Mihaela Roxana Oliță, Mihai Adrian Eftimie, Andrei Andreșanu, Mihai Adrian Dobra, Elena Liliana Mirea, Dana Rodica Tomescu
{"title":"结直肠腹腔镜区域麻醉:腰方肌阻滞与TAP阻滞的回顾性比较。","authors":"Mihaela Roxana Oliță, Mihai Adrian Eftimie, Andrei Andreșanu, Mihai Adrian Dobra, Elena Liliana Mirea, Dana Rodica Tomescu","doi":"10.25122/jml-2025-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective postoperative pain control is pivotal in enhancing recovery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques such as the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the quadratus lumborum (QL) block have gained prominence as components of multimodal analgesia. However, their comparative efficacy remains underexplored. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 289 patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery. Patients were stratified into three groups: TAP block (Group A, <i>n</i> = 54), QL block (Group B, <i>n</i> = 62), and no regional block (Group C, <i>n</i> = 173). Primary endpoints included time to first analgesic administration and total analgesic consumption (opioids and non-opioids). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (v4.4.2) and Jamovi (v2.3), with significance set at <i>P</i> < 0.05. Group B (QL block) demonstrated significantly reduced opioid consumption (mean 13.16 ± 2.69 mg) compared to both Group A (16.80 ± 5.51 mg) and Group C (18.03 ± 4.29 mg), <i>P</i> < 0.001. Time to first analgesic request was longer in Group B (16.06 ± 2.53 h), indicating more durable analgesia. Non-opioid usage (paracetamol, tramadol, nefopam) was similarly lower in Group B across all comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Group B also exhibited a significantly shorter hospital stay (4.87 ± 1.14 days) relative to Groups A and C. The QL block was associated with superior postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid and adjunct analgesic requirements, prolonged pain-free intervals, and accelerated postoperative recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. These findings underscore QL block as a potent element of opioid-sparing, multimodal analgesic strategies and support its broader adoption in enhanced recovery protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"18 4","pages":"285-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional anesthesia in colorectal laparoscopy: a retrospective comparison of quadratus lumborum and TAP blocks.\",\"authors\":\"Mihaela Roxana Oliță, Mihai Adrian Eftimie, Andrei Andreșanu, Mihai Adrian Dobra, Elena Liliana Mirea, Dana Rodica Tomescu\",\"doi\":\"10.25122/jml-2025-0067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective postoperative pain control is pivotal in enhancing recovery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques such as the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the quadratus lumborum (QL) block have gained prominence as components of multimodal analgesia. However, their comparative efficacy remains underexplored. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 289 patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery. Patients were stratified into three groups: TAP block (Group A, <i>n</i> = 54), QL block (Group B, <i>n</i> = 62), and no regional block (Group C, <i>n</i> = 173). Primary endpoints included time to first analgesic administration and total analgesic consumption (opioids and non-opioids). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (v4.4.2) and Jamovi (v2.3), with significance set at <i>P</i> < 0.05. Group B (QL block) demonstrated significantly reduced opioid consumption (mean 13.16 ± 2.69 mg) compared to both Group A (16.80 ± 5.51 mg) and Group C (18.03 ± 4.29 mg), <i>P</i> < 0.001. Time to first analgesic request was longer in Group B (16.06 ± 2.53 h), indicating more durable analgesia. Non-opioid usage (paracetamol, tramadol, nefopam) was similarly lower in Group B across all comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Group B also exhibited a significantly shorter hospital stay (4.87 ± 1.14 days) relative to Groups A and C. The QL block was associated with superior postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid and adjunct analgesic requirements, prolonged pain-free intervals, and accelerated postoperative recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. These findings underscore QL block as a potent element of opioid-sparing, multimodal analgesic strategies and support its broader adoption in enhanced recovery protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"285-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094314/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regional anesthesia in colorectal laparoscopy: a retrospective comparison of quadratus lumborum and TAP blocks.
Effective postoperative pain control is pivotal in enhancing recovery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques such as the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the quadratus lumborum (QL) block have gained prominence as components of multimodal analgesia. However, their comparative efficacy remains underexplored. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 289 patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery. Patients were stratified into three groups: TAP block (Group A, n = 54), QL block (Group B, n = 62), and no regional block (Group C, n = 173). Primary endpoints included time to first analgesic administration and total analgesic consumption (opioids and non-opioids). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (v4.4.2) and Jamovi (v2.3), with significance set at P < 0.05. Group B (QL block) demonstrated significantly reduced opioid consumption (mean 13.16 ± 2.69 mg) compared to both Group A (16.80 ± 5.51 mg) and Group C (18.03 ± 4.29 mg), P < 0.001. Time to first analgesic request was longer in Group B (16.06 ± 2.53 h), indicating more durable analgesia. Non-opioid usage (paracetamol, tramadol, nefopam) was similarly lower in Group B across all comparisons (P < 0.001). Group B also exhibited a significantly shorter hospital stay (4.87 ± 1.14 days) relative to Groups A and C. The QL block was associated with superior postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid and adjunct analgesic requirements, prolonged pain-free intervals, and accelerated postoperative recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. These findings underscore QL block as a potent element of opioid-sparing, multimodal analgesic strategies and support its broader adoption in enhanced recovery protocols.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.