Elan Small, Harrison Steins, Martin Musi, Julia Perry, Elizabeth Goldberg, Mary Ryan, Lake Crawford, Brian Strickland, Tiana Linkus, Caleb Phillips, Ryan Paterson, Nathaniel Zona, Max Smolkin, Mia Derstine, Jay Lemery, Jennifer L Hoffman, Steven R Hick, Adit A Ginde, Peter Hackett, Linda E Keyes
{"title":"马来酸丙氯哌嗪与安慰剂预防急性高山病:一项双盲随机对照试验。","authors":"Elan Small, Harrison Steins, Martin Musi, Julia Perry, Elizabeth Goldberg, Mary Ryan, Lake Crawford, Brian Strickland, Tiana Linkus, Caleb Phillips, Ryan Paterson, Nathaniel Zona, Max Smolkin, Mia Derstine, Jay Lemery, Jennifer L Hoffman, Steven R Hick, Adit A Ginde, Peter Hackett, Linda E Keyes","doi":"10.1093/jtm/taaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a debilitating condition that may occur on ascent to high altitude, with limited options for chemoprophylaxis. The pathophysiology of AMS is poorly understood, though it may be similar to migraine. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of prochlorperazine, a first-line agent for acute migraine, for AMS prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving healthy, unacclimatized adult participants, primarily from the Denver area (1609 m), who received either oral prochlorperazine or placebo three times daily for 24 hours during rapid ascent to Mount Blue Sky, Colorado (4348 m). We evaluated individuals who received at least the first dose of placebo or intervention following a modified intent-to-treat approach. Participants travelled by vehicle to 3910 m, then hiked to the summit of Mount Blue Sky, where they slept overnight. The primary outcome was AMS incidence as defined by the 2018 Lake Louise Questionnaire, which was assessed on the evening of ascent and the following morning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed 56 participants (25 women), with a mean age of 39 [IQR 28-49], with 28 participants in each study arm. Key baseline characteristics were equally distributed and well-matched between study arms. The incidence of AMS was 28 (50%), with 18 (64%) in the placebo arm and 10 (36%) in the prochlorperazine arm (P = 0.06). The absolute risk reduction was 28.6%, the number needed to treat was 4 and the odds ratio was 0.28 (95% C.I. 0.11-0.94). There were no serious adverse events, and there were no significant differences in the side effects between arms, including for drowsiness (P = 0.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that prochlorperazine is effective in preventing AMS. Larger studies are warranted to validate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of travel medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prochlorperazine maleate versus placebo for the prophylaxis of acute mountain sickness: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elan Small, Harrison Steins, Martin Musi, Julia Perry, Elizabeth Goldberg, Mary Ryan, Lake Crawford, Brian Strickland, Tiana Linkus, Caleb Phillips, Ryan Paterson, Nathaniel Zona, Max Smolkin, Mia Derstine, Jay Lemery, Jennifer L Hoffman, Steven R Hick, Adit A Ginde, Peter Hackett, Linda E Keyes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jtm/taaf044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a debilitating condition that may occur on ascent to high altitude, with limited options for chemoprophylaxis. The pathophysiology of AMS is poorly understood, though it may be similar to migraine. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of prochlorperazine, a first-line agent for acute migraine, for AMS prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving healthy, unacclimatized adult participants, primarily from the Denver area (1609 m), who received either oral prochlorperazine or placebo three times daily for 24 hours during rapid ascent to Mount Blue Sky, Colorado (4348 m). We evaluated individuals who received at least the first dose of placebo or intervention following a modified intent-to-treat approach. Participants travelled by vehicle to 3910 m, then hiked to the summit of Mount Blue Sky, where they slept overnight. The primary outcome was AMS incidence as defined by the 2018 Lake Louise Questionnaire, which was assessed on the evening of ascent and the following morning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed 56 participants (25 women), with a mean age of 39 [IQR 28-49], with 28 participants in each study arm. Key baseline characteristics were equally distributed and well-matched between study arms. The incidence of AMS was 28 (50%), with 18 (64%) in the placebo arm and 10 (36%) in the prochlorperazine arm (P = 0.06). The absolute risk reduction was 28.6%, the number needed to treat was 4 and the odds ratio was 0.28 (95% C.I. 0.11-0.94). There were no serious adverse events, and there were no significant differences in the side effects between arms, including for drowsiness (P = 0.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that prochlorperazine is effective in preventing AMS. Larger studies are warranted to validate our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of travel medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of travel medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaf044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of travel medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaf044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:急性高山病(AMS)是一种可能发生在高海拔地区的衰弱性疾病,具有有限的化学预防选择。AMS的病理生理机制虽然可能与偏头痛相似,但人们对其了解甚少。本研究旨在确定丙氯拉嗪(一种治疗急性偏头痛的一线药物)预防AMS的疗效。方法:我们进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,参与者主要来自丹佛地区(海拔1609米),在快速攀登科罗拉多州蓝天山(海拔4348米)期间,每天三次口服丙氯哌嗪或安慰剂,持续24小时。我们评估了至少接受第一剂量安慰剂或根据修改后的意向治疗方法进行干预的个体。参与者乘车到达海拔3910米的地方,然后徒步到蓝天山山顶,在那里过夜。主要指标为2018年路易斯湖调查问卷(Lake Louise Questionnaire)所定义的AMS发病率,分别在登山当晚和次日上午进行评估。结果:我们分析了56名参与者(25名女性),平均年龄为39岁[IQR 28-49],每个研究组有28名参与者。关键基线特征在研究组之间分布均匀且匹配良好。AMS的发生率为28例(50%),其中安慰剂组18例(64%),丙氯哌嗪组10例(36%)(p = 0.06)。绝对风险降低28.6%,需要治疗的人数为4人,优势比为0.28 (95% ci 0.11-0.94)。无严重不良事件发生,两组间包括嗜睡在内的副作用无显著差异(p = 0.47)。结论:本研究提示丙氯哌嗪对AMS有较好的预防作用。有必要进行更大规模的研究来验证我们的发现。
Prochlorperazine maleate versus placebo for the prophylaxis of acute mountain sickness: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Background: Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a debilitating condition that may occur on ascent to high altitude, with limited options for chemoprophylaxis. The pathophysiology of AMS is poorly understood, though it may be similar to migraine. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of prochlorperazine, a first-line agent for acute migraine, for AMS prophylaxis.
Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving healthy, unacclimatized adult participants, primarily from the Denver area (1609 m), who received either oral prochlorperazine or placebo three times daily for 24 hours during rapid ascent to Mount Blue Sky, Colorado (4348 m). We evaluated individuals who received at least the first dose of placebo or intervention following a modified intent-to-treat approach. Participants travelled by vehicle to 3910 m, then hiked to the summit of Mount Blue Sky, where they slept overnight. The primary outcome was AMS incidence as defined by the 2018 Lake Louise Questionnaire, which was assessed on the evening of ascent and the following morning.
Results: We analysed 56 participants (25 women), with a mean age of 39 [IQR 28-49], with 28 participants in each study arm. Key baseline characteristics were equally distributed and well-matched between study arms. The incidence of AMS was 28 (50%), with 18 (64%) in the placebo arm and 10 (36%) in the prochlorperazine arm (P = 0.06). The absolute risk reduction was 28.6%, the number needed to treat was 4 and the odds ratio was 0.28 (95% C.I. 0.11-0.94). There were no serious adverse events, and there were no significant differences in the side effects between arms, including for drowsiness (P = 0.47).
Conclusion: Our results suggest that prochlorperazine is effective in preventing AMS. Larger studies are warranted to validate our findings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Travel Medicine is a publication that focuses on travel medicine and its intersection with other disciplines. It publishes cutting-edge research, consensus papers, policy papers, and expert reviews. The journal is affiliated with the Asia Pacific Travel Health Society.
The journal's main areas of interest include the prevention and management of travel-associated infections, non-communicable diseases, vaccines, malaria prevention and treatment, multi-drug resistant pathogens, and surveillance on all individuals crossing international borders.
The Journal of Travel Medicine is indexed in multiple major indexing services, including Adis International Ltd., CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, Gale, Journal Watch Infectious Diseases (Online), MetaPress, National Library of Medicine, OCLC, Ovid, ProQuest, Thomson Reuters, and the U.S. National Library of Medicine.