低碳混凝土包括大量的火山灰和再生骨料:评估机械性能、微观结构、环境影响和成本效率

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Wisal Ahmed, Chengsen Ye, Guoyang Lu, S. Thomas Ng, Gang Liu, Yilin Wang
{"title":"低碳混凝土包括大量的火山灰和再生骨料:评估机械性能、微观结构、环境影响和成本效率","authors":"Wisal Ahmed, Chengsen Ye, Guoyang Lu, S. Thomas Ng, Gang Liu, Yilin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional concrete, the most extensively used construction material in the world today, heavily relies on natural resources and significantly contributes to environmental degradation due to its high carbon footprint. To address these issues, this study aims to design and evaluate the performance of low-carbon concrete mixes prepared through a collaborative effect of pozzolans (such as volcanic ash (VA), pulverized fuel ash (PFA), glass powder (GP), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)) and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). For this motive, various tests were performed to assess the mechanical properties, microstructural characteristics, environmental impact, and production cost of low-carbon concrete mixes with respect to OPC-based concrete. Test results revealed that the inclusion of 20% RCA reduced the compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strengths by 12%, 9%, and 16%, respectively. However, the inclusion of 30–45% pozzolanic materials significantly enhanced the mechanical properties of recycled concrete, with the 10GP-30GGBS combination demonstrating the highest enhancements. Ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) tests revealed about 5–11%, 9–11%, and 11–14% improvements for the samples comprising GP-VA, GP-PFA, and GP-GGBS, respectively. The water absorption progressively reduced from 4.9% to 3.6% for GP-VA combinations, from 4.6% to 3.3% for GP-PFA combinations, and from 4.0% to 2.9% for GP-GGBS combinations. From the microstructure observation and EDX analysis, notable improvements were found at the micro level together with the presence of higher silica content in pozzolan-based mixes, which contributed to the additional formation of CSH and CASH gels. Furthermore, environmental impact and cost analysis of modified mixes revealed significant reductions in carbon emissions (up to 39%) and overall cost (up to 16%) in comparison to the reference sample. Overall, it can be inferred that the combined use of GP-VA, GP-PFA, and GP-GGBS as replacements for OPC in low-carbon concrete mixes effectively enhances mechanical properties, reduces environmental impact, and lowers production costs, making it a viable approach for sustainable concrete production.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Carbon Concrete Comprising High-volume Pozzolan and Recycled Aggregate: Evaluating Mechanical Performance, Microstructure, Environmental Impact, and Cost Efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Wisal Ahmed, Chengsen Ye, Guoyang Lu, S. Thomas Ng, Gang Liu, Yilin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional concrete, the most extensively used construction material in the world today, heavily relies on natural resources and significantly contributes to environmental degradation due to its high carbon footprint. To address these issues, this study aims to design and evaluate the performance of low-carbon concrete mixes prepared through a collaborative effect of pozzolans (such as volcanic ash (VA), pulverized fuel ash (PFA), glass powder (GP), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)) and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). For this motive, various tests were performed to assess the mechanical properties, microstructural characteristics, environmental impact, and production cost of low-carbon concrete mixes with respect to OPC-based concrete. Test results revealed that the inclusion of 20% RCA reduced the compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strengths by 12%, 9%, and 16%, respectively. However, the inclusion of 30–45% pozzolanic materials significantly enhanced the mechanical properties of recycled concrete, with the 10GP-30GGBS combination demonstrating the highest enhancements. Ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) tests revealed about 5–11%, 9–11%, and 11–14% improvements for the samples comprising GP-VA, GP-PFA, and GP-GGBS, respectively. The water absorption progressively reduced from 4.9% to 3.6% for GP-VA combinations, from 4.6% to 3.3% for GP-PFA combinations, and from 4.0% to 2.9% for GP-GGBS combinations. From the microstructure observation and EDX analysis, notable improvements were found at the micro level together with the presence of higher silica content in pozzolan-based mixes, which contributed to the additional formation of CSH and CASH gels. Furthermore, environmental impact and cost analysis of modified mixes revealed significant reductions in carbon emissions (up to 39%) and overall cost (up to 16%) in comparison to the reference sample. Overall, it can be inferred that the combined use of GP-VA, GP-PFA, and GP-GGBS as replacements for OPC in low-carbon concrete mixes effectively enhances mechanical properties, reduces environmental impact, and lowers production costs, making it a viable approach for sustainable concrete production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145796\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统混凝土是当今世界上使用最广泛的建筑材料,它严重依赖自然资源,并且由于其高碳足迹而严重导致环境退化。为了解决这些问题,本研究旨在设计和评估通过火山灰(如火山灰(VA)、燃料粉状灰(PFA)、玻璃粉(GP)和磨碎的粒状高炉渣(GGBS))和再生混凝土骨料(RCA)协同效应制备的低碳混凝土混合料的性能。为此,进行了各种测试,以评估相对于opc基混凝土的低碳混凝土混合料的力学性能、微观结构特征、环境影响和生产成本。测试结果显示,20% RCA的掺入使材料的抗压、劈裂拉伸和抗弯强度分别降低了12%、9%和16%。然而,掺入30-45%的火山灰材料显著提高了再生混凝土的力学性能,其中10GP-30GGBS组合的增强效果最大。超声脉冲速度(UPV)测试结果显示,含有GP-VA、GP-PFA和GP-GGBS的样品分别提高了5-11%、9-11%和11-14%。GP-VA组合的吸水率从4.9%逐渐下降到3.6%,GP-PFA组合从4.6%下降到3.3%,GP-GGBS组合从4.0%下降到2.9%。从微观结构观察和EDX分析来看,在微观水平上发现了显著的改善,同时在火山灰基混合物中存在更高的二氧化硅含量,这有助于额外形成CSH和CASH凝胶。此外,环境影响和成本分析表明,与参考样品相比,改性混合物的碳排放(最多减少39%)和总成本(最多减少16%)显著减少。综上所示,在低碳混凝土配合料中,GP-VA、GP-PFA和GP-GGBS作为OPC的替代品,可以有效地提高混凝土的力学性能,减少对环境的影响,降低生产成本,是可持续混凝土生产的可行途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-Carbon Concrete Comprising High-volume Pozzolan and Recycled Aggregate: Evaluating Mechanical Performance, Microstructure, Environmental Impact, and Cost Efficiency
Conventional concrete, the most extensively used construction material in the world today, heavily relies on natural resources and significantly contributes to environmental degradation due to its high carbon footprint. To address these issues, this study aims to design and evaluate the performance of low-carbon concrete mixes prepared through a collaborative effect of pozzolans (such as volcanic ash (VA), pulverized fuel ash (PFA), glass powder (GP), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)) and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). For this motive, various tests were performed to assess the mechanical properties, microstructural characteristics, environmental impact, and production cost of low-carbon concrete mixes with respect to OPC-based concrete. Test results revealed that the inclusion of 20% RCA reduced the compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strengths by 12%, 9%, and 16%, respectively. However, the inclusion of 30–45% pozzolanic materials significantly enhanced the mechanical properties of recycled concrete, with the 10GP-30GGBS combination demonstrating the highest enhancements. Ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) tests revealed about 5–11%, 9–11%, and 11–14% improvements for the samples comprising GP-VA, GP-PFA, and GP-GGBS, respectively. The water absorption progressively reduced from 4.9% to 3.6% for GP-VA combinations, from 4.6% to 3.3% for GP-PFA combinations, and from 4.0% to 2.9% for GP-GGBS combinations. From the microstructure observation and EDX analysis, notable improvements were found at the micro level together with the presence of higher silica content in pozzolan-based mixes, which contributed to the additional formation of CSH and CASH gels. Furthermore, environmental impact and cost analysis of modified mixes revealed significant reductions in carbon emissions (up to 39%) and overall cost (up to 16%) in comparison to the reference sample. Overall, it can be inferred that the combined use of GP-VA, GP-PFA, and GP-GGBS as replacements for OPC in low-carbon concrete mixes effectively enhances mechanical properties, reduces environmental impact, and lowers production costs, making it a viable approach for sustainable concrete production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信