对吉尔吉斯斯坦和塔吉克斯坦持续质量改进项目进行系统的、基于标准的参与性评估:孕产妇保健成果。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tinatin Gagua, Dimitry Beglitse, Anna Calancae, Dilrabo Yunusova, Arsen Askerov, Zarina Ibragimova, Asel Orozalieva, Nurshaim Tilenbaeva, Shoira Yusupova, Oleg Kuzmenko, Sophie Jullien, Martin W Weber
{"title":"对吉尔吉斯斯坦和塔吉克斯坦持续质量改进项目进行系统的、基于标准的参与性评估:孕产妇保健成果。","authors":"Tinatin Gagua, Dimitry Beglitse, Anna Calancae, Dilrabo Yunusova, Arsen Askerov, Zarina Ibragimova, Asel Orozalieva, Nurshaim Tilenbaeva, Shoira Yusupova, Oleg Kuzmenko, Sophie Jullien, Martin W Weber","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal health care quality remains challenging in low- and middle-income countries, including Central Asia, where access to effective care is limited. While quality improvement (QI) interventions have been introduced, their impact is rarely evaluated. This study evaluates the effects of a two-year, complex QI intervention to improve maternal health services in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a pre-post intervention design to evaluate improvements in maternal health care quality in 19 hospitals across Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Following an initial assessment, an action plan was developed using a WHO-standardised tool. The study implemented a multi-faceted intervention to improve maternal health. A 0-3 scoring system measured changes over time. No control group was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Kyrgyzstan, significant improvements were observed in caesarean section management (mean (x̄) = 1.9-2.1, P = 0.01), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.01), postpartum haemorrhage management (x̄ = 1.8-2.1, P = 0.03), and preeclampsia management (x̄ = 1.4-1.9, P = 0.01). Changes in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.6-1.8, P = 0.68) and infection control policies (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.32) were not statistically significant. In Tajikistan, statistically significant improvements were seen in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), routine labour and vaginal birth care (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), infection control policies (x̄ = 1.4-1.8, P = 0.03), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.5-2.1, P = 0.02), postpartum haemorrhage (x̄ = 1.7-2.1, P = 0.04), and labour progress (x̄ = 1.2-2.1, P = 0.01). However, changes in caesarean section management (x̄ = 1.7-2.3, P = 0.09) and emergency preparedness (x̄ = 1.6-2.3, P = 0.11) did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WHO-guided participatory approach set benchmarks that improved labour management, obstetric care, infection control, and infrastructure. Expanding such initiatives, especially in underserved areas, is vital to sustain and scale their impact on maternal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic, standard-based, participatory assessment of a Continuous Quality Improvement project in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: results for maternal care.\",\"authors\":\"Tinatin Gagua, Dimitry Beglitse, Anna Calancae, Dilrabo Yunusova, Arsen Askerov, Zarina Ibragimova, Asel Orozalieva, Nurshaim Tilenbaeva, Shoira Yusupova, Oleg Kuzmenko, Sophie Jullien, Martin W Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.15.04176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal health care quality remains challenging in low- and middle-income countries, including Central Asia, where access to effective care is limited. While quality improvement (QI) interventions have been introduced, their impact is rarely evaluated. This study evaluates the effects of a two-year, complex QI intervention to improve maternal health services in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a pre-post intervention design to evaluate improvements in maternal health care quality in 19 hospitals across Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Following an initial assessment, an action plan was developed using a WHO-standardised tool. The study implemented a multi-faceted intervention to improve maternal health. A 0-3 scoring system measured changes over time. No control group was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Kyrgyzstan, significant improvements were observed in caesarean section management (mean (x̄) = 1.9-2.1, P = 0.01), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.01), postpartum haemorrhage management (x̄ = 1.8-2.1, P = 0.03), and preeclampsia management (x̄ = 1.4-1.9, P = 0.01). Changes in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.6-1.8, P = 0.68) and infection control policies (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.32) were not statistically significant. In Tajikistan, statistically significant improvements were seen in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), routine labour and vaginal birth care (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), infection control policies (x̄ = 1.4-1.8, P = 0.03), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.5-2.1, P = 0.02), postpartum haemorrhage (x̄ = 1.7-2.1, P = 0.04), and labour progress (x̄ = 1.2-2.1, P = 0.01). However, changes in caesarean section management (x̄ = 1.7-2.3, P = 0.09) and emergency preparedness (x̄ = 1.6-2.3, P = 0.11) did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WHO-guided participatory approach set benchmarks that improved labour management, obstetric care, infection control, and infrastructure. Expanding such initiatives, especially in underserved areas, is vital to sustain and scale their impact on maternal health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"04176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099276/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04176\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在包括中亚在内的低收入和中等收入国家,孕产妇保健质量仍然具有挑战性,这些国家获得有效护理的机会有限。虽然已经引入了质量改进(QI)干预措施,但很少对其影响进行评估。本研究评估了吉尔吉斯斯坦和塔吉克斯坦为期两年的复杂QI干预措施对改善孕产妇保健服务的影响。方法:我们采用干预前后设计来评估吉尔吉斯斯坦和塔吉克斯坦19家医院孕产妇保健质量的改善。在初步评估之后,使用世卫组织标准化工具制定了一项行动计划。这项研究实施了多方面的干预措施,以改善产妇保健。一个0-3分的评分系统测量了随着时间的变化。未纳入对照组。结果:在吉尔吉斯斯坦,剖宫产管理(平均值(x ā) = 1.9-2.1, P = 0.01)、产妇并发症管理(x ā = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.01)、产后出血管理(x ā = 1.8-2.1, P = 0.03)和先兆子痫管理(x ā = 1.4-1.9, P = 0.01)均有显著改善。医院支持服务(x′= 1.6 ~ 1.8,P = 0.68)和感染控制政策(x′= 1.6 ~ 1.9,P = 0.32)的变化无统计学意义。在塔吉克斯坦,医院支持服务(x′′= 1.4-2.0,P = 0.01)、常规分娩和阴道分娩护理(x′′= 1.4-2.0,P = 0.01)、感染控制政策(x′′= 1.4-1.8,P = 0.03)、产妇并发症管理(x′′= 1.5-2.1,P = 0.02)、产后出血(x′′= 1.7-2.1,P = 0.04)和分娩进展(x′′= 1.2-2.1,P = 0.01)在统计学上均有显著改善。剖宫产管理(x′= 1.7 ~ 2.3,P = 0.09)和应急准备(x′= 1.6 ~ 2.3,P = 0.11)的变化无统计学意义。结论:世卫组织指导的参与性方法设定了改善劳动管理、产科护理、感染控制和基础设施的基准。扩大此类举措,特别是在服务不足的地区,对于维持和扩大其对孕产妇保健的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic, standard-based, participatory assessment of a Continuous Quality Improvement project in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: results for maternal care.

Background: Maternal health care quality remains challenging in low- and middle-income countries, including Central Asia, where access to effective care is limited. While quality improvement (QI) interventions have been introduced, their impact is rarely evaluated. This study evaluates the effects of a two-year, complex QI intervention to improve maternal health services in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

Methods: We employed a pre-post intervention design to evaluate improvements in maternal health care quality in 19 hospitals across Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Following an initial assessment, an action plan was developed using a WHO-standardised tool. The study implemented a multi-faceted intervention to improve maternal health. A 0-3 scoring system measured changes over time. No control group was included.

Results: In Kyrgyzstan, significant improvements were observed in caesarean section management (mean (x̄) = 1.9-2.1, P = 0.01), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.01), postpartum haemorrhage management (x̄ = 1.8-2.1, P = 0.03), and preeclampsia management (x̄ = 1.4-1.9, P = 0.01). Changes in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.6-1.8, P = 0.68) and infection control policies (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.32) were not statistically significant. In Tajikistan, statistically significant improvements were seen in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), routine labour and vaginal birth care (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), infection control policies (x̄ = 1.4-1.8, P = 0.03), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.5-2.1, P = 0.02), postpartum haemorrhage (x̄ = 1.7-2.1, P = 0.04), and labour progress (x̄ = 1.2-2.1, P = 0.01). However, changes in caesarean section management (x̄ = 1.7-2.3, P = 0.09) and emergency preparedness (x̄ = 1.6-2.3, P = 0.11) did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: The WHO-guided participatory approach set benchmarks that improved labour management, obstetric care, infection control, and infrastructure. Expanding such initiatives, especially in underserved areas, is vital to sustain and scale their impact on maternal health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信