35例欧洲Usher综合征患者前庭表型-基因型相关性分析

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ana Margarida Amorim, Ana Beatriz Ramada, Ana Cristina Lopes, Hugo Barcelos Figueiredo, João Lemos, João Carlos Ribeiro
{"title":"35例欧洲Usher综合征患者前庭表型-基因型相关性分析","authors":"Ana Margarida Amorim, Ana Beatriz Ramada, Ana Cristina Lopes, Hugo Barcelos Figueiredo, João Lemos, João Carlos Ribeiro","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate genotype-phenotype correlations in Usher syndrome (USH).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-five USH patients were included, categorized into three genetic-based groups: USH1 (<i>n</i> = 11), USH2 (<i>n</i> = 22), and USH4 (<i>n</i> = 2). The functional and emotional impact of dizziness and equilibrium was assessed using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Participants underwent pure-tone threshold testing, bithermal caloric testing, rotary chair testing (RCT), video head impulse test (vHIT), ocular (oVEMP) and cervical (cVEMP) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and posturography. Genotype-phenotype associations were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total DHI could only distinguish USH1 (25.71 ± 21.04) from USH2 (50.13 ± 22.54, <i>p</i> = .024) but not between the three groups (<i>p</i> = .084). ABC and HADS could not also distinguish between the three USH subgroups (<i>p</i> = .286 and .180). Hearing loss in USH1 was significantly greater than in USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed greater caloric weakness than USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .004). RCT was not completed in USH4 but could distinguish between USH1 and USH2 (sinus 0.16 Hz, <i>p</i> = .033; sinus 0.32 Hz, <i>p</i> = .011; and sinus 0.64 Hz, <i>p</i> = .003). vHIT in USH1 demonstrated lower overall gain than in USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed higher number of absent cVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2/USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed a higher number of absent oVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2 and USH4 (right ear, <i>p</i> < .007; left ear, <i>p</i> < .023). In posturography, no relevant differences were found between the three USH groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contemporary hearing and vestibular assessment successfully differentiated between distinct USH groups. However, varying degrees of vestibular dysfunction were observed across all groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vestibular Phenotype-Genotype Correlation in a Cohort of 35 European Usher Syndrome Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Margarida Amorim, Ana Beatriz Ramada, Ana Cristina Lopes, Hugo Barcelos Figueiredo, João Lemos, João Carlos Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate genotype-phenotype correlations in Usher syndrome (USH).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-five USH patients were included, categorized into three genetic-based groups: USH1 (<i>n</i> = 11), USH2 (<i>n</i> = 22), and USH4 (<i>n</i> = 2). The functional and emotional impact of dizziness and equilibrium was assessed using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Participants underwent pure-tone threshold testing, bithermal caloric testing, rotary chair testing (RCT), video head impulse test (vHIT), ocular (oVEMP) and cervical (cVEMP) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and posturography. Genotype-phenotype associations were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total DHI could only distinguish USH1 (25.71 ± 21.04) from USH2 (50.13 ± 22.54, <i>p</i> = .024) but not between the three groups (<i>p</i> = .084). ABC and HADS could not also distinguish between the three USH subgroups (<i>p</i> = .286 and .180). Hearing loss in USH1 was significantly greater than in USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed greater caloric weakness than USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .004). RCT was not completed in USH4 but could distinguish between USH1 and USH2 (sinus 0.16 Hz, <i>p</i> = .033; sinus 0.32 Hz, <i>p</i> = .011; and sinus 0.64 Hz, <i>p</i> = .003). vHIT in USH1 demonstrated lower overall gain than in USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed higher number of absent cVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2/USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed a higher number of absent oVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2 and USH4 (right ear, <i>p</i> < .007; left ear, <i>p</i> < .023). In posturography, no relevant differences were found between the three USH groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contemporary hearing and vestibular assessment successfully differentiated between distinct USH groups. However, varying degrees of vestibular dysfunction were observed across all groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00194\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究Usher综合征(USH)基因型与表型的相关性。方法:将35例USH患者分为3组:USH1组(n = 11)、USH2组(n = 22)和USH4组(n = 2)。使用头晕障碍量表(DHI)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)和特定活动平衡信心量表(ABC)评估头晕和平衡的功能和情绪影响。参与者进行了纯音阈值测试、热测试、旋转椅测试(RCT)、视频头部脉冲测试(vHIT)、眼(oVEMP)和颈(cemp)前庭诱发肌源性电位和体位照相。分析基因型与表型的相关性。结果:总DHI仅能区分USH1(25.71±21.04)和USH2(50.13±22.54,p = 0.024),三组间无差异(p = 0.084)。ABC和HADS也不能区分三个USH亚组(p = 0.286和0.180)。USH1组听力损失明显大于USH2和USH4组(p < 0.001)。USH1比USH2和USH4表现出更大的热量无力(p < 0.004)。USH4未完成RCT,但可以区分USH1和USH2(窦区0.16 Hz, p = 0.033;鼻窦0.32 Hz, p = 0.011;鼻窦0.64 Hz, p = 0.003)。与USH2和USH4相比,USH1的vHIT表现出较低的总体增益(p < 0.001)。与USH2/USH4相比,USH1右耳和/或左耳cemp反应缺失的数量更多(p < 0.001)。与USH2和USH4相比,USH1在右耳和/或左耳表现出更多的oVEMP缺失反应(右耳,p < .007;左耳,p < 0.023)。在体位学方面,三组间未发现相关差异。结论:当代听力和前庭功能评估可成功区分不同的USH组。然而,在所有组中都观察到不同程度的前庭功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vestibular Phenotype-Genotype Correlation in a Cohort of 35 European Usher Syndrome Patients.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate genotype-phenotype correlations in Usher syndrome (USH).

Method: Thirty-five USH patients were included, categorized into three genetic-based groups: USH1 (n = 11), USH2 (n = 22), and USH4 (n = 2). The functional and emotional impact of dizziness and equilibrium was assessed using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Participants underwent pure-tone threshold testing, bithermal caloric testing, rotary chair testing (RCT), video head impulse test (vHIT), ocular (oVEMP) and cervical (cVEMP) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and posturography. Genotype-phenotype associations were analyzed.

Results: Total DHI could only distinguish USH1 (25.71 ± 21.04) from USH2 (50.13 ± 22.54, p = .024) but not between the three groups (p = .084). ABC and HADS could not also distinguish between the three USH subgroups (p = .286 and .180). Hearing loss in USH1 was significantly greater than in USH2 and USH4 (p < .001). USH1 showed greater caloric weakness than USH2 and USH4 (p < .004). RCT was not completed in USH4 but could distinguish between USH1 and USH2 (sinus 0.16 Hz, p = .033; sinus 0.32 Hz, p = .011; and sinus 0.64 Hz, p = .003). vHIT in USH1 demonstrated lower overall gain than in USH2 and USH4 (p < .001). USH1 showed higher number of absent cVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2/USH4 (p < .001). USH1 showed a higher number of absent oVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2 and USH4 (right ear, p < .007; left ear, p < .023). In posturography, no relevant differences were found between the three USH groups.

Conclusions: Contemporary hearing and vestibular assessment successfully differentiated between distinct USH groups. However, varying degrees of vestibular dysfunction were observed across all groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信