利益相关者利益平衡:平衡计分卡视角下的中国公立医院绩效考核实施。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Shufang Yao, Shaozhuang Ma, Lishuo Shi, Fang Wu, Elizabeth Reis
{"title":"利益相关者利益平衡:平衡计分卡视角下的中国公立医院绩效考核实施。","authors":"Shufang Yao, Shaozhuang Ma, Lishuo Shi, Fang Wu, Elizabeth Reis","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2019, the Chinese government initiated a National Performance Appraisal for Tertiary Public Hospitals (the 'National Appraisal'), but limited study has been conducted on its appraisal indicators and its implementation effects. This study aims to assess how well this system balances the interests of key stakeholders in Chinese public hospitals and examines the positive changes and concurrent challenges it has brought to hospital operations. Utilising stakeholder theory and the balanced scorecard, we conducted two rounds of Delphi consultations with experts (N<sub>1</sub> = 46, N<sub>2</sub> = 29). We also analysed archival data from three hospitals' 'National Appraisal' records covering 2018 to 2020. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 41) with key stakeholders from these hospitals. Kendall's coefficient of concordance was employed in both rounds to gauge the agreement among experts and thematic analysis was applied to analyse data from in-depth interviews with the key stakeholders of the three sampled hospitals. The results show that: (1) The key stakeholders of Chinese public hospitals include patients, hospital executives, health care workers, health authorities, and the public, but the 'National Appraisal' indicators only cover the first three stakeholders; (2) The 'National Appraisal' system adopted a balanced scorecard approach, patient-centre and with emphases on internal process; (3) The 'National Appraisal' had positive impacts on hospitals, clarifying hospital strategy and prioritising the public roles, enhancing health care quality, safety, and efficiency, as well as patient and health care worker satisfaction. However, implementation challenges arise from resource constraints, discrepancy between appraisal indicators and patient needs, misalignment between appraisal indicators and doctor's patient care practices, and the tension between nationwide standardized appraisal and local context. This study significantly contributes to the literature by empirically examining performance appraisal implementation in an under-researched country's public hospitals, offering practical implications and policy recommendations for practitioners, managers, and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Stakeholder Interests: A Balanced Scorecard Perspective on Performance Appraisal Implementation in China's Public Hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Shufang Yao, Shaozhuang Ma, Lishuo Shi, Fang Wu, Elizabeth Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2019, the Chinese government initiated a National Performance Appraisal for Tertiary Public Hospitals (the 'National Appraisal'), but limited study has been conducted on its appraisal indicators and its implementation effects. This study aims to assess how well this system balances the interests of key stakeholders in Chinese public hospitals and examines the positive changes and concurrent challenges it has brought to hospital operations. Utilising stakeholder theory and the balanced scorecard, we conducted two rounds of Delphi consultations with experts (N<sub>1</sub> = 46, N<sub>2</sub> = 29). We also analysed archival data from three hospitals' 'National Appraisal' records covering 2018 to 2020. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 41) with key stakeholders from these hospitals. Kendall's coefficient of concordance was employed in both rounds to gauge the agreement among experts and thematic analysis was applied to analyse data from in-depth interviews with the key stakeholders of the three sampled hospitals. The results show that: (1) The key stakeholders of Chinese public hospitals include patients, hospital executives, health care workers, health authorities, and the public, but the 'National Appraisal' indicators only cover the first three stakeholders; (2) The 'National Appraisal' system adopted a balanced scorecard approach, patient-centre and with emphases on internal process; (3) The 'National Appraisal' had positive impacts on hospitals, clarifying hospital strategy and prioritising the public roles, enhancing health care quality, safety, and efficiency, as well as patient and health care worker satisfaction. However, implementation challenges arise from resource constraints, discrepancy between appraisal indicators and patient needs, misalignment between appraisal indicators and doctor's patient care practices, and the tension between nationwide standardized appraisal and local context. This study significantly contributes to the literature by empirically examining performance appraisal implementation in an under-researched country's public hospitals, offering practical implications and policy recommendations for practitioners, managers, and policymakers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3948\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年,中国政府启动了国家三级公立医院绩效评估(简称“国家评估”),但对其评估指标和实施效果的研究有限。本研究旨在评估该系统在中国公立医院中如何平衡主要利益相关者的利益,并研究它给医院运营带来的积极变化和同时存在的挑战。利用利益相关者理论和平衡计分卡,我们与专家进行了两轮德尔菲咨询(N1 = 46, N2 = 29)。我们还分析了三家医院2018年至2020年“国家鉴定”记录的档案数据。此外,我们对这些医院的主要利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈(N = 41)。在两轮中,采用肯德尔的一致性系数来衡量专家之间的协议,并应用主题分析来分析与三家抽样医院的主要利益相关者进行深入访谈的数据。结果表明:(1)中国公立医院的关键利益相关者包括患者、医院管理层、医护人员、卫生部门和公众,但“国家评价”指标仅涵盖了前三个利益相关者;(2)“国家评估”系统采用平衡计分卡方法,以患者为中心,强调内部流程;(3)“国家评价”对医院有积极影响,明确了医院战略和公共角色的优先次序,提高了医疗质量、安全和效率,以及患者和医护人员的满意度。然而,由于资源的限制,评估指标与患者需求的差异,评估指标与医生对患者的护理实践的不一致,以及全国标准化评估与当地情况的紧张关系,在实施过程中面临挑战。本研究通过对一个研究不足的国家公立医院绩效考核实施情况的实证研究,为从业者、管理者和政策制定者提供了实际意义和政策建议,对文献有重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing Stakeholder Interests: A Balanced Scorecard Perspective on Performance Appraisal Implementation in China's Public Hospitals.

In 2019, the Chinese government initiated a National Performance Appraisal for Tertiary Public Hospitals (the 'National Appraisal'), but limited study has been conducted on its appraisal indicators and its implementation effects. This study aims to assess how well this system balances the interests of key stakeholders in Chinese public hospitals and examines the positive changes and concurrent challenges it has brought to hospital operations. Utilising stakeholder theory and the balanced scorecard, we conducted two rounds of Delphi consultations with experts (N1 = 46, N2 = 29). We also analysed archival data from three hospitals' 'National Appraisal' records covering 2018 to 2020. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 41) with key stakeholders from these hospitals. Kendall's coefficient of concordance was employed in both rounds to gauge the agreement among experts and thematic analysis was applied to analyse data from in-depth interviews with the key stakeholders of the three sampled hospitals. The results show that: (1) The key stakeholders of Chinese public hospitals include patients, hospital executives, health care workers, health authorities, and the public, but the 'National Appraisal' indicators only cover the first three stakeholders; (2) The 'National Appraisal' system adopted a balanced scorecard approach, patient-centre and with emphases on internal process; (3) The 'National Appraisal' had positive impacts on hospitals, clarifying hospital strategy and prioritising the public roles, enhancing health care quality, safety, and efficiency, as well as patient and health care worker satisfaction. However, implementation challenges arise from resource constraints, discrepancy between appraisal indicators and patient needs, misalignment between appraisal indicators and doctor's patient care practices, and the tension between nationwide standardized appraisal and local context. This study significantly contributes to the literature by empirically examining performance appraisal implementation in an under-researched country's public hospitals, offering practical implications and policy recommendations for practitioners, managers, and policymakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信