更高的动机和快乐分数预示着更依赖于无模型决策。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Swathi K Karthik, Katherine M K Pereira, Adam J Culbreth, Deanna M Barch, Erin K Moran
{"title":"更高的动机和快乐分数预示着更依赖于无模型决策。","authors":"Swathi K Karthik, Katherine M K Pereira, Adam J Culbreth, Deanna M Barch, Erin K Moran","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01302-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decision making is driven by factors such as motivation, pleasure, and cognitive skill. The current study evaluates how these factors are related to decision making in a community population. In recent years, work in the field of reinforcement learning has identified two main pathways that drive decision making: model-based and model-free learning. Model-free learning updates action values retrospectively, after a reward is received. In contrast, model-based learning updates action values prospectively, by weighing contextual factors, the overall structure of the situation, and reward received. The current study utilizes a two-stage decision-making task to assess the relative contribution of model-free versus model-based learning in relation to measures that assess motivation, pleasure, and cognition in a community sample (n = 127). Generalized linear mixed-effect models showed that individuals high in motivation and pleasure had significantly greater reliance on model-free decision making (p = 0.0267). In contrast, individuals with better working memory, as measured by a running span task, had significantly greater reliance on model-based learning (p = 0.0003). These findings provide evidence that individual differences in motivation and cognition are associated with reliance on particular learning pathways. It has been suggested that lower levels of motivation, pleasure, and cognition in various forms of psychopathology (e.g., depression) can impair decision making. Our results show these relationships transcend clinical contexts. Specifically, these findings suggest that individuals who experience low motivation and pleasure may be less sensitive to immediate rewards, and that working memory capacity is highly relevant to model-based learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1261-1272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher motivation and pleasure scores predict more reliance on model-free decision making.\",\"authors\":\"Swathi K Karthik, Katherine M K Pereira, Adam J Culbreth, Deanna M Barch, Erin K Moran\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13415-025-01302-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Decision making is driven by factors such as motivation, pleasure, and cognitive skill. The current study evaluates how these factors are related to decision making in a community population. In recent years, work in the field of reinforcement learning has identified two main pathways that drive decision making: model-based and model-free learning. Model-free learning updates action values retrospectively, after a reward is received. In contrast, model-based learning updates action values prospectively, by weighing contextual factors, the overall structure of the situation, and reward received. The current study utilizes a two-stage decision-making task to assess the relative contribution of model-free versus model-based learning in relation to measures that assess motivation, pleasure, and cognition in a community sample (n = 127). Generalized linear mixed-effect models showed that individuals high in motivation and pleasure had significantly greater reliance on model-free decision making (p = 0.0267). In contrast, individuals with better working memory, as measured by a running span task, had significantly greater reliance on model-based learning (p = 0.0003). These findings provide evidence that individual differences in motivation and cognition are associated with reliance on particular learning pathways. It has been suggested that lower levels of motivation, pleasure, and cognition in various forms of psychopathology (e.g., depression) can impair decision making. Our results show these relationships transcend clinical contexts. Specifically, these findings suggest that individuals who experience low motivation and pleasure may be less sensitive to immediate rewards, and that working memory capacity is highly relevant to model-based learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1261-1272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01302-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01302-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

决策是由动机、快乐和认知技能等因素驱动的。目前的研究评估了这些因素如何与社区人口的决策有关。近年来,强化学习领域的工作已经确定了驱动决策的两种主要途径:基于模型的学习和无模型的学习。在获得奖励后,无模型学习可以回顾性地更新行为值。相比之下,基于模型的学习通过权衡上下文因素、情况的整体结构和获得的奖励,前瞻性地更新行为价值。目前的研究利用两阶段决策任务来评估无模型与基于模型的学习在评估社区样本(n = 127)中的动机、愉悦和认知方面的相对贡献。广义线性混合效应模型显示,动机和快乐程度高的个体对无模型决策的依赖程度显著更高(p = 0.0267)。相比之下,工作记忆较好的个体,通过运行跨度任务来衡量,对基于模型的学习有更大的依赖(p = 0.0003)。这些发现为动机和认知的个体差异与对特定学习途径的依赖有关提供了证据。有研究表明,在各种形式的精神病理(如抑郁症)中,动机、愉悦和认知水平较低会损害决策。我们的研究结果表明,这些关系超越了临床背景。具体来说,这些发现表明,经历低动机和快乐的个体可能对即时奖励不太敏感,工作记忆容量与基于模型的学习高度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Higher motivation and pleasure scores predict more reliance on model-free decision making.

Decision making is driven by factors such as motivation, pleasure, and cognitive skill. The current study evaluates how these factors are related to decision making in a community population. In recent years, work in the field of reinforcement learning has identified two main pathways that drive decision making: model-based and model-free learning. Model-free learning updates action values retrospectively, after a reward is received. In contrast, model-based learning updates action values prospectively, by weighing contextual factors, the overall structure of the situation, and reward received. The current study utilizes a two-stage decision-making task to assess the relative contribution of model-free versus model-based learning in relation to measures that assess motivation, pleasure, and cognition in a community sample (n = 127). Generalized linear mixed-effect models showed that individuals high in motivation and pleasure had significantly greater reliance on model-free decision making (p = 0.0267). In contrast, individuals with better working memory, as measured by a running span task, had significantly greater reliance on model-based learning (p = 0.0003). These findings provide evidence that individual differences in motivation and cognition are associated with reliance on particular learning pathways. It has been suggested that lower levels of motivation, pleasure, and cognition in various forms of psychopathology (e.g., depression) can impair decision making. Our results show these relationships transcend clinical contexts. Specifically, these findings suggest that individuals who experience low motivation and pleasure may be less sensitive to immediate rewards, and that working memory capacity is highly relevant to model-based learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信