结直肠腹腔镜区域麻醉:腰方肌阻滞与TAP阻滞的回顾性比较。

Q3 Medicine
Mihaela Roxana Oliță, Mihai Adrian Eftimie, Andrei Andreșanu, Mihai Adrian Dobra, Elena Liliana Mirea, Dana Rodica Tomescu
{"title":"结直肠腹腔镜区域麻醉:腰方肌阻滞与TAP阻滞的回顾性比较。","authors":"Mihaela Roxana Oliță, Mihai Adrian Eftimie, Andrei Andreșanu, Mihai Adrian Dobra, Elena Liliana Mirea, Dana Rodica Tomescu","doi":"10.25122/jml-2025-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective postoperative pain control is pivotal in enhancing recovery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques such as the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the quadratus lumborum (QL) block have gained prominence as components of multimodal analgesia. However, their comparative efficacy remains underexplored. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 289 patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery. Patients were stratified into three groups: TAP block (Group A, <i>n</i> = 54), QL block (Group B, <i>n</i> = 62), and no regional block (Group C, <i>n</i> = 173). Primary endpoints included time to first analgesic administration and total analgesic consumption (opioids and non-opioids). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (v4.4.2) and Jamovi (v2.3), with significance set at <i>P</i> < 0.05. Group B (QL block) demonstrated significantly reduced opioid consumption (mean 13.16 ± 2.69 mg) compared to both Group A (16.80 ± 5.51 mg) and Group C (18.03 ± 4.29 mg), <i>P</i> < 0.001. Time to first analgesic request was longer in Group B (16.06 ± 2.53 h), indicating more durable analgesia. Non-opioid usage (paracetamol, tramadol, nefopam) was similarly lower in Group B across all comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Group B also exhibited a significantly shorter hospital stay (4.87 ± 1.14 days) relative to Groups A and C. The QL block was associated with superior postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid and adjunct analgesic requirements, prolonged pain-free intervals, and accelerated postoperative recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. These findings underscore QL block as a potent element of opioid-sparing, multimodal analgesic strategies and support its broader adoption in enhanced recovery protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"18 4","pages":"285-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional anesthesia in colorectal laparoscopy: a retrospective comparison of quadratus lumborum and TAP blocks.\",\"authors\":\"Mihaela Roxana Oliță, Mihai Adrian Eftimie, Andrei Andreșanu, Mihai Adrian Dobra, Elena Liliana Mirea, Dana Rodica Tomescu\",\"doi\":\"10.25122/jml-2025-0067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective postoperative pain control is pivotal in enhancing recovery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques such as the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the quadratus lumborum (QL) block have gained prominence as components of multimodal analgesia. However, their comparative efficacy remains underexplored. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 289 patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery. Patients were stratified into three groups: TAP block (Group A, <i>n</i> = 54), QL block (Group B, <i>n</i> = 62), and no regional block (Group C, <i>n</i> = 173). Primary endpoints included time to first analgesic administration and total analgesic consumption (opioids and non-opioids). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (v4.4.2) and Jamovi (v2.3), with significance set at <i>P</i> < 0.05. Group B (QL block) demonstrated significantly reduced opioid consumption (mean 13.16 ± 2.69 mg) compared to both Group A (16.80 ± 5.51 mg) and Group C (18.03 ± 4.29 mg), <i>P</i> < 0.001. Time to first analgesic request was longer in Group B (16.06 ± 2.53 h), indicating more durable analgesia. Non-opioid usage (paracetamol, tramadol, nefopam) was similarly lower in Group B across all comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Group B also exhibited a significantly shorter hospital stay (4.87 ± 1.14 days) relative to Groups A and C. The QL block was associated with superior postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid and adjunct analgesic requirements, prolonged pain-free intervals, and accelerated postoperative recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. These findings underscore QL block as a potent element of opioid-sparing, multimodal analgesic strategies and support its broader adoption in enhanced recovery protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"285-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094314/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的术后疼痛控制是提高腹腔镜结直肠手术后恢复的关键。区域麻醉技术,如腹横面阻滞(TAP)和腰方肌阻滞(QL)作为多模式镇痛的组成部分,已经得到了突出的地位。然而,它们的相对疗效仍未得到充分探讨。这项回顾性观察队列研究分析了289例腹腔镜结肠手术患者的数据。将患者分为三组:TAP组(A组,n = 54)、QL组(B组,n = 62)和无区域组(C组,n = 173)。主要终点包括首次给药时间和总镇痛消耗(阿片类药物和非阿片类药物)。采用R (v4.4.2)和Jamovi (v2.3)进行统计学分析,P < 0.05为显著性。与A组(16.80±5.51 mg)和C组(18.03±4.29 mg)相比,B组(QL阻滞)的阿片类药物消耗显著减少(平均13.16±2.69 mg), P < 0.001。B组第一次要求镇痛时间较长(16.06±2.53 h),说明镇痛更持久。在所有比较中,B组的非阿片类药物(扑热息痛、曲马多、nefopam)的使用同样较低(P < 0.001)。与a组和c组相比,B组的住院时间也明显缩短(4.87±1.14天)。QL阻滞与腹腔镜结直肠手术中更好的术后镇痛、减少阿片类药物和辅助镇痛需求、延长无痛间隔和加速术后恢复有关。这些发现强调了QL阻滞作为阿片类药物节约、多模式镇痛策略的有效元素,并支持其在增强恢复方案中的广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional anesthesia in colorectal laparoscopy: a retrospective comparison of quadratus lumborum and TAP blocks.

Effective postoperative pain control is pivotal in enhancing recovery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques such as the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the quadratus lumborum (QL) block have gained prominence as components of multimodal analgesia. However, their comparative efficacy remains underexplored. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 289 patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery. Patients were stratified into three groups: TAP block (Group A, n = 54), QL block (Group B, n = 62), and no regional block (Group C, n = 173). Primary endpoints included time to first analgesic administration and total analgesic consumption (opioids and non-opioids). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (v4.4.2) and Jamovi (v2.3), with significance set at P < 0.05. Group B (QL block) demonstrated significantly reduced opioid consumption (mean 13.16 ± 2.69 mg) compared to both Group A (16.80 ± 5.51 mg) and Group C (18.03 ± 4.29 mg), P < 0.001. Time to first analgesic request was longer in Group B (16.06 ± 2.53 h), indicating more durable analgesia. Non-opioid usage (paracetamol, tramadol, nefopam) was similarly lower in Group B across all comparisons (P < 0.001). Group B also exhibited a significantly shorter hospital stay (4.87 ± 1.14 days) relative to Groups A and C. The QL block was associated with superior postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid and adjunct analgesic requirements, prolonged pain-free intervals, and accelerated postoperative recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. These findings underscore QL block as a potent element of opioid-sparing, multimodal analgesic strategies and support its broader adoption in enhanced recovery protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信