Chloé Algoet, Sofie Carrette, Alfred Meurs, Ann Mertens, Dimitri Hemelsoet, Paul Boon, Kristl Vonck
{"title":"连续θ波爆发刺激治疗局部连续性癫痫:一个病例系列。","authors":"Chloé Algoet, Sofie Carrette, Alfred Meurs, Ann Mertens, Dimitri Hemelsoet, Paul Boon, Kristl Vonck","doi":"10.1186/s42234-025-00175-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is a medication-resistant form of focal status epilepticus (SE), causing significant morbidity. This case series explored whether continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) could reduce seizure activity in patients with EPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three patients with motor EPC (2M/1F) underwent an accelerated cTBS protocol over four consecutive days (five 40-s trains/day, 5Hz bursts, 3 pulses at 50Hz/burst). Stimulation targeted the epileptogenic zone using a figure-of-eight coil at 80% of the resting motor threshold. Electroencephalography (EEG) was conducted before and after each session. Seizure frequency, intensity, adverse events (AEs), seizure diaries, and follow-up data were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>cTBS did not interrupt EPC in any patient. One patient reported a 17% reduction in seizure frequency. Another noted mild improvement in shoulder jerks, and a third reported reduced arm tension, though without clinical confirmation. EEG showed no significant changes. One patient experienced seizures during stimulation, and another reported worsening of pre-existing headaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this small case series, a four-day accelerated cTBS protocol did not yield clinically meaningful seizure control in EPC. Further research is needed to evaluate TMS and TBS in SE and EPC, where a significant treatment gap remains.</p>","PeriodicalId":72363,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectronic medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous theta burst stimulation in the treatment of epilepsia partialis continua: a case series.\",\"authors\":\"Chloé Algoet, Sofie Carrette, Alfred Meurs, Ann Mertens, Dimitri Hemelsoet, Paul Boon, Kristl Vonck\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42234-025-00175-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is a medication-resistant form of focal status epilepticus (SE), causing significant morbidity. This case series explored whether continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) could reduce seizure activity in patients with EPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three patients with motor EPC (2M/1F) underwent an accelerated cTBS protocol over four consecutive days (five 40-s trains/day, 5Hz bursts, 3 pulses at 50Hz/burst). Stimulation targeted the epileptogenic zone using a figure-of-eight coil at 80% of the resting motor threshold. Electroencephalography (EEG) was conducted before and after each session. Seizure frequency, intensity, adverse events (AEs), seizure diaries, and follow-up data were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>cTBS did not interrupt EPC in any patient. One patient reported a 17% reduction in seizure frequency. Another noted mild improvement in shoulder jerks, and a third reported reduced arm tension, though without clinical confirmation. EEG showed no significant changes. One patient experienced seizures during stimulation, and another reported worsening of pre-existing headaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this small case series, a four-day accelerated cTBS protocol did not yield clinically meaningful seizure control in EPC. Further research is needed to evaluate TMS and TBS in SE and EPC, where a significant treatment gap remains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioelectronic medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100802/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioelectronic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-025-00175-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectronic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-025-00175-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuous theta burst stimulation in the treatment of epilepsia partialis continua: a case series.
Background: Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is a medication-resistant form of focal status epilepticus (SE), causing significant morbidity. This case series explored whether continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) could reduce seizure activity in patients with EPC.
Methods: Three patients with motor EPC (2M/1F) underwent an accelerated cTBS protocol over four consecutive days (five 40-s trains/day, 5Hz bursts, 3 pulses at 50Hz/burst). Stimulation targeted the epileptogenic zone using a figure-of-eight coil at 80% of the resting motor threshold. Electroencephalography (EEG) was conducted before and after each session. Seizure frequency, intensity, adverse events (AEs), seizure diaries, and follow-up data were assessed.
Results: cTBS did not interrupt EPC in any patient. One patient reported a 17% reduction in seizure frequency. Another noted mild improvement in shoulder jerks, and a third reported reduced arm tension, though without clinical confirmation. EEG showed no significant changes. One patient experienced seizures during stimulation, and another reported worsening of pre-existing headaches.
Conclusion: In this small case series, a four-day accelerated cTBS protocol did not yield clinically meaningful seizure control in EPC. Further research is needed to evaluate TMS and TBS in SE and EPC, where a significant treatment gap remains.