注意临床与社区之间的差距:我们应该如何关注大规模结核病筛查中的假阳性检测结果?

Lara D Veeken, Alvaro Schwalb, Katherine C Horton, Raspati C Koesoemadinata, Bachti Alisjahbana, Reinout van Crevel, Rein M G J Houben
{"title":"注意临床与社区之间的差距:我们应该如何关注大规模结核病筛查中的假阳性检测结果?","authors":"Lara D Veeken, Alvaro Schwalb, Katherine C Horton, Raspati C Koesoemadinata, Bachti Alisjahbana, Reinout van Crevel, Rein M G J Houben","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community-wide screening for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis may reduce tuberculosis burden, although concerns of overtreatment remain because of false positive diagnoses due to subpar specificity of current bacteriological tests for screening. Our review and data analysis shows that clinic-based test specificity estimates of Xpert against culture underestimate performance in communities, both for Xpert MTB/RIF (community=99.8% vs clinic=98.4%) and Xpert Ultra (community=99.4% vs clinic=95.6%), reducing the presumed false positivity of sputum Xpert using culture as reference by 86.8% and 85.4%, respectively, as compared to clinic-based specificity estimates. These findings support large-scale evaluation of community-wide screening for tuberculosis.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the clinic-community gap: how concerned should we be about false positive test results in mass tuberculosis screening?\",\"authors\":\"Lara D Veeken, Alvaro Schwalb, Katherine C Horton, Raspati C Koesoemadinata, Bachti Alisjahbana, Reinout van Crevel, Rein M G J Houben\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiaf268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Community-wide screening for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis may reduce tuberculosis burden, although concerns of overtreatment remain because of false positive diagnoses due to subpar specificity of current bacteriological tests for screening. Our review and data analysis shows that clinic-based test specificity estimates of Xpert against culture underestimate performance in communities, both for Xpert MTB/RIF (community=99.8% vs clinic=98.4%) and Xpert Ultra (community=99.4% vs clinic=95.6%), reducing the presumed false positivity of sputum Xpert using culture as reference by 86.8% and 85.4%, respectively, as compared to clinic-based specificity estimates. These findings support large-scale evaluation of community-wide screening for tuberculosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在社区范围内对细菌学确诊的肺结核进行筛查可以减轻结核病负担,尽管由于目前筛查细菌学检测的特异性低于标准,导致假阳性诊断,仍然存在过度治疗的担忧。我们的回顾和数据分析表明,基于临床的Xpert对培养的检测特异性估计低估了社区的表现,无论是Xpert MTB/RIF(社区=99.8% vs诊所=98.4%)还是Xpert Ultra(社区=99.4% vs诊所=95.6%),与基于临床的特异性估计相比,以培养为参考的痰Xpert的假定假阳性分别降低了86.8%和85.4%。这些发现支持对社区结核病筛查进行大规模评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mind the clinic-community gap: how concerned should we be about false positive test results in mass tuberculosis screening?
Community-wide screening for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis may reduce tuberculosis burden, although concerns of overtreatment remain because of false positive diagnoses due to subpar specificity of current bacteriological tests for screening. Our review and data analysis shows that clinic-based test specificity estimates of Xpert against culture underestimate performance in communities, both for Xpert MTB/RIF (community=99.8% vs clinic=98.4%) and Xpert Ultra (community=99.4% vs clinic=95.6%), reducing the presumed false positivity of sputum Xpert using culture as reference by 86.8% and 85.4%, respectively, as compared to clinic-based specificity estimates. These findings support large-scale evaluation of community-wide screening for tuberculosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信