Amy Longtin, Marina M Watowich, Baptiste Sadoughi, Rachel M Petersen, Sarah F Brosnan, Kenneth Buetow, Qiuyin Cai, Michael D Gurven, James P Higham, Heather M Highland, Yi-Ting Huang, Hillard Kaplan, Thomas S Kraft, Yvonne A L Lim, Jirong Long, Amanda D Melin, Michael J Montague, Jamie Roberson, Kee Seong Ng, Michael L Platt, India A Schneider-Crease, Jonathan Stieglitz, Benjamin C Trumble, Vivek V Venkataraman, Ian J Wallace, Jie Wu, Noah Snyder-Mackler, Angela Jones, Alexander G Bick, Amanda J Lea
{"title":"高通量酶促DNA甲基化测序的高性价比解决方案。","authors":"Amy Longtin, Marina M Watowich, Baptiste Sadoughi, Rachel M Petersen, Sarah F Brosnan, Kenneth Buetow, Qiuyin Cai, Michael D Gurven, James P Higham, Heather M Highland, Yi-Ting Huang, Hillard Kaplan, Thomas S Kraft, Yvonne A L Lim, Jirong Long, Amanda D Melin, Michael J Montague, Jamie Roberson, Kee Seong Ng, Michael L Platt, India A Schneider-Crease, Jonathan Stieglitz, Benjamin C Trumble, Vivek V Venkataraman, Ian J Wallace, Jie Wu, Noah Snyder-Mackler, Angela Jones, Alexander G Bick, Amanda J Lea","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Characterizing DNA methylation patterns is important for addressing key questions in evolutionary biology, development, geroscience, and medical genomics. While costs are decreasing, whole-genome DNA methylation profiling remains prohibitively expensive for most population-scale studies, creating a need for cost-effective, reduced representation approaches (i.e., assays that rely on microarrays, enzyme digests, or sequence capture to target a subset of the genome). Most common whole genome and reduced representation techniques rely on bisulfite conversion, which can damage DNA resulting in DNA loss and sequencing biases. Enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-seq) was recently proposed to overcome these issues, but thorough benchmarking of EM-seq combined with cost-effective, reduced representation strategies is currently lacking. To address this gap, we optimized the Targeted Methylation Sequencing protocol (TMS)-which profiles ~4 million CpG sites-for miniaturization, flexibility, and multispecies use. First, we tested modifications to increase throughput and reduce cost, including increasing multiplexing, decreasing DNA input, and using enzymatic rather than mechanical fragmentation to prepare DNA. Second, we compared our optimized TMS protocol to commonly used techniques, specifically the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip (n = 55 paired samples) and whole genome bisulfite sequencing (n = 6 paired samples). In both cases, we found strong agreement between technologies (R2 = 0.97 and 0.99, respectively). Third, we tested the optimized TMS protocol in three non-human primate species (rhesus macaques, geladas, and capuchins). We captured a high percentage (mean = 77.1%) of targeted CpG sites and produced methylation level estimates that agreed with those generated from reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (R2 = 0.98). Finally, we confirmed that estimates of 1) epigenetic age and 2) tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns are strongly recapitulated using data generated from TMS versus other technologies. Altogether, our optimized TMS protocol will enable cost-effective, population-scale studies of genome-wide DNA methylation levels across human and non-human primate species.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"21 5","pages":"e1011667"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effective solutions for high-throughput enzymatic DNA methylation sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Longtin, Marina M Watowich, Baptiste Sadoughi, Rachel M Petersen, Sarah F Brosnan, Kenneth Buetow, Qiuyin Cai, Michael D Gurven, James P Higham, Heather M Highland, Yi-Ting Huang, Hillard Kaplan, Thomas S Kraft, Yvonne A L Lim, Jirong Long, Amanda D Melin, Michael J Montague, Jamie Roberson, Kee Seong Ng, Michael L Platt, India A Schneider-Crease, Jonathan Stieglitz, Benjamin C Trumble, Vivek V Venkataraman, Ian J Wallace, Jie Wu, Noah Snyder-Mackler, Angela Jones, Alexander G Bick, Amanda J Lea\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Characterizing DNA methylation patterns is important for addressing key questions in evolutionary biology, development, geroscience, and medical genomics. While costs are decreasing, whole-genome DNA methylation profiling remains prohibitively expensive for most population-scale studies, creating a need for cost-effective, reduced representation approaches (i.e., assays that rely on microarrays, enzyme digests, or sequence capture to target a subset of the genome). Most common whole genome and reduced representation techniques rely on bisulfite conversion, which can damage DNA resulting in DNA loss and sequencing biases. Enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-seq) was recently proposed to overcome these issues, but thorough benchmarking of EM-seq combined with cost-effective, reduced representation strategies is currently lacking. To address this gap, we optimized the Targeted Methylation Sequencing protocol (TMS)-which profiles ~4 million CpG sites-for miniaturization, flexibility, and multispecies use. First, we tested modifications to increase throughput and reduce cost, including increasing multiplexing, decreasing DNA input, and using enzymatic rather than mechanical fragmentation to prepare DNA. Second, we compared our optimized TMS protocol to commonly used techniques, specifically the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip (n = 55 paired samples) and whole genome bisulfite sequencing (n = 6 paired samples). In both cases, we found strong agreement between technologies (R2 = 0.97 and 0.99, respectively). Third, we tested the optimized TMS protocol in three non-human primate species (rhesus macaques, geladas, and capuchins). We captured a high percentage (mean = 77.1%) of targeted CpG sites and produced methylation level estimates that agreed with those generated from reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (R2 = 0.98). Finally, we confirmed that estimates of 1) epigenetic age and 2) tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns are strongly recapitulated using data generated from TMS versus other technologies. Altogether, our optimized TMS protocol will enable cost-effective, population-scale studies of genome-wide DNA methylation levels across human and non-human primate species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Genetics\",\"volume\":\"21 5\",\"pages\":\"e1011667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011667\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cost-effective solutions for high-throughput enzymatic DNA methylation sequencing.
Characterizing DNA methylation patterns is important for addressing key questions in evolutionary biology, development, geroscience, and medical genomics. While costs are decreasing, whole-genome DNA methylation profiling remains prohibitively expensive for most population-scale studies, creating a need for cost-effective, reduced representation approaches (i.e., assays that rely on microarrays, enzyme digests, or sequence capture to target a subset of the genome). Most common whole genome and reduced representation techniques rely on bisulfite conversion, which can damage DNA resulting in DNA loss and sequencing biases. Enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-seq) was recently proposed to overcome these issues, but thorough benchmarking of EM-seq combined with cost-effective, reduced representation strategies is currently lacking. To address this gap, we optimized the Targeted Methylation Sequencing protocol (TMS)-which profiles ~4 million CpG sites-for miniaturization, flexibility, and multispecies use. First, we tested modifications to increase throughput and reduce cost, including increasing multiplexing, decreasing DNA input, and using enzymatic rather than mechanical fragmentation to prepare DNA. Second, we compared our optimized TMS protocol to commonly used techniques, specifically the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip (n = 55 paired samples) and whole genome bisulfite sequencing (n = 6 paired samples). In both cases, we found strong agreement between technologies (R2 = 0.97 and 0.99, respectively). Third, we tested the optimized TMS protocol in three non-human primate species (rhesus macaques, geladas, and capuchins). We captured a high percentage (mean = 77.1%) of targeted CpG sites and produced methylation level estimates that agreed with those generated from reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (R2 = 0.98). Finally, we confirmed that estimates of 1) epigenetic age and 2) tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns are strongly recapitulated using data generated from TMS versus other technologies. Altogether, our optimized TMS protocol will enable cost-effective, population-scale studies of genome-wide DNA methylation levels across human and non-human primate species.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.