Ana Margarida Amorim, Ana Beatriz Ramada, Ana Cristina Lopes, Hugo Barcelos Figueiredo, João Lemos, João Carlos Ribeiro
{"title":"35例欧洲Usher综合征患者前庭表型-基因型相关性分析","authors":"Ana Margarida Amorim, Ana Beatriz Ramada, Ana Cristina Lopes, Hugo Barcelos Figueiredo, João Lemos, João Carlos Ribeiro","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate genotype-phenotype correlations in Usher syndrome (USH).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-five USH patients were included, categorized into three genetic-based groups: USH1 (<i>n</i> = 11), USH2 (<i>n</i> = 22), and USH4 (<i>n</i> = 2). The functional and emotional impact of dizziness and equilibrium was assessed using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Participants underwent pure-tone threshold testing, bithermal caloric testing, rotary chair testing (RCT), video head impulse test (vHIT), ocular (oVEMP) and cervical (cVEMP) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and posturography. Genotype-phenotype associations were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total DHI could only distinguish USH1 (25.71 ± 21.04) from USH2 (50.13 ± 22.54, <i>p</i> = .024) but not between the three groups (<i>p</i> = .084). ABC and HADS could not also distinguish between the three USH subgroups (<i>p</i> = .286 and .180). Hearing loss in USH1 was significantly greater than in USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed greater caloric weakness than USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .004). RCT was not completed in USH4 but could distinguish between USH1 and USH2 (sinus 0.16 Hz, <i>p</i> = .033; sinus 0.32 Hz, <i>p</i> = .011; and sinus 0.64 Hz, <i>p</i> = .003). vHIT in USH1 demonstrated lower overall gain than in USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed higher number of absent cVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2/USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed a higher number of absent oVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2 and USH4 (right ear, <i>p</i> < .007; left ear, <i>p</i> < .023). In posturography, no relevant differences were found between the three USH groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contemporary hearing and vestibular assessment successfully differentiated between distinct USH groups. However, varying degrees of vestibular dysfunction were observed across all groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vestibular Phenotype-Genotype Correlation in a Cohort of 35 European Usher Syndrome Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Margarida Amorim, Ana Beatriz Ramada, Ana Cristina Lopes, Hugo Barcelos Figueiredo, João Lemos, João Carlos Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate genotype-phenotype correlations in Usher syndrome (USH).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-five USH patients were included, categorized into three genetic-based groups: USH1 (<i>n</i> = 11), USH2 (<i>n</i> = 22), and USH4 (<i>n</i> = 2). The functional and emotional impact of dizziness and equilibrium was assessed using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Participants underwent pure-tone threshold testing, bithermal caloric testing, rotary chair testing (RCT), video head impulse test (vHIT), ocular (oVEMP) and cervical (cVEMP) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and posturography. Genotype-phenotype associations were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total DHI could only distinguish USH1 (25.71 ± 21.04) from USH2 (50.13 ± 22.54, <i>p</i> = .024) but not between the three groups (<i>p</i> = .084). ABC and HADS could not also distinguish between the three USH subgroups (<i>p</i> = .286 and .180). Hearing loss in USH1 was significantly greater than in USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed greater caloric weakness than USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .004). RCT was not completed in USH4 but could distinguish between USH1 and USH2 (sinus 0.16 Hz, <i>p</i> = .033; sinus 0.32 Hz, <i>p</i> = .011; and sinus 0.64 Hz, <i>p</i> = .003). vHIT in USH1 demonstrated lower overall gain than in USH2 and USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed higher number of absent cVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2/USH4 (<i>p</i> < .001). USH1 showed a higher number of absent oVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2 and USH4 (right ear, <i>p</i> < .007; left ear, <i>p</i> < .023). In posturography, no relevant differences were found between the three USH groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contemporary hearing and vestibular assessment successfully differentiated between distinct USH groups. However, varying degrees of vestibular dysfunction were observed across all groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00194\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vestibular Phenotype-Genotype Correlation in a Cohort of 35 European Usher Syndrome Patients.
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate genotype-phenotype correlations in Usher syndrome (USH).
Method: Thirty-five USH patients were included, categorized into three genetic-based groups: USH1 (n = 11), USH2 (n = 22), and USH4 (n = 2). The functional and emotional impact of dizziness and equilibrium was assessed using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Participants underwent pure-tone threshold testing, bithermal caloric testing, rotary chair testing (RCT), video head impulse test (vHIT), ocular (oVEMP) and cervical (cVEMP) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and posturography. Genotype-phenotype associations were analyzed.
Results: Total DHI could only distinguish USH1 (25.71 ± 21.04) from USH2 (50.13 ± 22.54, p = .024) but not between the three groups (p = .084). ABC and HADS could not also distinguish between the three USH subgroups (p = .286 and .180). Hearing loss in USH1 was significantly greater than in USH2 and USH4 (p < .001). USH1 showed greater caloric weakness than USH2 and USH4 (p < .004). RCT was not completed in USH4 but could distinguish between USH1 and USH2 (sinus 0.16 Hz, p = .033; sinus 0.32 Hz, p = .011; and sinus 0.64 Hz, p = .003). vHIT in USH1 demonstrated lower overall gain than in USH2 and USH4 (p < .001). USH1 showed higher number of absent cVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2/USH4 (p < .001). USH1 showed a higher number of absent oVEMP responses in the right and/or left ear when compared to USH2 and USH4 (right ear, p < .007; left ear, p < .023). In posturography, no relevant differences were found between the three USH groups.
Conclusions: Contemporary hearing and vestibular assessment successfully differentiated between distinct USH groups. However, varying degrees of vestibular dysfunction were observed across all groups.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.