基质金属蛋白酶-8在牙周病诊断中的准确性:一项meta分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Oral diseases Pub Date : 2025-05-23 DOI:10.1111/odi.15389
Dong Zhang, Chao Xu, Mengmeng Liang, Wenting Shao, Peng Wang, Yahong Yang, Kangle Guo
{"title":"基质金属蛋白酶-8在牙周病诊断中的准确性:一项meta分析。","authors":"Dong Zhang, Chao Xu, Mengmeng Liang, Wenting Shao, Peng Wang, Yahong Yang, Kangle Guo","doi":"10.1111/odi.15389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) serves as a biomarker for periodontal diseases; numerous studies have demonstrated its diagnostic accuracy in detecting both periodontitis and gingivitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed up to 25 March 2025. Observational studies investigating MMP-8's diagnostic potential for periodontal disease and gingivitis were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated using Stata 15.1, with diagnostic accuracy measures reported as point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 22 diagnostic studies encompassing 2492 participants. Pooled estimates demonstrated robust diagnostic performance of MMP-8 for periodontal disease, with sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.83), and AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). Subgroup analysis revealed superior accuracy of immunofluorometric assay (IFMA), showing higher sensitivity (0.88) and specificity (0.77) compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, sensitivity/specificity = 0.84/0.76) and point-of-care testing (POCT, sensitivity/specificity = 0.73/0.64). Biological sample comparisons identified gingival crevicular fluid as the optimal source, achieving significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.91) than mouth rinse (AUC = 0.89) or saliva (AUC = 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrated that MMP-8 serves as a robust diagnostic biomarker for both periodontitis and gingivitis, with detection methods-IFMA, ELISA, and POCT-showing context-dependent applicability across clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19615,"journal":{"name":"Oral diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 for Detecting Periodontal Disease: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Zhang, Chao Xu, Mengmeng Liang, Wenting Shao, Peng Wang, Yahong Yang, Kangle Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/odi.15389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) serves as a biomarker for periodontal diseases; numerous studies have demonstrated its diagnostic accuracy in detecting both periodontitis and gingivitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed up to 25 March 2025. Observational studies investigating MMP-8's diagnostic potential for periodontal disease and gingivitis were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated using Stata 15.1, with diagnostic accuracy measures reported as point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 22 diagnostic studies encompassing 2492 participants. Pooled estimates demonstrated robust diagnostic performance of MMP-8 for periodontal disease, with sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.83), and AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). Subgroup analysis revealed superior accuracy of immunofluorometric assay (IFMA), showing higher sensitivity (0.88) and specificity (0.77) compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, sensitivity/specificity = 0.84/0.76) and point-of-care testing (POCT, sensitivity/specificity = 0.73/0.64). Biological sample comparisons identified gingival crevicular fluid as the optimal source, achieving significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.91) than mouth rinse (AUC = 0.89) or saliva (AUC = 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrated that MMP-8 serves as a robust diagnostic biomarker for both periodontitis and gingivitis, with detection methods-IFMA, ELISA, and POCT-showing context-dependent applicability across clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15389\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基质金属蛋白酶-8 (MMP-8)可作为牙周病的生物标志物;大量的研究证明了它在检测牙周炎和牙龈炎方面的诊断准确性。方法:全面检索至2025年3月25日。观察性研究调查了MMP-8对牙周病和牙龈炎的诊断潜力。使用Stata 15.1计算合并敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),诊断准确度测量报告为点估计和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:荟萃分析包括22项诊断研究,包括2492名参与者。综合估计显示,MMP-8对牙周病的诊断效果良好,敏感性为0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87),特异性为0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.83), AUC为0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90)。亚组分析显示,与酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA,敏感性/特异性= 0.84/0.76)和护理点检测(POCT,敏感性/特异性= 0.73/0.64)相比,免疫荧光法(IFMA)的准确性更高,灵敏度(0.88)和特异性(0.77)更高。生物样本比较确定龈沟液为最佳来源,其诊断准确率(AUC = 0.91)明显高于漱口水(AUC = 0.89)或唾液(AUC = 0.76)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,MMP-8是牙周炎和牙龈炎的一种强大的诊断生物标志物,其检测方法- ifma, ELISA和poct -在临床环境中显示出上下文依赖的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 for Detecting Periodontal Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) serves as a biomarker for periodontal diseases; numerous studies have demonstrated its diagnostic accuracy in detecting both periodontitis and gingivitis.

Methods: A comprehensive search was performed up to 25 March 2025. Observational studies investigating MMP-8's diagnostic potential for periodontal disease and gingivitis were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated using Stata 15.1, with diagnostic accuracy measures reported as point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: The meta-analysis included 22 diagnostic studies encompassing 2492 participants. Pooled estimates demonstrated robust diagnostic performance of MMP-8 for periodontal disease, with sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.83), and AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). Subgroup analysis revealed superior accuracy of immunofluorometric assay (IFMA), showing higher sensitivity (0.88) and specificity (0.77) compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, sensitivity/specificity = 0.84/0.76) and point-of-care testing (POCT, sensitivity/specificity = 0.73/0.64). Biological sample comparisons identified gingival crevicular fluid as the optimal source, achieving significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.91) than mouth rinse (AUC = 0.89) or saliva (AUC = 0.76).

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that MMP-8 serves as a robust diagnostic biomarker for both periodontitis and gingivitis, with detection methods-IFMA, ELISA, and POCT-showing context-dependent applicability across clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral diseases
Oral diseases 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
325
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Diseases is a multidisciplinary and international journal with a focus on head and neck disorders, edited by leaders in the field, Professor Giovanni Lodi (Editor-in-Chief, Milan, Italy), Professor Stefano Petti (Deputy Editor, Rome, Italy) and Associate Professor Gulshan Sunavala-Dossabhoy (Deputy Editor, Shreveport, LA, USA). The journal is pre-eminent in oral medicine. Oral Diseases specifically strives to link often-isolated areas of dentistry and medicine through broad-based scholarship that includes well-designed and controlled clinical research, analytical epidemiology, and the translation of basic science in pre-clinical studies. The journal typically publishes articles relevant to many related medical specialties including especially dermatology, gastroenterology, hematology, immunology, infectious diseases, neuropsychiatry, oncology and otolaryngology. The essential requirement is that all submitted research is hypothesis-driven, with significant positive and negative results both welcomed. Equal publication emphasis is placed on etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信