Aleksander M Bogdanski, Derk C F Klatte, Monique E van Leerdam, Christa M Cobbaert, Bart E P B Ballieux, Jeanin E van Hooft, Kristin E Clift, Manfred Wuhrer, Wilma E Mesker, Yan Bi, Michael B Wallace, Yuri E M van der Burgt
{"title":"蛋白n -糖基化特征结合CA19-9可准确区分胰腺癌与健康对照及良性胰腺疾病","authors":"Aleksander M Bogdanski, Derk C F Klatte, Monique E van Leerdam, Christa M Cobbaert, Bart E P B Ballieux, Jeanin E van Hooft, Kristin E Clift, Manfred Wuhrer, Wilma E Mesker, Yan Bi, Michael B Wallace, Yuri E M van der Burgt","doi":"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>New methods are needed to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) earlier to improve outcomes. We previously reported that a panel of protein N-glycosylation traits (NGTs) discriminated PDAC from healthy-controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81-0.88. However, it remained unclear whether this panel accurately differentiates PDAC from other benign pancreatic disorders. Our study aims to evaluate the performance of the NGT panel in combination with CA19-9, in a diverse cohort, including PDAC cases, healthy-controls and controls with benign pancreatic disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Protein N-glycosylation profiles were determined in plasma samples using an in-house developed mass spectrometry assay. CA19-9 levels were measured using routine immunoassay test. Results of total plasma NGTs and CA19-9 were evaluated separately as well as in combination. Logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs), AUC, sensitivity and specificity to determine the performance of NGTs and CA19-9 in distinguishing PDAC from controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 221 individuals were included: 45 (20.4%) with PDAC, and 176 (79.6%) controls (53 healthy and 123 with benign pancreatic disease). The AUC for differentiating PDAC from the total control cohort based on the combination of the NGT panel and CA19-9 was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), with a sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91). Comparison of PDAC cases with healthy-controls only, resulted in an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99), with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.93) and specificity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both plasma NGTs and CA19-9 distinguish PDAC from a diverse-control cohort. The accuracy further improves when these readouts are combined, showing promise for future early detection methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":19733,"journal":{"name":"Pancreas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protein N-Glycosylation Traits Combined with CA19-9 Accurately Distinguish Pancreatic Cancer Cases From Healthy Controls and Benign Pancreatic Diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksander M Bogdanski, Derk C F Klatte, Monique E van Leerdam, Christa M Cobbaert, Bart E P B Ballieux, Jeanin E van Hooft, Kristin E Clift, Manfred Wuhrer, Wilma E Mesker, Yan Bi, Michael B Wallace, Yuri E M van der Burgt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>New methods are needed to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) earlier to improve outcomes. We previously reported that a panel of protein N-glycosylation traits (NGTs) discriminated PDAC from healthy-controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81-0.88. However, it remained unclear whether this panel accurately differentiates PDAC from other benign pancreatic disorders. Our study aims to evaluate the performance of the NGT panel in combination with CA19-9, in a diverse cohort, including PDAC cases, healthy-controls and controls with benign pancreatic disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Protein N-glycosylation profiles were determined in plasma samples using an in-house developed mass spectrometry assay. CA19-9 levels were measured using routine immunoassay test. Results of total plasma NGTs and CA19-9 were evaluated separately as well as in combination. Logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs), AUC, sensitivity and specificity to determine the performance of NGTs and CA19-9 in distinguishing PDAC from controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 221 individuals were included: 45 (20.4%) with PDAC, and 176 (79.6%) controls (53 healthy and 123 with benign pancreatic disease). The AUC for differentiating PDAC from the total control cohort based on the combination of the NGT panel and CA19-9 was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), with a sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91). Comparison of PDAC cases with healthy-controls only, resulted in an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99), with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.93) and specificity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both plasma NGTs and CA19-9 distinguish PDAC from a diverse-control cohort. The accuracy further improves when these readouts are combined, showing promise for future early detection methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pancreas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pancreas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002517\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Protein N-Glycosylation Traits Combined with CA19-9 Accurately Distinguish Pancreatic Cancer Cases From Healthy Controls and Benign Pancreatic Diseases.
Objectives: New methods are needed to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) earlier to improve outcomes. We previously reported that a panel of protein N-glycosylation traits (NGTs) discriminated PDAC from healthy-controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81-0.88. However, it remained unclear whether this panel accurately differentiates PDAC from other benign pancreatic disorders. Our study aims to evaluate the performance of the NGT panel in combination with CA19-9, in a diverse cohort, including PDAC cases, healthy-controls and controls with benign pancreatic disorders.
Methods: Protein N-glycosylation profiles were determined in plasma samples using an in-house developed mass spectrometry assay. CA19-9 levels were measured using routine immunoassay test. Results of total plasma NGTs and CA19-9 were evaluated separately as well as in combination. Logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs), AUC, sensitivity and specificity to determine the performance of NGTs and CA19-9 in distinguishing PDAC from controls.
Results: In total 221 individuals were included: 45 (20.4%) with PDAC, and 176 (79.6%) controls (53 healthy and 123 with benign pancreatic disease). The AUC for differentiating PDAC from the total control cohort based on the combination of the NGT panel and CA19-9 was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), with a sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91). Comparison of PDAC cases with healthy-controls only, resulted in an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99), with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.93) and specificity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00).
Conclusions: Both plasma NGTs and CA19-9 distinguish PDAC from a diverse-control cohort. The accuracy further improves when these readouts are combined, showing promise for future early detection methods.
期刊介绍:
Pancreas provides a central forum for communication of original works involving both basic and clinical research on the exocrine and endocrine pancreas and their interrelationships and consequences in disease states. This multidisciplinary, international journal covers the whole spectrum of basic sciences, etiology, prevention, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and surgical and medical management of pancreatic diseases, including cancer.