自给农业社区在气候驱动风险下的缩减。

IF 3.2 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Population and Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-20 DOI:10.1007/s11111-025-00493-8
Nicolas Choquette-Levy, Dirgha Ghimire, Michael Oppenheimer, Rajendra Ghimire, Dil Ck
{"title":"自给农业社区在气候驱动风险下的缩减。","authors":"Nicolas Choquette-Levy, Dirgha Ghimire, Michael Oppenheimer, Rajendra Ghimire, Dil Ck","doi":"10.1007/s11111-025-00493-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing climate risks introduce new sources of uncertainty to smallholder farmers' livelihood decisions. While farmers in different development contexts tend to accurately perceive long-term climatic trends, livelihood diversification as a climate resilience strategy has generally lagged behind awareness of climate risks. In this study, we investigate potential mechanisms behind this lagged response through a survey of 500 farming households in Nepal's Chitwan Valley, a region that is highly dependent on subsistence agriculture and highly exposed to several climate-driven hazards. Specifically, we employ a suite of cross-sectional and time series econometric techniques to analyze how farmers' information sources, social capital, and previous exposure to climate hazards shape climate risk perceptions and livelihood decisions. We find that climate-driven risks are highly salient to household perceptions of farming risks; however, they also drive higher perceived risks of common livelihood diversification strategies, including rural-urban migration and off-farm employment. Further, while farming households generally maintain diversified income portfolios, exposure to droughts and/or floods leads to persistent increases in the reliance on farming income, which we term a \"retrenchment\" response. We find evidence for both financial and psychological mechanisms behind this response, which may exacerbate environmentally driven poverty traps. Our results indicate that efforts to build farmers' resilience to climate risks should especially account for perceived risks of livelihood alternatives, financial constraints, and loss-averse behavior in response to income shocks.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11111-025-00493-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":47692,"journal":{"name":"Population and Environment","volume":"47 2","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrenchment under climate-driven risks in subsistence farming communities.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Choquette-Levy, Dirgha Ghimire, Michael Oppenheimer, Rajendra Ghimire, Dil Ck\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11111-025-00493-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increasing climate risks introduce new sources of uncertainty to smallholder farmers' livelihood decisions. While farmers in different development contexts tend to accurately perceive long-term climatic trends, livelihood diversification as a climate resilience strategy has generally lagged behind awareness of climate risks. In this study, we investigate potential mechanisms behind this lagged response through a survey of 500 farming households in Nepal's Chitwan Valley, a region that is highly dependent on subsistence agriculture and highly exposed to several climate-driven hazards. Specifically, we employ a suite of cross-sectional and time series econometric techniques to analyze how farmers' information sources, social capital, and previous exposure to climate hazards shape climate risk perceptions and livelihood decisions. We find that climate-driven risks are highly salient to household perceptions of farming risks; however, they also drive higher perceived risks of common livelihood diversification strategies, including rural-urban migration and off-farm employment. Further, while farming households generally maintain diversified income portfolios, exposure to droughts and/or floods leads to persistent increases in the reliance on farming income, which we term a \\\"retrenchment\\\" response. We find evidence for both financial and psychological mechanisms behind this response, which may exacerbate environmentally driven poverty traps. Our results indicate that efforts to build farmers' resilience to climate risks should especially account for perceived risks of livelihood alternatives, financial constraints, and loss-averse behavior in response to income shocks.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11111-025-00493-8.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population and Environment\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-025-00493-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-025-00493-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日益增加的气候风险给小农的生计决策带来了新的不确定性。虽然不同发展背景下的农民倾向于准确地感知长期气候趋势,但生计多样化作为一种气候适应战略,通常落后于对气候风险的认识。在本研究中,我们通过对尼泊尔奇旺河谷500户农户的调查,探讨了这种滞后反应背后的潜在机制。奇旺河谷是一个高度依赖自给农业、高度暴露于多种气候驱动灾害的地区。具体而言,我们采用了一套横断面和时间序列计量经济学技术来分析农民的信息来源、社会资本和以前对气候危害的暴露如何影响气候风险认知和生计决策。我们发现,气候驱动的风险对家庭对农业风险的认知非常显著;然而,它们也增加了共同生计多样化战略的感知风险,包括农村向城市迁移和非农就业。此外,虽然农户通常保持多样化的收入组合,但遭受干旱和/或洪水的影响导致对农业收入的依赖持续增加,我们称之为“紧缩”反应。我们发现了这种反应背后的经济和心理机制的证据,这可能会加剧环境驱动的贫困陷阱。我们的研究结果表明,建立农民应对气候风险的韧性的努力应特别考虑到生计选择的感知风险、财务约束和应对收入冲击的损失规避行为。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s11111-025-00493-8获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrenchment under climate-driven risks in subsistence farming communities.

Increasing climate risks introduce new sources of uncertainty to smallholder farmers' livelihood decisions. While farmers in different development contexts tend to accurately perceive long-term climatic trends, livelihood diversification as a climate resilience strategy has generally lagged behind awareness of climate risks. In this study, we investigate potential mechanisms behind this lagged response through a survey of 500 farming households in Nepal's Chitwan Valley, a region that is highly dependent on subsistence agriculture and highly exposed to several climate-driven hazards. Specifically, we employ a suite of cross-sectional and time series econometric techniques to analyze how farmers' information sources, social capital, and previous exposure to climate hazards shape climate risk perceptions and livelihood decisions. We find that climate-driven risks are highly salient to household perceptions of farming risks; however, they also drive higher perceived risks of common livelihood diversification strategies, including rural-urban migration and off-farm employment. Further, while farming households generally maintain diversified income portfolios, exposure to droughts and/or floods leads to persistent increases in the reliance on farming income, which we term a "retrenchment" response. We find evidence for both financial and psychological mechanisms behind this response, which may exacerbate environmentally driven poverty traps. Our results indicate that efforts to build farmers' resilience to climate risks should especially account for perceived risks of livelihood alternatives, financial constraints, and loss-averse behavior in response to income shocks.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11111-025-00493-8.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Population & Environment is the sole social science journal focused on interdisciplinary research on social demographic aspects of environmental issues. The journal publishes cutting-edge research that contributes new insights on the complex, reciprocal links between human populations and the natural environment in all regions and countries of the world. Quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods contributions are welcome. Disciplines commonly represented in the journal include demography, geography, sociology, human ecology, environmental economics, public health, anthropology and environmental studies. The journal publishes original research, research brief, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信