Lara D Veeken, Alvaro Schwalb, Katherine C Horton, Raspati C Koesoemadinata, Bachti Alisjahbana, Reinout van Crevel, Rein M G J Houben
{"title":"注意临床与社区之间的差距:我们应该如何关注大规模结核病筛查中的假阳性检测结果?","authors":"Lara D Veeken, Alvaro Schwalb, Katherine C Horton, Raspati C Koesoemadinata, Bachti Alisjahbana, Reinout van Crevel, Rein M G J Houben","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community-wide screening for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis may reduce tuberculosis burden, although concerns of overtreatment remain because of false positive diagnoses due to subpar specificity of current bacteriological tests for screening. Our review and data analysis shows that clinic-based test specificity estimates of Xpert against culture underestimate performance in communities, both for Xpert MTB/RIF (community=99.8% vs clinic=98.4%) and Xpert Ultra (community=99.4% vs clinic=95.6%), reducing the presumed false positivity of sputum Xpert using culture as reference by 86.8% and 85.4%, respectively, as compared to clinic-based specificity estimates. These findings support large-scale evaluation of community-wide screening for tuberculosis.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the clinic-community gap: how concerned should we be about false positive test results in mass tuberculosis screening?\",\"authors\":\"Lara D Veeken, Alvaro Schwalb, Katherine C Horton, Raspati C Koesoemadinata, Bachti Alisjahbana, Reinout van Crevel, Rein M G J Houben\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiaf268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Community-wide screening for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis may reduce tuberculosis burden, although concerns of overtreatment remain because of false positive diagnoses due to subpar specificity of current bacteriological tests for screening. Our review and data analysis shows that clinic-based test specificity estimates of Xpert against culture underestimate performance in communities, both for Xpert MTB/RIF (community=99.8% vs clinic=98.4%) and Xpert Ultra (community=99.4% vs clinic=95.6%), reducing the presumed false positivity of sputum Xpert using culture as reference by 86.8% and 85.4%, respectively, as compared to clinic-based specificity estimates. These findings support large-scale evaluation of community-wide screening for tuberculosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mind the clinic-community gap: how concerned should we be about false positive test results in mass tuberculosis screening?
Community-wide screening for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis may reduce tuberculosis burden, although concerns of overtreatment remain because of false positive diagnoses due to subpar specificity of current bacteriological tests for screening. Our review and data analysis shows that clinic-based test specificity estimates of Xpert against culture underestimate performance in communities, both for Xpert MTB/RIF (community=99.8% vs clinic=98.4%) and Xpert Ultra (community=99.4% vs clinic=95.6%), reducing the presumed false positivity of sputum Xpert using culture as reference by 86.8% and 85.4%, respectively, as compared to clinic-based specificity estimates. These findings support large-scale evaluation of community-wide screening for tuberculosis.