Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Elisabeth Waldmann, Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer, Alexandra Demschik, Andreas Klinger, Daniela Penz, Michael Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch
{"title":"盲肠插管率对结肠镜术后结直肠癌死亡及结直肠癌前体检测的影响。","authors":"Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Elisabeth Waldmann, Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer, Alexandra Demschik, Andreas Klinger, Daniela Penz, Michael Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>The visualization of the whole colonic mucosa with complete colonoscopy including cecal intubation has been accepted as a quality parameter for screening colonoscopy. However, there is little evidence regarding the cecal intubation rate (CIR) and its association with long-term patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a linkage of individuals that participated in an Austrian Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Program to the Austrian death registry to obtain information on deaths of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). We performed logistic regression and time-to-event analyses to estimate the association the CIR with the probability to detect adenomas or proximal serrated polyps and the hazards for PCCRC death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 349,782 screening participants between January 2012 and December 2022 were included. With every 1 percentage point increase in the CIR, the probability to detect an adenoma increased by 1 percentage point (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.01; P < .001) and increased by 3 percentage points to detect a proximal serrated polyp (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < .001). There was a significantly lower risk for PCCRC death when endoscopists had a CIR of 95% to 100% (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.59; P < .001), compared with endoscopists with a CIR <90% or 90% to 95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The endoscopist's CIR is strongly associated with their ability to detect adenomas and proximal serrated polyps. A CIR of 95% to 100% was associated with the lowest hazards for PCCRC death. Based on this data, a CIR above 95% is the desirable target.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Cecal Intubation Rate on Post Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Deaths and Detection of Colorectal Cancer Precursors.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Elisabeth Waldmann, Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer, Alexandra Demschik, Andreas Klinger, Daniela Penz, Michael Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>The visualization of the whole colonic mucosa with complete colonoscopy including cecal intubation has been accepted as a quality parameter for screening colonoscopy. However, there is little evidence regarding the cecal intubation rate (CIR) and its association with long-term patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a linkage of individuals that participated in an Austrian Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Program to the Austrian death registry to obtain information on deaths of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). We performed logistic regression and time-to-event analyses to estimate the association the CIR with the probability to detect adenomas or proximal serrated polyps and the hazards for PCCRC death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 349,782 screening participants between January 2012 and December 2022 were included. With every 1 percentage point increase in the CIR, the probability to detect an adenoma increased by 1 percentage point (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.01; P < .001) and increased by 3 percentage points to detect a proximal serrated polyp (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < .001). There was a significantly lower risk for PCCRC death when endoscopists had a CIR of 95% to 100% (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.59; P < .001), compared with endoscopists with a CIR <90% or 90% to 95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The endoscopist's CIR is strongly associated with their ability to detect adenomas and proximal serrated polyps. A CIR of 95% to 100% was associated with the lowest hazards for PCCRC death. Based on this data, a CIR above 95% is the desirable target.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:包括盲肠插管在内的全结肠镜检查显示整个结肠粘膜已被公认为是筛查结肠镜检查的质量参数。然而,很少有证据表明盲肠插管率(CIR)及其与患者长期预后的关系。方法:我们将参加奥地利结肠镜检查质量保证计划的个体与奥地利死亡登记处联系起来,以获取结肠镜检查后结直肠癌(PCCRC)死亡的信息。我们进行了逻辑回归和事件时间分析,以估计CIR与发现腺瘤或近端锯齿状息肉的概率以及PCCRC死亡危险之间的关系。结果:2012年1月至2022年12月期间纳入349782名筛查参与者。CIR每增加1个百分点,发现腺瘤的概率就增加1个百分点(OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0 - 1.01, p)。结论:内镜医师的盲肠插管率与他们发现腺瘤和近端锯齿状息肉的能力密切相关。CIR为95-100%与PCCRC死亡风险最低相关。根据这些数据,CIR高于95%是理想的目标。
Effect of Cecal Intubation Rate on Post Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Deaths and Detection of Colorectal Cancer Precursors.
Background & aims: The visualization of the whole colonic mucosa with complete colonoscopy including cecal intubation has been accepted as a quality parameter for screening colonoscopy. However, there is little evidence regarding the cecal intubation rate (CIR) and its association with long-term patient outcome.
Methods: We did a linkage of individuals that participated in an Austrian Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Program to the Austrian death registry to obtain information on deaths of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). We performed logistic regression and time-to-event analyses to estimate the association the CIR with the probability to detect adenomas or proximal serrated polyps and the hazards for PCCRC death.
Results: A total of 349,782 screening participants between January 2012 and December 2022 were included. With every 1 percentage point increase in the CIR, the probability to detect an adenoma increased by 1 percentage point (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.01; P < .001) and increased by 3 percentage points to detect a proximal serrated polyp (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < .001). There was a significantly lower risk for PCCRC death when endoscopists had a CIR of 95% to 100% (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.59; P < .001), compared with endoscopists with a CIR <90% or 90% to 95%.
Conclusions: The endoscopist's CIR is strongly associated with their ability to detect adenomas and proximal serrated polyps. A CIR of 95% to 100% was associated with the lowest hazards for PCCRC death. Based on this data, a CIR above 95% is the desirable target.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion.
As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.