叶酸代谢相关基因的特征揭示肺腺癌的预后和治疗策略。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yanting Dong, Xiaoyan Wang, Chuanchuan Dong, Peiqi Li, Zhuola Liu, Xinrui Tian
{"title":"叶酸代谢相关基因的特征揭示肺腺癌的预后和治疗策略。","authors":"Yanting Dong, Xiaoyan Wang, Chuanchuan Dong, Peiqi Li, Zhuola Liu, Xinrui Tian","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03694-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype of lung cancer. Folic acid metabolism-related genes (FAMGs) have received increased attention because of their distinct role in DNA synthesis and repair. Nevertheless, the function of FAMGs in LUAD remains ambiguous.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LUAD transcriptome data from GEO and TCGA were analyzed. Patients were classified into two clusters based on gene expression levels, revealing distinct overall survival (OS) outcomes. Common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between LUAD and normal tissues, as well as between the two clusters. A prognostic risk model was established using Cox regression analysis to predict outcomes of LUAD patients and was validated with Kaplan-Meier and ROC curve analysis. Clinical correlations and enrichment analyses were carried out to explore the functions of DEGs and their associations with clinical characteristics of LUAD patients. The tumor microenvironment and drug sensitivity were evaluated between two risk subgroups. Moreover, expression levels of prognostic genes were validated across datasets using the Wilcoxon-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified seventy-seven common DEGs and nine prognostic genes (ANLN, PLK1, DLGAP5, PRC1, CYP4B1, MKI67, KIF23, BIRC5, TK1). The risk model could effectively predict the prognosis of LUAD patients. Clinical correlation analysis revealed that age, pathologic-T, pathologic-N, and tumor stage were significantly correlated with the risk score. Enrichment analysis showed that DEGs between the two risk subgroups were predominantly enriched in cell cycle and cellular senescence pathways. Differences in immune cell infiltration and immunotherapy markers were markedly noted between the two risk subgroups. Drug sensitivity analysis disclosed significantly diverse responses to sixty-eight drugs between the two risk subgroups. Consistent expression tendencies of prognostic genes were observed across datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prognostic model based on FAMGs demonstrates considerable potential for guiding diagnosis and clinical management of LUAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of folic acid metabolism-related genes unveil prognosis and treatment strategy in lung adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Yanting Dong, Xiaoyan Wang, Chuanchuan Dong, Peiqi Li, Zhuola Liu, Xinrui Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-025-03694-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype of lung cancer. Folic acid metabolism-related genes (FAMGs) have received increased attention because of their distinct role in DNA synthesis and repair. Nevertheless, the function of FAMGs in LUAD remains ambiguous.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LUAD transcriptome data from GEO and TCGA were analyzed. Patients were classified into two clusters based on gene expression levels, revealing distinct overall survival (OS) outcomes. Common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between LUAD and normal tissues, as well as between the two clusters. A prognostic risk model was established using Cox regression analysis to predict outcomes of LUAD patients and was validated with Kaplan-Meier and ROC curve analysis. Clinical correlations and enrichment analyses were carried out to explore the functions of DEGs and their associations with clinical characteristics of LUAD patients. The tumor microenvironment and drug sensitivity were evaluated between two risk subgroups. Moreover, expression levels of prognostic genes were validated across datasets using the Wilcoxon-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified seventy-seven common DEGs and nine prognostic genes (ANLN, PLK1, DLGAP5, PRC1, CYP4B1, MKI67, KIF23, BIRC5, TK1). The risk model could effectively predict the prognosis of LUAD patients. Clinical correlation analysis revealed that age, pathologic-T, pathologic-N, and tumor stage were significantly correlated with the risk score. Enrichment analysis showed that DEGs between the two risk subgroups were predominantly enriched in cell cycle and cellular senescence pathways. Differences in immune cell infiltration and immunotherapy markers were markedly noted between the two risk subgroups. Drug sensitivity analysis disclosed significantly diverse responses to sixty-eight drugs between the two risk subgroups. Consistent expression tendencies of prognostic genes were observed across datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prognostic model based on FAMGs demonstrates considerable potential for guiding diagnosis and clinical management of LUAD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101037/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03694-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03694-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺腺癌(LUAD)是最常见的肺癌亚型。叶酸代谢相关基因(FAMGs)因其在DNA合成和修复中的独特作用而受到越来越多的关注。然而,famg在LUAD中的作用仍然不明确。方法:对GEO和TCGA的LUAD转录组数据进行分析。根据基因表达水平将患者分为两组,揭示了不同的总生存期(OS)结果。共同差异表达基因(DEGs)在LUAD和正常组织之间以及两个集群之间被鉴定出来。采用Cox回归分析建立预测LUAD患者预后的预后风险模型,并采用Kaplan-Meier和ROC曲线分析进行验证。通过临床相关性和富集分析,探讨deg的功能及其与LUAD患者临床特征的关系。评估两个危险亚组的肿瘤微环境和药物敏感性。此外,预后基因的表达水平使用wilcoxon测试跨数据集进行验证。结果:共鉴定出77个常见deg和9个预后基因(ANLN、PLK1、DLGAP5、PRC1、CYP4B1、MKI67、KIF23、BIRC5、TK1)。该风险模型能有效预测LUAD患者的预后。临床相关分析显示,年龄、病理t、病理n、肿瘤分期与风险评分显著相关。富集分析表明,两个风险亚组之间的deg主要富集于细胞周期和细胞衰老途径。免疫细胞浸润和免疫治疗标志物在两个危险亚组之间存在显著差异。药物敏感性分析显示,两个风险亚组对68种药物的反应存在显著差异。在数据集中观察到预后基因一致的表达趋势。结论:基于famg的LUAD预后模型在指导LUAD患者的诊断和临床管理方面具有较大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of folic acid metabolism-related genes unveil prognosis and treatment strategy in lung adenocarcinoma.

Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype of lung cancer. Folic acid metabolism-related genes (FAMGs) have received increased attention because of their distinct role in DNA synthesis and repair. Nevertheless, the function of FAMGs in LUAD remains ambiguous.

Methods: LUAD transcriptome data from GEO and TCGA were analyzed. Patients were classified into two clusters based on gene expression levels, revealing distinct overall survival (OS) outcomes. Common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between LUAD and normal tissues, as well as between the two clusters. A prognostic risk model was established using Cox regression analysis to predict outcomes of LUAD patients and was validated with Kaplan-Meier and ROC curve analysis. Clinical correlations and enrichment analyses were carried out to explore the functions of DEGs and their associations with clinical characteristics of LUAD patients. The tumor microenvironment and drug sensitivity were evaluated between two risk subgroups. Moreover, expression levels of prognostic genes were validated across datasets using the Wilcoxon-test.

Results: The study identified seventy-seven common DEGs and nine prognostic genes (ANLN, PLK1, DLGAP5, PRC1, CYP4B1, MKI67, KIF23, BIRC5, TK1). The risk model could effectively predict the prognosis of LUAD patients. Clinical correlation analysis revealed that age, pathologic-T, pathologic-N, and tumor stage were significantly correlated with the risk score. Enrichment analysis showed that DEGs between the two risk subgroups were predominantly enriched in cell cycle and cellular senescence pathways. Differences in immune cell infiltration and immunotherapy markers were markedly noted between the two risk subgroups. Drug sensitivity analysis disclosed significantly diverse responses to sixty-eight drugs between the two risk subgroups. Consistent expression tendencies of prognostic genes were observed across datasets.

Conclusion: The prognostic model based on FAMGs demonstrates considerable potential for guiding diagnosis and clinical management of LUAD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信