Emily C Morris, Katherine L Tucker, Richard J McManus, Richard J Stevens
{"title":"经验的重要性:TASMINH4试验对最佳家庭血压监测方案的见解。","authors":"Emily C Morris, Katherine L Tucker, Richard J McManus, Richard J Stevens","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates how prior home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) experience affects blood pressure variability and evaluates if reduced HBPM regimens could be recommended for experienced patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This posthoc analysis of the TASMINH4 trial included self-monitored blood pressure (BP) data from 225 patients. The standard deviation of systolic BP recordings was calculated for each patient-week to assess how BP variability changes with HBPM duration. A subgroup of 84 patients, who submitted at least 1 reading a day for 7 days at months 1, 3, and 6, was analysed to assess the impact of reduced HBPM regimens on BP estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Day 1 readings were significantly higher than day 2-7 in the first 3 months of HBPM: 1.1 (95% CI 1.8, 0.4) day 1 vs. day 2. This effect diminished after 6 months: 1.0 (95% CI -0.8, 2.8) day 1 vs. 2. Long term monitoring significantly reduced intra-week BP variability, with the standard deviation of systolic BP recordings within each patient-week significantly reduced after 6 months. After 6 months of HBPM, the inclusion of day 1 readings or use of an abbreviated monitoring regimen had a reduced impact on estimates of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term HBPM reduces intra-week BP variability, making day 1 readings insignificantly raised after 6 months of HBPM. This provides rationale for different HBPM recommendations: longer regimes, excluding day one readings, for diagnosis and short-term monitoring; and abbreviated regimes including day 1 for longer term monitoring in those with HBPM experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The importance of experience: insights into optimal home-blood pressure monitoring regimens from the TASMINH4 Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Emily C Morris, Katherine L Tucker, Richard J McManus, Richard J Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates how prior home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) experience affects blood pressure variability and evaluates if reduced HBPM regimens could be recommended for experienced patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This posthoc analysis of the TASMINH4 trial included self-monitored blood pressure (BP) data from 225 patients. The standard deviation of systolic BP recordings was calculated for each patient-week to assess how BP variability changes with HBPM duration. A subgroup of 84 patients, who submitted at least 1 reading a day for 7 days at months 1, 3, and 6, was analysed to assess the impact of reduced HBPM regimens on BP estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Day 1 readings were significantly higher than day 2-7 in the first 3 months of HBPM: 1.1 (95% CI 1.8, 0.4) day 1 vs. day 2. This effect diminished after 6 months: 1.0 (95% CI -0.8, 2.8) day 1 vs. 2. Long term monitoring significantly reduced intra-week BP variability, with the standard deviation of systolic BP recordings within each patient-week significantly reduced after 6 months. After 6 months of HBPM, the inclusion of day 1 readings or use of an abbreviated monitoring regimen had a reduced impact on estimates of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term HBPM reduces intra-week BP variability, making day 1 readings insignificantly raised after 6 months of HBPM. This provides rationale for different HBPM recommendations: longer regimes, excluding day one readings, for diagnosis and short-term monitoring; and abbreviated regimes including day 1 for longer term monitoring in those with HBPM experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004062\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究调查既往家庭血压监测(HBPM)经历如何影响血压变异性,并评估是否可以向有经验的患者推荐减少HBPM方案。方法:这项TASMINH4试验的事后分析包括225例患者的自我监测血压(BP)数据。计算每个患者周收缩压记录的标准差,以评估血压变异性随HBPM持续时间的变化情况。在第1、3和6个月,84名患者每天至少进行1次阅读,持续7天,我们分析了降低HBPM方案对血压估计的影响。结果:在HBPM治疗的前3个月,第1天的读数显著高于第2-7天:第1天的读数为1.1 (95% CI 1.8, 0.4),第2天的读数为1.1。6个月后,这种效应减弱:第1天1.0天(95% CI -0.8, 2.8) vs.第2天。长期监测显著降低周内血压变异性,6个月后每个患者周内收缩压记录的标准差显著降低。HBPM 6个月后,纳入第1天读数或使用简化监测方案对平均收缩压和舒张压估计值的影响降低。结论:长期HBPM降低周内血压变异性,使HBPM 6个月后第1天的读数无显著升高。这为不同的HBPM建议提供了依据:较长的治疗方案(不包括第一天的读数)用于诊断和短期监测;对那些有HBPM经验的患者进行短期监测,包括第一天的长期监测。
The importance of experience: insights into optimal home-blood pressure monitoring regimens from the TASMINH4 Trial.
Objectives: This study investigates how prior home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) experience affects blood pressure variability and evaluates if reduced HBPM regimens could be recommended for experienced patients.
Methods: This posthoc analysis of the TASMINH4 trial included self-monitored blood pressure (BP) data from 225 patients. The standard deviation of systolic BP recordings was calculated for each patient-week to assess how BP variability changes with HBPM duration. A subgroup of 84 patients, who submitted at least 1 reading a day for 7 days at months 1, 3, and 6, was analysed to assess the impact of reduced HBPM regimens on BP estimates.
Results: Day 1 readings were significantly higher than day 2-7 in the first 3 months of HBPM: 1.1 (95% CI 1.8, 0.4) day 1 vs. day 2. This effect diminished after 6 months: 1.0 (95% CI -0.8, 2.8) day 1 vs. 2. Long term monitoring significantly reduced intra-week BP variability, with the standard deviation of systolic BP recordings within each patient-week significantly reduced after 6 months. After 6 months of HBPM, the inclusion of day 1 readings or use of an abbreviated monitoring regimen had a reduced impact on estimates of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Conclusions: Long-term HBPM reduces intra-week BP variability, making day 1 readings insignificantly raised after 6 months of HBPM. This provides rationale for different HBPM recommendations: longer regimes, excluding day one readings, for diagnosis and short-term monitoring; and abbreviated regimes including day 1 for longer term monitoring in those with HBPM experience.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.