Hans Lovén, Rune Erichsen, Anders Tøttrup, Thue Bisgaard
{"title":"炎性肠病患者择期腹股沟疝补片术后的长期预后","authors":"Hans Lovén, Rune Erichsen, Anders Tøttrup, Thue Bisgaard","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03362-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of long-term outcomes following elective inguinal hernia mesh-repair in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains limited. Pathophysiological differences between Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) may influence mesh-related complications and recurrence risk. The primary objective was to assess the reoperation risk for mesh-related complications, and secondarily, recurrence after inguinal hernia mesh-repair in patients with CD and UC. The impact of fistulising disease (intra-abdominal/perianal) and surgical technique (open/laparoscopic) on both outcomes was also analysed based on the available data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide cohort study (2007-2016) followed IBD patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia mesh-repair to assess risks of reoperation for mesh-related complications or recurrence. Risks were estimated using cumulative incidence and Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,072 patients with IBD (CD = 264, UC = 698, IBD-unclassified = 110), the five-year reoperation risk was 0.5% for mesh-related complications and 5.7% for recurrence. Fistulising disease was present in 6.9% (n = 74) of all patients with IBD: perianal in 95% (n = 70) and intra-abdominal in 5% (n = 4). There were too few mesh-related complications (n = 5) to support statistical analysis of this outcome. Recurrence risk was not significantly affected by IBD subtype: CD (reference), UC (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.77-3.64), IBD-U (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.24-3.44), or surgical technique: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) (reference), and Lichtenstein (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.43-1.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that inguinal hernia mesh-repair is also safe among IBD patients regardless of subtype, surgical technique, or perianal fistulation. Similarly, recurrence risk was unaffected by these factors. Limited data prevented conclusions on intra-abdominal fistulising disease as a potential risk-factor for poor surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes after elective inguinal hernia mesh-repair in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.\",\"authors\":\"Hans Lovén, Rune Erichsen, Anders Tøttrup, Thue Bisgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10029-025-03362-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of long-term outcomes following elective inguinal hernia mesh-repair in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains limited. Pathophysiological differences between Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) may influence mesh-related complications and recurrence risk. The primary objective was to assess the reoperation risk for mesh-related complications, and secondarily, recurrence after inguinal hernia mesh-repair in patients with CD and UC. The impact of fistulising disease (intra-abdominal/perianal) and surgical technique (open/laparoscopic) on both outcomes was also analysed based on the available data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide cohort study (2007-2016) followed IBD patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia mesh-repair to assess risks of reoperation for mesh-related complications or recurrence. Risks were estimated using cumulative incidence and Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,072 patients with IBD (CD = 264, UC = 698, IBD-unclassified = 110), the five-year reoperation risk was 0.5% for mesh-related complications and 5.7% for recurrence. Fistulising disease was present in 6.9% (n = 74) of all patients with IBD: perianal in 95% (n = 70) and intra-abdominal in 5% (n = 4). There were too few mesh-related complications (n = 5) to support statistical analysis of this outcome. Recurrence risk was not significantly affected by IBD subtype: CD (reference), UC (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.77-3.64), IBD-U (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.24-3.44), or surgical technique: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) (reference), and Lichtenstein (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.43-1.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that inguinal hernia mesh-repair is also safe among IBD patients regardless of subtype, surgical technique, or perianal fistulation. Similarly, recurrence risk was unaffected by these factors. Limited data prevented conclusions on intra-abdominal fistulising disease as a potential risk-factor for poor surgical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hernia\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102129/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hernia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03362-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03362-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term outcomes after elective inguinal hernia mesh-repair in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Background: Knowledge of long-term outcomes following elective inguinal hernia mesh-repair in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains limited. Pathophysiological differences between Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) may influence mesh-related complications and recurrence risk. The primary objective was to assess the reoperation risk for mesh-related complications, and secondarily, recurrence after inguinal hernia mesh-repair in patients with CD and UC. The impact of fistulising disease (intra-abdominal/perianal) and surgical technique (open/laparoscopic) on both outcomes was also analysed based on the available data.
Methods: This nationwide cohort study (2007-2016) followed IBD patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia mesh-repair to assess risks of reoperation for mesh-related complications or recurrence. Risks were estimated using cumulative incidence and Cox regression analyses.
Results: Among 1,072 patients with IBD (CD = 264, UC = 698, IBD-unclassified = 110), the five-year reoperation risk was 0.5% for mesh-related complications and 5.7% for recurrence. Fistulising disease was present in 6.9% (n = 74) of all patients with IBD: perianal in 95% (n = 70) and intra-abdominal in 5% (n = 4). There were too few mesh-related complications (n = 5) to support statistical analysis of this outcome. Recurrence risk was not significantly affected by IBD subtype: CD (reference), UC (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.77-3.64), IBD-U (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.24-3.44), or surgical technique: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) (reference), and Lichtenstein (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.43-1.47).
Conclusion: This study suggests that inguinal hernia mesh-repair is also safe among IBD patients regardless of subtype, surgical technique, or perianal fistulation. Similarly, recurrence risk was unaffected by these factors. Limited data prevented conclusions on intra-abdominal fistulising disease as a potential risk-factor for poor surgical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery.
Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.