研究生对药学教育质量满意度的影响因素:来自越南某大学的证据。

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-04-29 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13030062
Do Xuan Thang, Nguyen Viet Hung, Vu Tran Anh, Vu Thi Quynh Mai, Le Thu Thuy, Cuc Thi Thu Nguyen, Trung Nguyen Duc, Dang Viet Hung
{"title":"研究生对药学教育质量满意度的影响因素:来自越南某大学的证据。","authors":"Do Xuan Thang, Nguyen Viet Hung, Vu Tran Anh, Vu Thi Quynh Mai, Le Thu Thuy, Cuc Thi Thu Nguyen, Trung Nguyen Duc, Dang Viet Hung","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13030062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to investigate the determinants of pharmacy postgraduates' satisfaction to suggest essential recommendations to enhance educational quality at Hanoi University of Pharmacy in Vietnam. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 202 postgraduates using structured questionnaires, with 31 multidimensional questions and 1 question addressing overall satisfaction. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the questionnaire's internal consistency, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) identified key factors, and multiple linear regression analysis was applied to assess the impact of these factors. Overall satisfaction had a high mean score of 4.49 out of 5 (SD = 0.602). The final 29 questions were retained and divided into four main factors affecting satisfaction after rotating EFA. The dimension of \"Support and Evaluation\" was the most influential factor (β = 0.475), followed by \"Training Organization\", \"Facilities and Library\", and \"Lecturers and Curriculum\". The variables with the lowest scores needed much more attention, including digital systems (4.2, SD = 0.852), information technology support (4.32, SD = 0.772), activities boosting lifelong learning skills (4.48, SD = 0.624), and the reasonability of the education program's structure (4.48, SD = 0.608) and the studying program's schedule (4.45, SD = 0.607). The findings indicate the issues that should be addressed, and have highlighted that improvements in electronic library accessibility and updated curricula are also recommended to further optimize the educational experience of postgraduate students.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influential Factors on Postgraduates' Satisfaction with the Quality of Pharmacy Education: Evidence from a University in Vietnam.\",\"authors\":\"Do Xuan Thang, Nguyen Viet Hung, Vu Tran Anh, Vu Thi Quynh Mai, Le Thu Thuy, Cuc Thi Thu Nguyen, Trung Nguyen Duc, Dang Viet Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pharmacy13030062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study aimed to investigate the determinants of pharmacy postgraduates' satisfaction to suggest essential recommendations to enhance educational quality at Hanoi University of Pharmacy in Vietnam. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 202 postgraduates using structured questionnaires, with 31 multidimensional questions and 1 question addressing overall satisfaction. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the questionnaire's internal consistency, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) identified key factors, and multiple linear regression analysis was applied to assess the impact of these factors. Overall satisfaction had a high mean score of 4.49 out of 5 (SD = 0.602). The final 29 questions were retained and divided into four main factors affecting satisfaction after rotating EFA. The dimension of \\\"Support and Evaluation\\\" was the most influential factor (β = 0.475), followed by \\\"Training Organization\\\", \\\"Facilities and Library\\\", and \\\"Lecturers and Curriculum\\\". The variables with the lowest scores needed much more attention, including digital systems (4.2, SD = 0.852), information technology support (4.32, SD = 0.772), activities boosting lifelong learning skills (4.48, SD = 0.624), and the reasonability of the education program's structure (4.48, SD = 0.608) and the studying program's schedule (4.45, SD = 0.607). The findings indicate the issues that should be addressed, and have highlighted that improvements in electronic library accessibility and updated curricula are also recommended to further optimize the educational experience of postgraduate students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13030062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13030062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨影响越南河内药学院药学研究生满意度的因素,为提高其教育质量提供必要的建议。对202名研究生进行了横断面调查,采用结构化问卷,包含31个多维问题和1个总体满意度问题。采用Cronbach’s alpha评价问卷的内部一致性,探索性因子分析(Exploratory Factor Analysis, EFA)确定关键因素,并采用多元线性回归分析评估这些因素的影响。总体满意度的平均得分为4.49分(SD = 0.602)。最后的29个问题被保留下来,并被分为四个主要因素,在轮换全民教育后影响满意度。“支持和评价”维度是影响最大的因素(β = 0.475),其次是“培训机构”、“设施和图书馆”和“讲师和课程”。得分最低的变量包括数字系统(4.2,SD = 0.852)、信息技术支持(4.32,SD = 0.772)、促进终身学习技能的活动(4.48,SD = 0.624)、教育计划结构的合理性(4.48,SD = 0.608)和学习计划的时间表(4.45,SD = 0.607)。调查结果指出了应解决的问题,并强调建议改进电子图书馆的可及性和更新课程,以进一步优化研究生的教育体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influential Factors on Postgraduates' Satisfaction with the Quality of Pharmacy Education: Evidence from a University in Vietnam.

The study aimed to investigate the determinants of pharmacy postgraduates' satisfaction to suggest essential recommendations to enhance educational quality at Hanoi University of Pharmacy in Vietnam. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 202 postgraduates using structured questionnaires, with 31 multidimensional questions and 1 question addressing overall satisfaction. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the questionnaire's internal consistency, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) identified key factors, and multiple linear regression analysis was applied to assess the impact of these factors. Overall satisfaction had a high mean score of 4.49 out of 5 (SD = 0.602). The final 29 questions were retained and divided into four main factors affecting satisfaction after rotating EFA. The dimension of "Support and Evaluation" was the most influential factor (β = 0.475), followed by "Training Organization", "Facilities and Library", and "Lecturers and Curriculum". The variables with the lowest scores needed much more attention, including digital systems (4.2, SD = 0.852), information technology support (4.32, SD = 0.772), activities boosting lifelong learning skills (4.48, SD = 0.624), and the reasonability of the education program's structure (4.48, SD = 0.608) and the studying program's schedule (4.45, SD = 0.607). The findings indicate the issues that should be addressed, and have highlighted that improvements in electronic library accessibility and updated curricula are also recommended to further optimize the educational experience of postgraduate students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信