【数字化时代的培训——数字化 nster皮肤病理学课程评价】。

IF 0.7
Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-23 DOI:10.1007/s00105-025-05516-x
Paul Schmidle, Dieter Metze, Ole Hätscher, Stephan Alexander Braun
{"title":"【数字化时代的培训——数字化<s:1> nster皮肤病理学课程评价】。","authors":"Paul Schmidle, Dieter Metze, Ole Hätscher, Stephan Alexander Braun","doi":"10.1007/s00105-025-05516-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dermatopathology is an important component in diagnosing dermatological diseases. For more than 20 years, training courses have been offered in Münster to provide structured insight into dermatopathology. Since 2021 these courses have been offered in a digital format.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Goals were (i) to present the new digital course format, (ii) to systematically analyze the evaluation of the online courses by the participants and (iii) to discuss the general advantages and disadvantages of an increasingly digital training in dermatopathology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2021-2024, annual online courses were evaluated by participants using a standardized questionnaire. Questions were asked about specialist title, level of training, country of origin, technical implementation of the digital format, and course content. Responses were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conversion of the courses to a digital format was rated very positively overall. Participants had no problems with the technical implementation. The participants would like to see more digital courses in dermatopathology in the future and even prefer digital courses to analogue ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The future also belongs to complementary digital teaching formats in dermatopathology. Our example shows that these are already technically feasible and have been consistently positively evaluated by participants. However, purely online events also have disadvantages, particularly due to the lack of personal interaction. A combination of various face-to-face and digital formats seems to be the best way forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":72786,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"434-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Training in the age of digitalization- evaluation of the digital Münster dermatopathology course].\",\"authors\":\"Paul Schmidle, Dieter Metze, Ole Hätscher, Stephan Alexander Braun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00105-025-05516-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dermatopathology is an important component in diagnosing dermatological diseases. For more than 20 years, training courses have been offered in Münster to provide structured insight into dermatopathology. Since 2021 these courses have been offered in a digital format.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Goals were (i) to present the new digital course format, (ii) to systematically analyze the evaluation of the online courses by the participants and (iii) to discuss the general advantages and disadvantages of an increasingly digital training in dermatopathology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2021-2024, annual online courses were evaluated by participants using a standardized questionnaire. Questions were asked about specialist title, level of training, country of origin, technical implementation of the digital format, and course content. Responses were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conversion of the courses to a digital format was rated very positively overall. Participants had no problems with the technical implementation. The participants would like to see more digital courses in dermatopathology in the future and even prefer digital courses to analogue ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The future also belongs to complementary digital teaching formats in dermatopathology. Our example shows that these are already technically feasible and have been consistently positively evaluated by participants. However, purely online events also have disadvantages, particularly due to the lack of personal interaction. A combination of various face-to-face and digital formats seems to be the best way forward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"434-440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-025-05516-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-025-05516-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:皮肤病理学是皮肤病诊断的重要组成部分。20多年来,在m nster提供培训课程,以提供对皮肤病理学的结构化见解。自2021年起,这些课程以数字格式提供。目的:目标是(i)呈现新的数字课程格式,(ii)系统地分析参与者对在线课程的评价,(iii)讨论日益数字化的皮肤病理学培训的总体优势和劣势。材料和方法:从2021年到2024年,参与者使用标准化问卷对年度在线课程进行评估。问题涉及专家头衔、培训水平、原籍国、数字格式的技术实施和课程内容。对反应进行统计学分析。结果:课程转换为数字格式的总体评价非常积极。参与者对技术实施没有任何问题。参与者希望在未来看到更多的皮肤病理学数字课程,甚至更喜欢数字课程而不是模拟课程。结论:皮肤病理学的数字化互补教学模式是未来的发展方向。我们的例子表明,这些方法在技术上已经是可行的,并且得到了参与者一致的积极评价。然而,纯粹的在线活动也有缺点,特别是由于缺乏个人互动。各种面对面和数字形式的结合似乎是最好的发展方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

[Training in the age of digitalization- evaluation of the digital Münster dermatopathology course].

[Training in the age of digitalization- evaluation of the digital Münster dermatopathology course].

[Training in the age of digitalization- evaluation of the digital Münster dermatopathology course].

[Training in the age of digitalization- evaluation of the digital Münster dermatopathology course].

Background: Dermatopathology is an important component in diagnosing dermatological diseases. For more than 20 years, training courses have been offered in Münster to provide structured insight into dermatopathology. Since 2021 these courses have been offered in a digital format.

Objectives: Goals were (i) to present the new digital course format, (ii) to systematically analyze the evaluation of the online courses by the participants and (iii) to discuss the general advantages and disadvantages of an increasingly digital training in dermatopathology.

Materials and methods: From 2021-2024, annual online courses were evaluated by participants using a standardized questionnaire. Questions were asked about specialist title, level of training, country of origin, technical implementation of the digital format, and course content. Responses were statistically analyzed.

Results: The conversion of the courses to a digital format was rated very positively overall. Participants had no problems with the technical implementation. The participants would like to see more digital courses in dermatopathology in the future and even prefer digital courses to analogue ones.

Conclusion: The future also belongs to complementary digital teaching formats in dermatopathology. Our example shows that these are already technically feasible and have been consistently positively evaluated by participants. However, purely online events also have disadvantages, particularly due to the lack of personal interaction. A combination of various face-to-face and digital formats seems to be the best way forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信