Vahid Danesh, Paul Arauz, Maede Boroji, Andrew Zhu, Mia Cottone, Elaine Gould, Fazel A Khan, Imin Kao
{"title":"使用实时视觉引导手术系统提高盆腔肿瘤切除的准确性。","authors":"Vahid Danesh, Paul Arauz, Maede Boroji, Andrew Zhu, Mia Cottone, Elaine Gould, Fazel A Khan, Imin Kao","doi":"10.1002/jor.26111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pelvic bone tumor resections remain significantly challenging due to complex three-dimensional anatomy and limited surgical visualization. While accurate, current navigation systems and patient-specific instruments present limitations, including high costs, radiation exposure, workflow disruption, long production time, and lack of reusability. This study evaluates a real-time vision-guided surgical system combined with modular jigs to improve accuracy in pelvic bone tumor resections. A vision-guided surgical system combined with modular cutting jigs and real-time optical tracking was developed and validated. Five male pelvis sawbones were used, with each hemipelvis randomly assigned to either the vision-guided and modular jig system or the traditional freehand method. A total of 20 resection planes were analyzed for each method. Accuracy was assessed by measuring distance and angular deviations from the planned resection planes. The vision-guided and modular jig system significantly improved resection accuracy compared to the freehand method, reducing the mean distance deviation from 2.07 ± 1.71 mm to 1.01 ± 0.78 mm (p = 0.0193). In particular, all specimens resected using the vision-guided system exhibited errors of less than 3 mm. Angular deviations also showed significant improvements with roll angle deviation reduced from 15.36 ± 17.57° to 4.21 ± 3.46° (p = 0.0275), and pitch angle deviation decreased from 6.17 ± 4.58° to 1.84 ± 1.48° (p < 0.001). The proposed vision-guided and modular jig system significantly improves the accuracy of pelvic bone tumor resections while maintaining workflow efficiency. This cost-effective solution provides real-time guidance without the need for referencing external monitors, potentially improving surgical outcomes in complex pelvic bone tumor cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Accuracy in Pelvic Tumor Resections Using a Real-Time Vision-Guided Surgical System.\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Danesh, Paul Arauz, Maede Boroji, Andrew Zhu, Mia Cottone, Elaine Gould, Fazel A Khan, Imin Kao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jor.26111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pelvic bone tumor resections remain significantly challenging due to complex three-dimensional anatomy and limited surgical visualization. While accurate, current navigation systems and patient-specific instruments present limitations, including high costs, radiation exposure, workflow disruption, long production time, and lack of reusability. This study evaluates a real-time vision-guided surgical system combined with modular jigs to improve accuracy in pelvic bone tumor resections. A vision-guided surgical system combined with modular cutting jigs and real-time optical tracking was developed and validated. Five male pelvis sawbones were used, with each hemipelvis randomly assigned to either the vision-guided and modular jig system or the traditional freehand method. A total of 20 resection planes were analyzed for each method. Accuracy was assessed by measuring distance and angular deviations from the planned resection planes. The vision-guided and modular jig system significantly improved resection accuracy compared to the freehand method, reducing the mean distance deviation from 2.07 ± 1.71 mm to 1.01 ± 0.78 mm (p = 0.0193). In particular, all specimens resected using the vision-guided system exhibited errors of less than 3 mm. Angular deviations also showed significant improvements with roll angle deviation reduced from 15.36 ± 17.57° to 4.21 ± 3.46° (p = 0.0275), and pitch angle deviation decreased from 6.17 ± 4.58° to 1.84 ± 1.48° (p < 0.001). The proposed vision-guided and modular jig system significantly improves the accuracy of pelvic bone tumor resections while maintaining workflow efficiency. This cost-effective solution provides real-time guidance without the need for referencing external monitors, potentially improving surgical outcomes in complex pelvic bone tumor cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于复杂的三维解剖结构和有限的手术可视化,骨盆骨肿瘤切除仍然具有很大的挑战性。虽然准确,但目前的导航系统和患者专用仪器存在局限性,包括成本高、辐射暴露、工作流程中断、生产时间长以及缺乏可重用性。本研究评估了实时视觉引导手术系统与模块化夹具相结合,以提高骨盆骨肿瘤切除术的准确性。开发并验证了一种结合模块化切割夹具和实时光学跟踪的视觉引导手术系统。使用5个男性骨盆锯骨,每个半骨盆随机分配到视觉引导和模块化夹具系统或传统的徒手方法。每种方法共分析了20个切除平面。通过测量距离和角度偏离计划的切除平面来评估精度。与徒手方法相比,视觉引导和模块化夹具系统显著提高了切除精度,将平均距离偏差从2.07±1.71 mm减少到1.01±0.78 mm (p = 0.0193)。特别是,所有使用视觉引导系统切除的标本显示误差小于3毫米。侧滚角偏差从15.36±17.57°降低到4.21±3.46°(p = 0.0275),俯仰角偏差从6.17±4.58°降低到1.84±1.48°(p = 0.0275)
Improved Accuracy in Pelvic Tumor Resections Using a Real-Time Vision-Guided Surgical System.
Pelvic bone tumor resections remain significantly challenging due to complex three-dimensional anatomy and limited surgical visualization. While accurate, current navigation systems and patient-specific instruments present limitations, including high costs, radiation exposure, workflow disruption, long production time, and lack of reusability. This study evaluates a real-time vision-guided surgical system combined with modular jigs to improve accuracy in pelvic bone tumor resections. A vision-guided surgical system combined with modular cutting jigs and real-time optical tracking was developed and validated. Five male pelvis sawbones were used, with each hemipelvis randomly assigned to either the vision-guided and modular jig system or the traditional freehand method. A total of 20 resection planes were analyzed for each method. Accuracy was assessed by measuring distance and angular deviations from the planned resection planes. The vision-guided and modular jig system significantly improved resection accuracy compared to the freehand method, reducing the mean distance deviation from 2.07 ± 1.71 mm to 1.01 ± 0.78 mm (p = 0.0193). In particular, all specimens resected using the vision-guided system exhibited errors of less than 3 mm. Angular deviations also showed significant improvements with roll angle deviation reduced from 15.36 ± 17.57° to 4.21 ± 3.46° (p = 0.0275), and pitch angle deviation decreased from 6.17 ± 4.58° to 1.84 ± 1.48° (p < 0.001). The proposed vision-guided and modular jig system significantly improves the accuracy of pelvic bone tumor resections while maintaining workflow efficiency. This cost-effective solution provides real-time guidance without the need for referencing external monitors, potentially improving surgical outcomes in complex pelvic bone tumor cases.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.