评估与酒后驾驶(DUI)处罚知识相关的因素。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Zoe Lindenfeld, James Macinko, Jin Yung Bae, Robert Zeithammer, Diana Silver
{"title":"评估与酒后驾驶(DUI)处罚知识相关的因素。","authors":"Zoe Lindenfeld, James Macinko, Jin Yung Bae, Robert Zeithammer, Diana Silver","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2025.2504152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> The use of legal sanctions is often framed as a way to deter driving under the influence (DUI). Yet little research has assessed frequent drinkers' knowledge of DUI penalties.<i>Objectives:</i> To assess the general public's knowledge of DUI penalties (an important element of deterrence) in their state and factors associated with more accurate knowledge.<i>Methods:</i> This US-based cross-sectional study used data from a Connect Platform survey of adult drinkers (<i>n</i> = 583, 58.0% male, 41.4% female) that asked their beliefs on the usual DUI fine and jail time penalty in their state, and how much they expected to be charged if imprisoned (jail fee). Responses were compared with data on minimum/maximum DUI penalties that appear in state statutes pertaining to DUI. For fines, responses were considered accurate if within $100 of the penalty on statute, and for jail time, if they matched the penalty on statute. Regression models were used to assess respondent characteristics associated with accurate penalty knowledge.<i>Results:</i> Among respondents, 83.7% and 67.2% underestimated the minimum DUI fine and jail time penalty in their state, respectively, and 8.7% and 19.7% overestimated. Although 75.4% of respondents lived in a state that charged jail fees, less than half were aware of this. No demographic or characteristic was consistently associated with accurate penalty knowledge across regression models (<i>p</i> > .05).<i>Conclusions:</i> The majority of respondents underestimated the DUI penalty in their state and suggest that large-scale campaigns to educate the public on the severity of DUI penalties are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing factors associated with knowledge of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) penalties.\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Lindenfeld, James Macinko, Jin Yung Bae, Robert Zeithammer, Diana Silver\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00952990.2025.2504152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> The use of legal sanctions is often framed as a way to deter driving under the influence (DUI). Yet little research has assessed frequent drinkers' knowledge of DUI penalties.<i>Objectives:</i> To assess the general public's knowledge of DUI penalties (an important element of deterrence) in their state and factors associated with more accurate knowledge.<i>Methods:</i> This US-based cross-sectional study used data from a Connect Platform survey of adult drinkers (<i>n</i> = 583, 58.0% male, 41.4% female) that asked their beliefs on the usual DUI fine and jail time penalty in their state, and how much they expected to be charged if imprisoned (jail fee). Responses were compared with data on minimum/maximum DUI penalties that appear in state statutes pertaining to DUI. For fines, responses were considered accurate if within $100 of the penalty on statute, and for jail time, if they matched the penalty on statute. Regression models were used to assess respondent characteristics associated with accurate penalty knowledge.<i>Results:</i> Among respondents, 83.7% and 67.2% underestimated the minimum DUI fine and jail time penalty in their state, respectively, and 8.7% and 19.7% overestimated. Although 75.4% of respondents lived in a state that charged jail fees, less than half were aware of this. No demographic or characteristic was consistently associated with accurate penalty knowledge across regression models (<i>p</i> > .05).<i>Conclusions:</i> The majority of respondents underestimated the DUI penalty in their state and suggest that large-scale campaigns to educate the public on the severity of DUI penalties are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2025.2504152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2025.2504152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:法律制裁的使用通常被认为是阻止酒后驾驶的一种方式。然而,很少有研究评估频繁饮酒者对酒后驾车处罚的了解程度。目的:评估公众对酒后驾驶处罚(一个重要的威慑因素)的认知,以及与更准确的认知相关的因素。方法:这项美国横断面研究使用了Connect Platform对成年饮酒者(n = 5883, 58.0%男性,41.4%女性)的调查数据,询问他们对其所在州通常的酒驾罚款和监禁处罚的看法,以及他们预计如果被监禁将被收取多少费用(监禁费)。将回答与有关DUI的州法规中出现的最低/最高DUI处罚数据进行比较。对于罚款,如果回答与法律规定的罚款相差100美元,则被认为是准确的;对于监禁时间,如果回答与法律规定的罚款相差100美元,则被认为是准确的。回归模型用于评估与准确惩罚知识相关的被调查者特征。结果:在受访者中,83.7%和67.2%的人分别低估了他们所在州的最低酒驾罚款和监禁处罚,8.7%和19.7%的人高估了。尽管75.4%的受访者居住在收取监狱费用的州,但只有不到一半的人意识到这一点。在回归模型中,没有人口统计学或特征与准确的惩罚知识一致相关(p < 0.05)。结论:大多数受访者低估了他们州的酒后驾驶处罚,并建议大规模的运动来教育公众对酒后驾驶处罚的严重性是有保证的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing factors associated with knowledge of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) penalties.

Background: The use of legal sanctions is often framed as a way to deter driving under the influence (DUI). Yet little research has assessed frequent drinkers' knowledge of DUI penalties.Objectives: To assess the general public's knowledge of DUI penalties (an important element of deterrence) in their state and factors associated with more accurate knowledge.Methods: This US-based cross-sectional study used data from a Connect Platform survey of adult drinkers (n = 583, 58.0% male, 41.4% female) that asked their beliefs on the usual DUI fine and jail time penalty in their state, and how much they expected to be charged if imprisoned (jail fee). Responses were compared with data on minimum/maximum DUI penalties that appear in state statutes pertaining to DUI. For fines, responses were considered accurate if within $100 of the penalty on statute, and for jail time, if they matched the penalty on statute. Regression models were used to assess respondent characteristics associated with accurate penalty knowledge.Results: Among respondents, 83.7% and 67.2% underestimated the minimum DUI fine and jail time penalty in their state, respectively, and 8.7% and 19.7% overestimated. Although 75.4% of respondents lived in a state that charged jail fees, less than half were aware of this. No demographic or characteristic was consistently associated with accurate penalty knowledge across regression models (p > .05).Conclusions: The majority of respondents underestimated the DUI penalty in their state and suggest that large-scale campaigns to educate the public on the severity of DUI penalties are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信