重症监护病房社区获得性肺炎患者住院死亡率预测模型的开发和验证

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-23 DOI:10.1177/03000605251340304
Xuefeng Song, Qiang Zhang, Zhijiang Qi, Bo Liu
{"title":"重症监护病房社区获得性肺炎患者住院死亡率预测模型的开发和验证","authors":"Xuefeng Song, Qiang Zhang, Zhijiang Qi, Bo Liu","doi":"10.1177/03000605251340304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis retrospective cohort study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit.MethodsData of patients meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database, and the patients were randomly allocated into training (n = 3798, 70%) and validation (n = 1629, 30%) cohorts. First-day intensive care unit admission parameters were averaged. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify mortality risk factors in the training cohort, followed by nomogram construction. Model performance was evaluated based on discrimination (area under the curve), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test and bootstrap resampling), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). Data from emergency intensive care unit were used to perform external validation of the value of the model.ResultsIn total, 5427 patients were included. Age, red cell distribution width, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology Score-III, blood urea nitrogen-to-serum creatinine ratio, anion gap, osmolarity, and sepsis were identified as independent risk factors for hospital mortality. The nomogram demonstrated superior discrimination compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Acute Physiology Score-III in the validation (area under the curve: 0.772 vs. 0.685-0.724) and training (area under the curve: 0.787 vs. 0.708-0.740; <i>p </i><<i> </i>0.05) sets. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed robust performance (Hosmer-Lemeshow <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.11; net benefit threshold: 20%-80%). In both cohorts, calibration and decision curve analyses showed that the nomogram had good calibration degree, discriminative ability, and clinical benefits. Data from emergency intensive care unit showed that the area under the curve of the model was 0.7864 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.81), area under the curve of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was 0.7217 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.75), and area under the curve of Acute Physiology Score-III was 0.7055 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73).ConclusionsThis nomogram provides moderate predictive accuracy for hospital mortality in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia and may aid prognosis assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 5","pages":"3000605251340304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a predictive model for hospital mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit.\",\"authors\":\"Xuefeng Song, Qiang Zhang, Zhijiang Qi, Bo Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03000605251340304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThis retrospective cohort study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit.MethodsData of patients meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database, and the patients were randomly allocated into training (n = 3798, 70%) and validation (n = 1629, 30%) cohorts. First-day intensive care unit admission parameters were averaged. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify mortality risk factors in the training cohort, followed by nomogram construction. Model performance was evaluated based on discrimination (area under the curve), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test and bootstrap resampling), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). Data from emergency intensive care unit were used to perform external validation of the value of the model.ResultsIn total, 5427 patients were included. Age, red cell distribution width, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology Score-III, blood urea nitrogen-to-serum creatinine ratio, anion gap, osmolarity, and sepsis were identified as independent risk factors for hospital mortality. The nomogram demonstrated superior discrimination compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Acute Physiology Score-III in the validation (area under the curve: 0.772 vs. 0.685-0.724) and training (area under the curve: 0.787 vs. 0.708-0.740; <i>p </i><<i> </i>0.05) sets. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed robust performance (Hosmer-Lemeshow <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.11; net benefit threshold: 20%-80%). In both cohorts, calibration and decision curve analyses showed that the nomogram had good calibration degree, discriminative ability, and clinical benefits. Data from emergency intensive care unit showed that the area under the curve of the model was 0.7864 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.81), area under the curve of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was 0.7217 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.75), and area under the curve of Acute Physiology Score-III was 0.7055 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73).ConclusionsThis nomogram provides moderate predictive accuracy for hospital mortality in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia and may aid prognosis assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"3000605251340304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102541/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251340304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251340304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性队列研究旨在建立并验证一种预测社区获得性肺炎住院重症监护患者住院死亡率的nomogram。方法从重症监护医学信息集市- iv数据库中提取符合纳入标准的患者数据,将患者随机分为训练组(n = 3798, 70%)和验证组(n = 1629, 30%)。第一天重症监护病房入院参数取平均值。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归和多变量logistic回归分析来确定培训队列中的死亡危险因素,然后进行nomogram构建。模型性能评估基于区分(曲线下面积)、校准(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验和bootstrap重采样)和临床效用(决策曲线分析)。利用重症监护室的数据对模型的价值进行外部验证。结果共纳入5427例患者。年龄、红细胞分布宽度、序次器官衰竭评估、急性生理评分- iii、尿素氮与血清肌酐比、阴离子间隙、渗透压和脓毒症被确定为医院死亡的独立危险因素。与序贯器官衰竭评估和急性生理评分- iii相比,nomogram在验证(曲线下面积:0.772 vs. 0.685-0.724)和训练(曲线下面积:0.787 vs. 0.708-0.740;P 0.05)组。校准和决策曲线分析证实了稳健的性能(Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.11;净效益阈值:20%-80%)。在这两个队列中,校正曲线和决策曲线分析表明,nomogram具有良好的校正度、判别能力和临床效益。急诊重症监护病房数据显示,模型曲线下面积为0.7864(95%可信区间为0.76 ~ 0.81),序事性脏器衰竭评估曲线下面积为0.7217(95%可信区间为0.69 ~ 0.75),急性生理评分-ⅲ曲线下面积为0.7055(95%可信区间为0.68 ~ 0.73)。结论该nomogram对社区获得性肺炎危重患者的住院死亡率具有中等的预测准确性,并可能有助于预后评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a predictive model for hospital mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit.

ObjectiveThis retrospective cohort study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit.MethodsData of patients meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database, and the patients were randomly allocated into training (n = 3798, 70%) and validation (n = 1629, 30%) cohorts. First-day intensive care unit admission parameters were averaged. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify mortality risk factors in the training cohort, followed by nomogram construction. Model performance was evaluated based on discrimination (area under the curve), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test and bootstrap resampling), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). Data from emergency intensive care unit were used to perform external validation of the value of the model.ResultsIn total, 5427 patients were included. Age, red cell distribution width, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology Score-III, blood urea nitrogen-to-serum creatinine ratio, anion gap, osmolarity, and sepsis were identified as independent risk factors for hospital mortality. The nomogram demonstrated superior discrimination compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Acute Physiology Score-III in the validation (area under the curve: 0.772 vs. 0.685-0.724) and training (area under the curve: 0.787 vs. 0.708-0.740; p <0.05) sets. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed robust performance (Hosmer-Lemeshow p =0.11; net benefit threshold: 20%-80%). In both cohorts, calibration and decision curve analyses showed that the nomogram had good calibration degree, discriminative ability, and clinical benefits. Data from emergency intensive care unit showed that the area under the curve of the model was 0.7864 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.81), area under the curve of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was 0.7217 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.75), and area under the curve of Acute Physiology Score-III was 0.7055 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73).ConclusionsThis nomogram provides moderate predictive accuracy for hospital mortality in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia and may aid prognosis assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信