一项随机临床试验:热疗法或有氧运动训练对未经治疗的高血压患者的血压没有影响。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of applied physiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-23 DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00959.2024
Brendan W Kaiser, Lindan N Comrada, Brandon M Gibson, Emma L Reed, Kieran S S Abbotts, Emily A Larson, Madison I Serrano, Karen Wiedenfeld Needham, Christopher L Chapman, John R Halliwill, Christopher T Minson
{"title":"一项随机临床试验:热疗法或有氧运动训练对未经治疗的高血压患者的血压没有影响。","authors":"Brendan W Kaiser, Lindan N Comrada, Brandon M Gibson, Emma L Reed, Kieran S S Abbotts, Emily A Larson, Madison I Serrano, Karen Wiedenfeld Needham, Christopher L Chapman, John R Halliwill, Christopher T Minson","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00959.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertension, a primary and preventable risk factor for cardiovascular and kidney disease, may be ameliorated by nonpharmacological lifestyle interventions such as aerobic exercise and heat therapy. Although both interventions have been demonstrated to reduce blood pressure in a variety of populations, there are no studies that have directly compared these methods for lowering blood pressure in adults with untreated hypertension. Forty-one adults (48 [35, 56] yr) were randomized to complete either 30 sessions of aerobic exercise training (<i>n</i> = 20) or heat therapy (<i>n</i> = 21) over 8-10 wk. Ambulatory and in-clinic blood pressure and markers of cardiorespiratory fitness, arterial stiffness, and renal function were measured at baseline (PRE) and after 30 heat therapy or exercise training sessions (POST). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure was not different following either aerobic exercise (PRE: 139 [134, 144] vs. POST: 140 [134, 145] mmHg; <i>P</i> = 0.65) or heat therapy (134 [128, 139] vs. 134 [128, 139]; <i>P</i> = 0.81) nor was 24-h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure after aerobic exercise (PRE: 85 [81, 89] vs. POST: 86 [83, 90] mmHg; <i>P</i> = 0.28) or heat therapy (81 [78, 85] vs. 81 [77, 85]; <i>P</i> = 0.44). In-clinic blood pressure was similarly unchanged following both aerobic exercise and heat therapy. These pressure responses, along with arterial stiffness and kidney function biomarkers, did not differ between treatment groups (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). These data suggest that, during an 8- to 10-wk intervention, exercise training and heat therapy have similar and limited impacts on blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and biomarkers of kidney function among adults with untreated hypertension.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Exercise training represents a crucial lifestyle intervention for improving blood pressure, yet many adults do not meet recommendations for physical activity. Heat therapy was tested against aerobic exercise training as a potential alternative lifestyle intervention. Neither heat therapy nor exercise training was effective for the treatment of hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1600-1614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No effect of either heat therapy or aerobic exercise training on blood pressure in adults with untreated hypertension: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Brendan W Kaiser, Lindan N Comrada, Brandon M Gibson, Emma L Reed, Kieran S S Abbotts, Emily A Larson, Madison I Serrano, Karen Wiedenfeld Needham, Christopher L Chapman, John R Halliwill, Christopher T Minson\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/japplphysiol.00959.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hypertension, a primary and preventable risk factor for cardiovascular and kidney disease, may be ameliorated by nonpharmacological lifestyle interventions such as aerobic exercise and heat therapy. Although both interventions have been demonstrated to reduce blood pressure in a variety of populations, there are no studies that have directly compared these methods for lowering blood pressure in adults with untreated hypertension. Forty-one adults (48 [35, 56] yr) were randomized to complete either 30 sessions of aerobic exercise training (<i>n</i> = 20) or heat therapy (<i>n</i> = 21) over 8-10 wk. Ambulatory and in-clinic blood pressure and markers of cardiorespiratory fitness, arterial stiffness, and renal function were measured at baseline (PRE) and after 30 heat therapy or exercise training sessions (POST). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure was not different following either aerobic exercise (PRE: 139 [134, 144] vs. POST: 140 [134, 145] mmHg; <i>P</i> = 0.65) or heat therapy (134 [128, 139] vs. 134 [128, 139]; <i>P</i> = 0.81) nor was 24-h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure after aerobic exercise (PRE: 85 [81, 89] vs. POST: 86 [83, 90] mmHg; <i>P</i> = 0.28) or heat therapy (81 [78, 85] vs. 81 [77, 85]; <i>P</i> = 0.44). In-clinic blood pressure was similarly unchanged following both aerobic exercise and heat therapy. These pressure responses, along with arterial stiffness and kidney function biomarkers, did not differ between treatment groups (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). These data suggest that, during an 8- to 10-wk intervention, exercise training and heat therapy have similar and limited impacts on blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and biomarkers of kidney function among adults with untreated hypertension.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Exercise training represents a crucial lifestyle intervention for improving blood pressure, yet many adults do not meet recommendations for physical activity. Heat therapy was tested against aerobic exercise training as a potential alternative lifestyle intervention. Neither heat therapy nor exercise training was effective for the treatment of hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1600-1614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00959.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00959.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高血压是心血管和肾脏疾病的主要和可预防的危险因素,可以通过有氧运动和热疗法等非药物生活方式干预来改善。虽然这两种干预措施已被证明可以降低各种人群的血压,但没有研究直接比较这两种方法对未经治疗的高血压患者的血压降低效果。41名成年人(48岁[35,56]岁)被随机分配,在8-10周内完成30次有氧运动训练(n=20)或热疗法(n=21)。在基线(PRE)和30次热疗或运动训练(POST)后测量门诊和门诊血压和心肺健康、动脉僵硬和肾功能指标。有氧运动后24小时动态收缩压无差异(前:139 [134,144]vs后:140 [134,145]mmHg;P =0.65)或热疗(134 [128,139]vs 134 [128, 139];p=0.81),有氧运动后24小时动态舒张压(PRE: 85 [81, 89] vs POST: 86 [83, 90] mmHg;P =0.28)或热疗(81 [78,85]vs 81 [77,85];p = 0.44)。在有氧运动和热疗后,临床血压也没有变化。这些压力反应,以及动脉硬度和肾功能生物标志物,在治疗组之间没有差异(均p < 0.05)。这些数据表明,在8至10周的干预期间,运动训练和热疗法对未经治疗的高血压患者的血压、动脉硬度和肾功能生物标志物的影响相似且有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No effect of either heat therapy or aerobic exercise training on blood pressure in adults with untreated hypertension: a randomized clinical trial.

Hypertension, a primary and preventable risk factor for cardiovascular and kidney disease, may be ameliorated by nonpharmacological lifestyle interventions such as aerobic exercise and heat therapy. Although both interventions have been demonstrated to reduce blood pressure in a variety of populations, there are no studies that have directly compared these methods for lowering blood pressure in adults with untreated hypertension. Forty-one adults (48 [35, 56] yr) were randomized to complete either 30 sessions of aerobic exercise training (n = 20) or heat therapy (n = 21) over 8-10 wk. Ambulatory and in-clinic blood pressure and markers of cardiorespiratory fitness, arterial stiffness, and renal function were measured at baseline (PRE) and after 30 heat therapy or exercise training sessions (POST). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure was not different following either aerobic exercise (PRE: 139 [134, 144] vs. POST: 140 [134, 145] mmHg; P = 0.65) or heat therapy (134 [128, 139] vs. 134 [128, 139]; P = 0.81) nor was 24-h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure after aerobic exercise (PRE: 85 [81, 89] vs. POST: 86 [83, 90] mmHg; P = 0.28) or heat therapy (81 [78, 85] vs. 81 [77, 85]; P = 0.44). In-clinic blood pressure was similarly unchanged following both aerobic exercise and heat therapy. These pressure responses, along with arterial stiffness and kidney function biomarkers, did not differ between treatment groups (all P > 0.05). These data suggest that, during an 8- to 10-wk intervention, exercise training and heat therapy have similar and limited impacts on blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and biomarkers of kidney function among adults with untreated hypertension.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Exercise training represents a crucial lifestyle intervention for improving blood pressure, yet many adults do not meet recommendations for physical activity. Heat therapy was tested against aerobic exercise training as a potential alternative lifestyle intervention. Neither heat therapy nor exercise training was effective for the treatment of hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信