 65.2 (mean, SD=21.5; N=133; group A) and 64.7 (SD=23.2; N=131; group B) and with scores of 67.6 (SD=18.4; N=52) and 65.4 (SD=22.2; N=46), respectively, at 3 years. No statistically or clinically relevant differences were observed between groups in any QoL scale upon treatment completion or during follow-up. Both groups experienced declines in role functioning, body image, male impotence, and stool incontinence (Wexner), which did not fully recover over the follow-up period. Rectal blood/mucus discharge and anxiety improved during treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QoL did not differ between the two total neoadjuvant treatment sequences. QoL domains with long lasting deterioration may serve as endpoints in future studies focused on organ preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life after two sequences of total neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the randomized CAO/ARO/AIO-12 phase 2 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rebekka Kosmala, Adriana Salazar Hammann, Patrick Paulus, Marcus Zimmermann, Andrea Wittig-Sauerwein, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Michael Ghadimi, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Markus Diefenhardt, Emmanouil Fokas, Claus Rödel, Bülent Polat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.05.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>In a multicenter phase 2 trial the sequence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CT) prior to total mesorectal excision demonstrated higher pathological complete response rates than induction CT before CRT. Here, we present findings on quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with rectal carcinoma (cT3-4 cN0-2) were randomly assigned to group A (CT+CRT; N=156) or group B (CRT+CT; N=150). This is a secondary QoL analysis (EORTC QLQ-C30+CR29, Wexner) before and during treatment and of disease-free patients during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov identifier: XXXX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, completed questionnaires were available for 86% (N=134/156; group A) and 89% (N=133/150; group B) of participants, with availability decreasing to 73% versus 64% at 1 year, 61% versus 59% at 2 years, and 51% versus 47% at 3 years. Global health status remained stable in both groups (range 0-100) with baseline scores of 65.2 (mean, SD=21.5; N=133; group A) and 64.7 (SD=23.2; N=131; group B) and with scores of 67.6 (SD=18.4; N=52) and 65.4 (SD=22.2; N=46), respectively, at 3 years. No statistically or clinically relevant differences were observed between groups in any QoL scale upon treatment completion or during follow-up. Both groups experienced declines in role functioning, body image, male impotence, and stool incontinence (Wexner), which did not fully recover over the follow-up period. Rectal blood/mucus discharge and anxiety improved during treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QoL did not differ between the two total neoadjuvant treatment sequences. QoL domains with long lasting deterioration may serve as endpoints in future studies focused on organ preservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.05.018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.05.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在一项多中心二期临床试验中,在全肠系膜切除术前进行放化疗(CRT)和巩固化疗(CT)的顺序显示出比CRT前的诱导CT更高的病理完全缓解率。在这里,我们提出了生活质量(QoL)的研究结果。材料与方法:将直肠癌患者(ct3 ~ 4、cn0 ~ 2)随机分为A组(CT+CRT;N=156)或B组(CRT+CT;N = 150)。这是治疗前和治疗期间以及随访期间无病患者的二级生活质量分析(EORTC QLQ-C30+CR29, Wexner)。Clinicaltrials: gov识别码:XXXX。结果:基线时,86%的人完成了问卷调查(N=134/156;A组),89% (N=133/150);B组),可获得性在1年降至73%对64%,2年降至61%对59%,3年降至51%对47%。两组的总体健康状况保持稳定(范围0-100),基线得分为65.2(平均,SD=21.5;N = 133;A组)和64.7 (SD=23.2;N = 131;B组),评分为67.6分(SD=18.4;N=52)和65.4 (SD=22.2;N=46),分别为3年。在治疗结束或随访期间,各组间的任何生活质量量表均无统计学或临床相关差异。两组都经历了角色功能、身体形象、男性阳痿和大便失禁的下降(Wexner),在随访期间没有完全恢复。治疗期间直肠血/粘液排出和焦虑有所改善。结论:两种新辅助治疗方案的生活质量无显著差异。长期恶化的生活质量域可以作为未来器官保存研究的终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of life after two sequences of total neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the randomized CAO/ARO/AIO-12 phase 2 trial.

Background and purpose: In a multicenter phase 2 trial the sequence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CT) prior to total mesorectal excision demonstrated higher pathological complete response rates than induction CT before CRT. Here, we present findings on quality of life (QoL).

Materials and methods: Patients with rectal carcinoma (cT3-4 cN0-2) were randomly assigned to group A (CT+CRT; N=156) or group B (CRT+CT; N=150). This is a secondary QoL analysis (EORTC QLQ-C30+CR29, Wexner) before and during treatment and of disease-free patients during follow-up.

Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: XXXX.

Results: At baseline, completed questionnaires were available for 86% (N=134/156; group A) and 89% (N=133/150; group B) of participants, with availability decreasing to 73% versus 64% at 1 year, 61% versus 59% at 2 years, and 51% versus 47% at 3 years. Global health status remained stable in both groups (range 0-100) with baseline scores of 65.2 (mean, SD=21.5; N=133; group A) and 64.7 (SD=23.2; N=131; group B) and with scores of 67.6 (SD=18.4; N=52) and 65.4 (SD=22.2; N=46), respectively, at 3 years. No statistically or clinically relevant differences were observed between groups in any QoL scale upon treatment completion or during follow-up. Both groups experienced declines in role functioning, body image, male impotence, and stool incontinence (Wexner), which did not fully recover over the follow-up period. Rectal blood/mucus discharge and anxiety improved during treatment.

Conclusions: QoL did not differ between the two total neoadjuvant treatment sequences. QoL domains with long lasting deterioration may serve as endpoints in future studies focused on organ preservation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信