Caitlin M Hemby, Matthew C Allender, Susana Cárdenas-Alayza, Sandipty Kayastha, Leyi Wang, Julie D Sheldon
{"title":"秘鲁散养海鸟高致病性禽流感病毒快速抗原试验与定量PCR检测的比较","authors":"Caitlin M Hemby, Matthew C Allender, Susana Cárdenas-Alayza, Sandipty Kayastha, Leyi Wang, Julie D Sheldon","doi":"10.7589/JWD-D-24-00188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak in Peru devastated seabird populations and was associated with mass mortality events in marine mammals. The first mortality events were observed in coastal Peru in 2022, with the death of hundreds of Peruvian Pelicans (Pelecanus thagus). The outbreak response included health assessments and attempts to use rapid virus detection methods in the field on live and dead birds. Our study compared the FluDETECT Avian rapid antigen screening test that is commonly used in poultry with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for the detection of HPAI virus in Peruvian seabirds. In total, 43 birds across five species were evaluated in this study: Humboldt Penguins (Spheniscus humboldti; n=6), Guanay Cormorants (Leucocarbo bougainvilliorum [Phalacrocorax bougainvillii]; n=19), Peruvian Pelicans (n=13), Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus; n=2), and Peruvian Boobies (Sula variegata; n=3). We did not find agreement between the results of the rapid antigen test and the RT-qPCR (Cohen kappa=0.14). The diagnostic sensitivity of the rapid test was low (33%), whereas the specificity was 100%. Based on these findings, we do not recommend the FluDETECT Avian rapid antigen test for influenza screening in seabird species, although given the high specificity, a positive result from this rapid test should be interpreted as a true positive.</p>","PeriodicalId":17602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"756-759"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Rapid Antigen Test and Quantitative PCR for Detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus in Free-Ranging Peruvian Seabirds.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin M Hemby, Matthew C Allender, Susana Cárdenas-Alayza, Sandipty Kayastha, Leyi Wang, Julie D Sheldon\",\"doi\":\"10.7589/JWD-D-24-00188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recent highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak in Peru devastated seabird populations and was associated with mass mortality events in marine mammals. The first mortality events were observed in coastal Peru in 2022, with the death of hundreds of Peruvian Pelicans (Pelecanus thagus). The outbreak response included health assessments and attempts to use rapid virus detection methods in the field on live and dead birds. Our study compared the FluDETECT Avian rapid antigen screening test that is commonly used in poultry with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for the detection of HPAI virus in Peruvian seabirds. In total, 43 birds across five species were evaluated in this study: Humboldt Penguins (Spheniscus humboldti; n=6), Guanay Cormorants (Leucocarbo bougainvilliorum [Phalacrocorax bougainvillii]; n=19), Peruvian Pelicans (n=13), Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus; n=2), and Peruvian Boobies (Sula variegata; n=3). We did not find agreement between the results of the rapid antigen test and the RT-qPCR (Cohen kappa=0.14). The diagnostic sensitivity of the rapid test was low (33%), whereas the specificity was 100%. Based on these findings, we do not recommend the FluDETECT Avian rapid antigen test for influenza screening in seabird species, although given the high specificity, a positive result from this rapid test should be interpreted as a true positive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"756-759\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7589/JWD-D-24-00188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7589/JWD-D-24-00188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Rapid Antigen Test and Quantitative PCR for Detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus in Free-Ranging Peruvian Seabirds.
The recent highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak in Peru devastated seabird populations and was associated with mass mortality events in marine mammals. The first mortality events were observed in coastal Peru in 2022, with the death of hundreds of Peruvian Pelicans (Pelecanus thagus). The outbreak response included health assessments and attempts to use rapid virus detection methods in the field on live and dead birds. Our study compared the FluDETECT Avian rapid antigen screening test that is commonly used in poultry with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for the detection of HPAI virus in Peruvian seabirds. In total, 43 birds across five species were evaluated in this study: Humboldt Penguins (Spheniscus humboldti; n=6), Guanay Cormorants (Leucocarbo bougainvilliorum [Phalacrocorax bougainvillii]; n=19), Peruvian Pelicans (n=13), Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus; n=2), and Peruvian Boobies (Sula variegata; n=3). We did not find agreement between the results of the rapid antigen test and the RT-qPCR (Cohen kappa=0.14). The diagnostic sensitivity of the rapid test was low (33%), whereas the specificity was 100%. Based on these findings, we do not recommend the FluDETECT Avian rapid antigen test for influenza screening in seabird species, although given the high specificity, a positive result from this rapid test should be interpreted as a true positive.
期刊介绍:
The JWD publishes reports of wildlife disease investigations, research papers, brief research notes, case and epizootic reports, review articles, and book reviews. The JWD publishes the results of original research and observations dealing with all aspects of infectious, parasitic, toxic, nutritional, physiologic, developmental and neoplastic diseases, environmental contamination, and other factors impinging on the health and survival of free-living or occasionally captive populations of wild animals, including fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Papers on zoonoses involving wildlife and on chemical immobilization of wild animals are also published. Manuscripts dealing with surveys and case reports may be published in the Journal provided that they contain significant new information or have significance for better understanding health and disease in wild populations. Authors are encouraged to address the wildlife management implications of their studies, where appropriate.