利用深度学习模型从CT数据中检测、分类和分割肋骨骨折:文献综述和汇总分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Stella Den Hengst, Noor Borren, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Job N Doornberg, Theo Van Walsum, Mathieu M E Wijffels, Michael H J Verhofstad
{"title":"利用深度学习模型从CT数据中检测、分类和分割肋骨骨折:文献综述和汇总分析。","authors":"Stella Den Hengst, Noor Borren, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Job N Doornberg, Theo Van Walsum, Mathieu M E Wijffels, Michael H J Verhofstad","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trauma-induced rib fractures are common injuries. The gold standard for diagnosing rib fractures is computed tomography (CT), but the sensitivity in the acute setting is low, and interpreting CT slices is labor-intensive. This has led to the development of new diagnostic approaches leveraging deep learning (DL) models. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed to compare the performance of DL models in the detection, segmentation, and classification of rib fractures based on CT scans.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was performed using various databases for studies describing DL models detecting, segmenting, or classifying rib fractures from CT data. Reported performance metrics included sensitivity, false-positive rate, F1-score, precision, accuracy, and mean average precision. A meta-analysis was performed on the sensitivity scores to compare the DL models with clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 323 identified records, 25 were included. Twenty-one studies reported on detection, four on segmentation, and 10 on classification. Twenty studies had adequate data for meta-analysis. The gold standard labels were provided by clinicians who were radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. For detecting rib fractures, DL models had a higher sensitivity (86.7%; 95% CI: 82.6%-90.2%) than clinicians (75.4%; 95% CI: 68.1%-82.1%). In classification, the sensitivity of DL models for displaced rib fractures (97.3%; 95% CI: 95.6%-98.5%) was significantly better than that of clinicians (88.2%; 95% CI: 84.8%-91.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DL models for rib fracture detection and classification achieved promising results. With better sensitivities than clinicians for detecting and classifying displaced rib fractures, the future should focus on implementing DL models in daily clinics.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-systematic review and pooled analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection, Classification, and Segmentation of Rib Fractures From CT Data Using Deep Learning Models: A Review of Literature and Pooled Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Stella Den Hengst, Noor Borren, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Job N Doornberg, Theo Van Walsum, Mathieu M E Wijffels, Michael H J Verhofstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trauma-induced rib fractures are common injuries. The gold standard for diagnosing rib fractures is computed tomography (CT), but the sensitivity in the acute setting is low, and interpreting CT slices is labor-intensive. This has led to the development of new diagnostic approaches leveraging deep learning (DL) models. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed to compare the performance of DL models in the detection, segmentation, and classification of rib fractures based on CT scans.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was performed using various databases for studies describing DL models detecting, segmenting, or classifying rib fractures from CT data. Reported performance metrics included sensitivity, false-positive rate, F1-score, precision, accuracy, and mean average precision. A meta-analysis was performed on the sensitivity scores to compare the DL models with clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 323 identified records, 25 were included. Twenty-one studies reported on detection, four on segmentation, and 10 on classification. Twenty studies had adequate data for meta-analysis. The gold standard labels were provided by clinicians who were radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. For detecting rib fractures, DL models had a higher sensitivity (86.7%; 95% CI: 82.6%-90.2%) than clinicians (75.4%; 95% CI: 68.1%-82.1%). In classification, the sensitivity of DL models for displaced rib fractures (97.3%; 95% CI: 95.6%-98.5%) was significantly better than that of clinicians (88.2%; 95% CI: 84.8%-91.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DL models for rib fracture detection and classification achieved promising results. With better sensitivities than clinicians for detecting and classifying displaced rib fractures, the future should focus on implementing DL models in daily clinics.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-systematic review and pooled analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000833\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000833","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:外伤性肋骨骨折是一种常见的损伤。诊断肋骨骨折的金标准是计算机断层扫描(CT),但在急性情况下灵敏度很低,而且解读CT切片是一项劳动密集型工作。这导致了利用深度学习(DL)模型的新诊断方法的发展。本系统综述和汇总分析旨在比较基于CT扫描的DL模型在肋骨骨折的检测、分割和分类方面的性能。材料和方法:使用各种数据库进行文献检索,研究描述DL模型从CT数据中检测、分割或分类肋骨骨折。报告的性能指标包括灵敏度、假阳性率、f1评分、精密度、准确度和平均精密度。对敏感性评分进行荟萃分析,以比较DL模型与临床医生。结果:在323份被识别的记录中,有25份被纳入。21篇关于检测的研究,4篇关于分割的研究,10篇关于分类的研究。20项研究有足够的数据进行荟萃分析。金标准标签是由临床医生提供的,他们是放射科医生和骨科医生。对于肋骨骨折的检测,DL模型具有更高的灵敏度(86.7%;95% CI: 82.6%-90.2%)高于临床医生(75.4%;95% ci: 68.1%-82.1%)。在分类上,DL模型对移位性肋骨骨折的敏感性为97.3%;95% CI: 95.6%-98.5%)明显优于临床医生(88.2%;95% ci: 84.8%-91.3%)。结论:DL模型用于肋骨骨折检测和分类取得了良好的效果。与临床医生相比,DL模型在检测和分类移位性肋骨骨折方面具有更好的敏感性,未来应侧重于在日常临床中实施DL模型。证据等级:iii级——系统评价和汇总分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection, Classification, and Segmentation of Rib Fractures From CT Data Using Deep Learning Models: A Review of Literature and Pooled Analysis.

Purpose: Trauma-induced rib fractures are common injuries. The gold standard for diagnosing rib fractures is computed tomography (CT), but the sensitivity in the acute setting is low, and interpreting CT slices is labor-intensive. This has led to the development of new diagnostic approaches leveraging deep learning (DL) models. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed to compare the performance of DL models in the detection, segmentation, and classification of rib fractures based on CT scans.

Materials and methods: A literature search was performed using various databases for studies describing DL models detecting, segmenting, or classifying rib fractures from CT data. Reported performance metrics included sensitivity, false-positive rate, F1-score, precision, accuracy, and mean average precision. A meta-analysis was performed on the sensitivity scores to compare the DL models with clinicians.

Results: Of the 323 identified records, 25 were included. Twenty-one studies reported on detection, four on segmentation, and 10 on classification. Twenty studies had adequate data for meta-analysis. The gold standard labels were provided by clinicians who were radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. For detecting rib fractures, DL models had a higher sensitivity (86.7%; 95% CI: 82.6%-90.2%) than clinicians (75.4%; 95% CI: 68.1%-82.1%). In classification, the sensitivity of DL models for displaced rib fractures (97.3%; 95% CI: 95.6%-98.5%) was significantly better than that of clinicians (88.2%; 95% CI: 84.8%-91.3%).

Conclusions: DL models for rib fracture detection and classification achieved promising results. With better sensitivities than clinicians for detecting and classifying displaced rib fractures, the future should focus on implementing DL models in daily clinics.

Level of evidence: Level III-systematic review and pooled analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信