Muhammad M Elsharkawy, Eslam Mohammed Rabea, Anas Ashraf Elassal, Anan Maher Salaimeh, Adam Naji Zaro, Saad Mohamed Saad, Mohamed Eldesouki
{"title":"局部替莫洛尔治疗慢性未愈合溃疡的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Muhammad M Elsharkawy, Eslam Mohammed Rabea, Anas Ashraf Elassal, Anan Maher Salaimeh, Adam Naji Zaro, Saad Mohamed Saad, Mohamed Eldesouki","doi":"10.1177/15347346251345249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTopical timolol appears to provide a curative effect in managing chronic ulcers. However, the pooled evidence of its effect hasn't been established yet. This is the first Meta-analysis to evaluate and assess the efficacy of topical timolol in accelerating wound healing in patients with chronic refractory ulcers.MethodsWe comprehensively searched different electronic databases; PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to November 2024. The search was conducted without imposing any restrictions on publication date or study design. The ROB-II tool was used to assess the quality of included RCTs. NIH tools were used to evaluate the quality of included cohort and single arm studies. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were used as effect estimates.ResultsSix studies were included in this systematic review, comprising two single-arm studies and four double-arm studies (3 RCTs and 1 cohort study). Data from the four double-arm studies on venous ulcers were pooled for meta-analysis. The results showed that topical timolol significantly reduced ulcer area compared to control at 2 weeks (-23.63%; 95% CI: -29.26 to -18.00; p < 0.00001), 4 weeks (-41.40%; 95% CI: -49.57 to -33.23; p < 0.00001), and 12 weeks (-23.38%; 95% CI: -39.43 to -7.33; p = 0.004). Complete ulcer healing was observed at 4 weeks (RR: 12.00; 95% CI: 1.68 to 85.84; p = 0.01) and 12 weeks (RR: 3.79; 95% CI: 0.44 to 32.54; p = 0.22).ConclusionTopical timolol has the potential to promote healing in chronic unhealed ulcers. This meta-analysis, focusing on chronic venous ulcers, consistently showed favorable results across different time points. However, the small sample sizes, lack of blinding, and inclusion of only four studies limit the generalizability of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251345249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Topical Timolol in Chronic Unhealed Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad M Elsharkawy, Eslam Mohammed Rabea, Anas Ashraf Elassal, Anan Maher Salaimeh, Adam Naji Zaro, Saad Mohamed Saad, Mohamed Eldesouki\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347346251345249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundTopical timolol appears to provide a curative effect in managing chronic ulcers. However, the pooled evidence of its effect hasn't been established yet. This is the first Meta-analysis to evaluate and assess the efficacy of topical timolol in accelerating wound healing in patients with chronic refractory ulcers.MethodsWe comprehensively searched different electronic databases; PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to November 2024. The search was conducted without imposing any restrictions on publication date or study design. The ROB-II tool was used to assess the quality of included RCTs. NIH tools were used to evaluate the quality of included cohort and single arm studies. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were used as effect estimates.ResultsSix studies were included in this systematic review, comprising two single-arm studies and four double-arm studies (3 RCTs and 1 cohort study). Data from the four double-arm studies on venous ulcers were pooled for meta-analysis. The results showed that topical timolol significantly reduced ulcer area compared to control at 2 weeks (-23.63%; 95% CI: -29.26 to -18.00; p < 0.00001), 4 weeks (-41.40%; 95% CI: -49.57 to -33.23; p < 0.00001), and 12 weeks (-23.38%; 95% CI: -39.43 to -7.33; p = 0.004). Complete ulcer healing was observed at 4 weeks (RR: 12.00; 95% CI: 1.68 to 85.84; p = 0.01) and 12 weeks (RR: 3.79; 95% CI: 0.44 to 32.54; p = 0.22).ConclusionTopical timolol has the potential to promote healing in chronic unhealed ulcers. This meta-analysis, focusing on chronic venous ulcers, consistently showed favorable results across different time points. However, the small sample sizes, lack of blinding, and inclusion of only four studies limit the generalizability of the findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15347346251345249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251345249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251345249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:局部噻莫洛尔似乎对治疗慢性溃疡有疗效。然而,其效果的综合证据尚未建立。这是第一个评估局部噻莫洛尔加速慢性难治性溃疡患者伤口愈合效果的meta分析。方法综合检索不同的电子数据库;PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library和ClinicalTrials.gov从成立到2024年11月。在进行检索时,没有对发表日期或研究设计施加任何限制。采用robb - ii工具评估纳入的随机对照试验的质量。使用NIH工具评估纳入的队列和单组研究的质量。风险比(RR)和平均差异(MD)采用95%置信区间(ci)作为效果估计。结果本系统综述纳入6项研究,包括2项单组研究和4项双组研究(3项随机对照试验和1项队列研究)。四项关于静脉溃疡的双臂研究的数据被汇总进行荟萃分析。结果显示,与对照组相比,局部噻洛尔在2周时显著减少溃疡面积(-23.63%;95% CI: -29.26 ~ -18.00;p
Efficacy of Topical Timolol in Chronic Unhealed Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BackgroundTopical timolol appears to provide a curative effect in managing chronic ulcers. However, the pooled evidence of its effect hasn't been established yet. This is the first Meta-analysis to evaluate and assess the efficacy of topical timolol in accelerating wound healing in patients with chronic refractory ulcers.MethodsWe comprehensively searched different electronic databases; PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to November 2024. The search was conducted without imposing any restrictions on publication date or study design. The ROB-II tool was used to assess the quality of included RCTs. NIH tools were used to evaluate the quality of included cohort and single arm studies. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were used as effect estimates.ResultsSix studies were included in this systematic review, comprising two single-arm studies and four double-arm studies (3 RCTs and 1 cohort study). Data from the four double-arm studies on venous ulcers were pooled for meta-analysis. The results showed that topical timolol significantly reduced ulcer area compared to control at 2 weeks (-23.63%; 95% CI: -29.26 to -18.00; p < 0.00001), 4 weeks (-41.40%; 95% CI: -49.57 to -33.23; p < 0.00001), and 12 weeks (-23.38%; 95% CI: -39.43 to -7.33; p = 0.004). Complete ulcer healing was observed at 4 weeks (RR: 12.00; 95% CI: 1.68 to 85.84; p = 0.01) and 12 weeks (RR: 3.79; 95% CI: 0.44 to 32.54; p = 0.22).ConclusionTopical timolol has the potential to promote healing in chronic unhealed ulcers. This meta-analysis, focusing on chronic venous ulcers, consistently showed favorable results across different time points. However, the small sample sizes, lack of blinding, and inclusion of only four studies limit the generalizability of the findings.