Joao Correia Anacleto, Carlos Mavioso, David Gomes Pinto, Pedro Gouveia, Marcio Debiasi, Ljuba Morando, Maria Joao Cardoso
{"title":"脂肪筋膜外侧肋间穿支皮瓣在部分乳房再造术中的应用。","authors":"Joao Correia Anacleto, Carlos Mavioso, David Gomes Pinto, Pedro Gouveia, Marcio Debiasi, Ljuba Morando, Maria Joao Cardoso","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lateral intercostal artery perforator flap, first described by Hamdi et al as a partial replacement technique for breast-conserving surgery (BCS), was traditionally a fasciocutaneous flap with the inherent skin scar on the lateral chest wall. Trying to limit donor site morbidity, we further modified the original lateral intercostal artery perforator flap, harvesting tissue on the same perforator without the skin paddle, the associated scar, and the need to reposition the patient on the operating table.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients who underwent partial breast replacement after BCS between 2015 and 2020. We compared the 27 patients with the adipofascial lateral intercostal perforator flap (ALIP) with the remaining 25 replacement flaps regarding postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increased number of postoperative seromas were detected in the ALIP group according to the Clavien-Dindo classification; however, most of them were minor and did not delay adjuvant treatments or compromise cosmetic results. The aesthetic outcome evaluated through the Web BCCT.core workstation 1 year after surgery was shown to be identical between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ALIP represents an alternative flap for tissue replacement in BCS, achieving overall similar complication rates and identical aesthetic outcomes when compared with other local perforator flaps, with reduced skin scars.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 5","pages":"e6811"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Adipofascial Lateral Intercostal Perforator Flap in Partial Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Joao Correia Anacleto, Carlos Mavioso, David Gomes Pinto, Pedro Gouveia, Marcio Debiasi, Ljuba Morando, Maria Joao Cardoso\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lateral intercostal artery perforator flap, first described by Hamdi et al as a partial replacement technique for breast-conserving surgery (BCS), was traditionally a fasciocutaneous flap with the inherent skin scar on the lateral chest wall. Trying to limit donor site morbidity, we further modified the original lateral intercostal artery perforator flap, harvesting tissue on the same perforator without the skin paddle, the associated scar, and the need to reposition the patient on the operating table.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients who underwent partial breast replacement after BCS between 2015 and 2020. We compared the 27 patients with the adipofascial lateral intercostal perforator flap (ALIP) with the remaining 25 replacement flaps regarding postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increased number of postoperative seromas were detected in the ALIP group according to the Clavien-Dindo classification; however, most of them were minor and did not delay adjuvant treatments or compromise cosmetic results. The aesthetic outcome evaluated through the Web BCCT.core workstation 1 year after surgery was shown to be identical between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ALIP represents an alternative flap for tissue replacement in BCS, achieving overall similar complication rates and identical aesthetic outcomes when compared with other local perforator flaps, with reduced skin scars.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"e6811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097767/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Adipofascial Lateral Intercostal Perforator Flap in Partial Breast Reconstruction.
Background: The lateral intercostal artery perforator flap, first described by Hamdi et al as a partial replacement technique for breast-conserving surgery (BCS), was traditionally a fasciocutaneous flap with the inherent skin scar on the lateral chest wall. Trying to limit donor site morbidity, we further modified the original lateral intercostal artery perforator flap, harvesting tissue on the same perforator without the skin paddle, the associated scar, and the need to reposition the patient on the operating table.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients who underwent partial breast replacement after BCS between 2015 and 2020. We compared the 27 patients with the adipofascial lateral intercostal perforator flap (ALIP) with the remaining 25 replacement flaps regarding postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes.
Results: An increased number of postoperative seromas were detected in the ALIP group according to the Clavien-Dindo classification; however, most of them were minor and did not delay adjuvant treatments or compromise cosmetic results. The aesthetic outcome evaluated through the Web BCCT.core workstation 1 year after surgery was shown to be identical between both groups.
Conclusions: The ALIP represents an alternative flap for tissue replacement in BCS, achieving overall similar complication rates and identical aesthetic outcomes when compared with other local perforator flaps, with reduced skin scars.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.