基于深度学习的急性闭角伴或不伴带状病变的超声生物显微镜自动鉴别:与眼科医生诊断表现的比较。

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Lu Cheng, Jiaming Hong, Hailiu Chen, Yunlan Ling, Shufen Lin, Jing Huang, Ethan Wu, Yangyunhui Li, Haotian Lin, Shaopeng Liu, Jingjing Huang
{"title":"基于深度学习的急性闭角伴或不伴带状病变的超声生物显微镜自动鉴别:与眼科医生诊断表现的比较。","authors":"Lu Cheng, Jiaming Hong, Hailiu Chen, Yunlan Ling, Shufen Lin, Jing Huang, Ethan Wu, Yangyunhui Li, Haotian Lin, Shaopeng Liu, Jingjing Huang","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM)-based artificial intelligence (AI) models for preoperative differentiation of acute angle closure (AAC) with or without zonulopathy and to compare their comprehensive diagnostic performance against ophthalmologists as a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Three AI models were developed to differentiate AAC with or without zonular laxity or lens subluxation using UBM images and ocular parameters. Their diagnostic performances were analysed, with the best-performing model then compared with two diagnostic methods used by ophthalmologists (logistic regression and UBM image analysis). Additionally, a robustness validation dataset, including images from UBM and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), was used to validate the robustness of the best-performing AI model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 537 eyes were included in this study. The best-performing AI model was image-based and achieved a macro-area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9046 with a diagnostic processing time of 0.03 s per image in differentiating AAC with or without zonulopathy. The manually calculated multinomial logistic regression model achieved a macro-AUC of 0.9373, requiring 1200.00 s per analysis. UBM image analysis achieved a mean accuracy and processing time of 64.17% and 20.13 s, respectively, per image. Robustness validation of the image-based AI model showed an accuracy of 66.67% and 61.11% for UBM and AS-OCT images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI models and ophthalmologists effectively differentiated AAC with or without zonulopathy. However, when evaluated in terms of both accuracy and efficiency, the AI model showed superior comprehensive diagnostic performance, demonstrating high clinical applicability for preoperative diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based automatic differentiation of acute angle closure with or without zonulopathy using ultrasound biomicroscopy: a comparison of diagnostic performance with ophthalmologists.\",\"authors\":\"Lu Cheng, Jiaming Hong, Hailiu Chen, Yunlan Ling, Shufen Lin, Jing Huang, Ethan Wu, Yangyunhui Li, Haotian Lin, Shaopeng Liu, Jingjing Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM)-based artificial intelligence (AI) models for preoperative differentiation of acute angle closure (AAC) with or without zonulopathy and to compare their comprehensive diagnostic performance against ophthalmologists as a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Three AI models were developed to differentiate AAC with or without zonular laxity or lens subluxation using UBM images and ocular parameters. Their diagnostic performances were analysed, with the best-performing model then compared with two diagnostic methods used by ophthalmologists (logistic regression and UBM image analysis). Additionally, a robustness validation dataset, including images from UBM and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), was used to validate the robustness of the best-performing AI model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 537 eyes were included in this study. The best-performing AI model was image-based and achieved a macro-area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9046 with a diagnostic processing time of 0.03 s per image in differentiating AAC with or without zonulopathy. The manually calculated multinomial logistic regression model achieved a macro-AUC of 0.9373, requiring 1200.00 s per analysis. UBM image analysis achieved a mean accuracy and processing time of 64.17% and 20.13 s, respectively, per image. Robustness validation of the image-based AI model showed an accuracy of 66.67% and 61.11% for UBM and AS-OCT images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI models and ophthalmologists effectively differentiated AAC with or without zonulopathy. However, when evaluated in terms of both accuracy and efficiency, the AI model showed superior comprehensive diagnostic performance, demonstrating high clinical applicability for preoperative diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在建立基于超声生物显微镜(UBM)的人工智能(AI)模型,用于急性闭角(AAC)伴或不伴带状病变的术前鉴别,并与眼科医生进行横断面研究,比较其综合诊断性能。方法和分析:建立了3种人工智能模型,利用UBM图像和眼部参数来区分AAC是否伴有带状松弛或晶状体半脱位。对其诊断性能进行分析,然后将表现最佳的模型与眼科医生使用的两种诊断方法(逻辑回归和UBM图像分析)进行比较。此外,鲁棒性验证数据集,包括来自UBM和前段光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)的图像,用于验证表现最佳的人工智能模型的鲁棒性。结果:本研究共纳入537只眼。表现最好的AI模型是基于图像的,在鉴别AAC是否伴有带状病变时,其宏观曲线下面积(AUC)为0.9046,每张图像的诊断处理时间为0.03 s。人工计算的多项逻辑回归模型的宏观auc为0.9373,每次分析需要1200.00 s。UBM图像分析的平均精度和处理时间分别为64.17%和20.13 s。基于图像的人工智能模型鲁棒性验证表明,UBM和AS-OCT图像的准确率分别为66.67%和61.11%。结论:人工智能模型和眼科医生可有效区分AAC伴或不伴带状病变。然而,从准确性和效率两方面进行评估时,人工智能模型显示出优越的综合诊断性能,对术前诊断具有较高的临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning-based automatic differentiation of acute angle closure with or without zonulopathy using ultrasound biomicroscopy: a comparison of diagnostic performance with ophthalmologists.

Objective: This study aims to develop ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM)-based artificial intelligence (AI) models for preoperative differentiation of acute angle closure (AAC) with or without zonulopathy and to compare their comprehensive diagnostic performance against ophthalmologists as a cross-sectional study.

Methods and analysis: Three AI models were developed to differentiate AAC with or without zonular laxity or lens subluxation using UBM images and ocular parameters. Their diagnostic performances were analysed, with the best-performing model then compared with two diagnostic methods used by ophthalmologists (logistic regression and UBM image analysis). Additionally, a robustness validation dataset, including images from UBM and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), was used to validate the robustness of the best-performing AI model.

Results: A total of 537 eyes were included in this study. The best-performing AI model was image-based and achieved a macro-area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9046 with a diagnostic processing time of 0.03 s per image in differentiating AAC with or without zonulopathy. The manually calculated multinomial logistic regression model achieved a macro-AUC of 0.9373, requiring 1200.00 s per analysis. UBM image analysis achieved a mean accuracy and processing time of 64.17% and 20.13 s, respectively, per image. Robustness validation of the image-based AI model showed an accuracy of 66.67% and 61.11% for UBM and AS-OCT images.

Conclusions: AI models and ophthalmologists effectively differentiated AAC with or without zonulopathy. However, when evaluated in terms of both accuracy and efficiency, the AI model showed superior comprehensive diagnostic performance, demonstrating high clinical applicability for preoperative diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信