Diogo Fp Marques, Dory Kovacs, Miguel-Angel Sanchez-Ruiz, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Ausenda Machado, Clara Mazagatos, Susana Monge, Lisa Domegan, Joan O'Donnell, Mariette Hooiveld, Hanne-Dorthe Emborg, Baltazar Nunes, Carlos Carvalho, Angela Mc Rose
{"title":"欧洲严重急性呼吸道感染(SARI)监测评价,27个欧洲国家,2022/23。","authors":"Diogo Fp Marques, Dory Kovacs, Miguel-Angel Sanchez-Ruiz, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Ausenda Machado, Clara Mazagatos, Susana Monge, Lisa Domegan, Joan O'Donnell, Mariette Hooiveld, Hanne-Dorthe Emborg, Baltazar Nunes, Carlos Carvalho, Angela Mc Rose","doi":"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.20.2400655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundBetween 2020 and 2023, ECDC has supported 21 of 30 EU/EEA and six Western Balkan countries by enhancing severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) surveillance to monitor trends, detect unexpected events, evaluate public health interventions, identify risk factors and support vaccine effectiveness studies. Using diverse strategies, countries have implemented SARI surveillance and reported data at national/European levels.AimWe evaluated European-level SARI surveillance and provided recommendations to achieve objectives and improve key attribute performance.MethodsWe analysed 2022/23 surveillance data for completeness. We administered a questionnaire, targeting country-level representatives, to evaluate surveillance attributes (meeting objectives, usefulness, acceptability, timeliness, representativeness) and identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.ResultsThirteen countries (13/27) reported data at European level. Data showed good overall completeness but varied across countries and some variables need improvement (vaccination, sequencing). The questionnaire was completed by all 27 countries. Most countries (23/27) reported that the system effectively monitored trends and considered it useful and acceptable (25/27), but only 16 found it timely and 14 representative. Challenges included insufficient case-based data, data linkage issues and insufficient data completeness. Slow/inefficient manual data extraction affected timeliness, while insufficient geographical coverage affected representativeness. Multi-pathogen surveillance was identified as the main strength, heterogeneity of systems the main weakness, improvements of hospital information systems the main opportunity, and lack of sustainable funding the main threat.ConclusionsSARI surveillance was perceived as effective in monitoring trends, useful and acceptable. To achieve additional objectives and enhance timeliness and representativeness, we recommend improving data completeness, digitalisation/automation and geographical coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":12161,"journal":{"name":"Eurosurveillance","volume":"30 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of European severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) surveillance, 27 European countries, 2022/23.\",\"authors\":\"Diogo Fp Marques, Dory Kovacs, Miguel-Angel Sanchez-Ruiz, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Ausenda Machado, Clara Mazagatos, Susana Monge, Lisa Domegan, Joan O'Donnell, Mariette Hooiveld, Hanne-Dorthe Emborg, Baltazar Nunes, Carlos Carvalho, Angela Mc Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.20.2400655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundBetween 2020 and 2023, ECDC has supported 21 of 30 EU/EEA and six Western Balkan countries by enhancing severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) surveillance to monitor trends, detect unexpected events, evaluate public health interventions, identify risk factors and support vaccine effectiveness studies. Using diverse strategies, countries have implemented SARI surveillance and reported data at national/European levels.AimWe evaluated European-level SARI surveillance and provided recommendations to achieve objectives and improve key attribute performance.MethodsWe analysed 2022/23 surveillance data for completeness. We administered a questionnaire, targeting country-level representatives, to evaluate surveillance attributes (meeting objectives, usefulness, acceptability, timeliness, representativeness) and identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.ResultsThirteen countries (13/27) reported data at European level. Data showed good overall completeness but varied across countries and some variables need improvement (vaccination, sequencing). The questionnaire was completed by all 27 countries. Most countries (23/27) reported that the system effectively monitored trends and considered it useful and acceptable (25/27), but only 16 found it timely and 14 representative. Challenges included insufficient case-based data, data linkage issues and insufficient data completeness. Slow/inefficient manual data extraction affected timeliness, while insufficient geographical coverage affected representativeness. Multi-pathogen surveillance was identified as the main strength, heterogeneity of systems the main weakness, improvements of hospital information systems the main opportunity, and lack of sustainable funding the main threat.ConclusionsSARI surveillance was perceived as effective in monitoring trends, useful and acceptable. To achieve additional objectives and enhance timeliness and representativeness, we recommend improving data completeness, digitalisation/automation and geographical coverage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurosurveillance\",\"volume\":\"30 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurosurveillance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.20.2400655\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosurveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.20.2400655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of European severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) surveillance, 27 European countries, 2022/23.
BackgroundBetween 2020 and 2023, ECDC has supported 21 of 30 EU/EEA and six Western Balkan countries by enhancing severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) surveillance to monitor trends, detect unexpected events, evaluate public health interventions, identify risk factors and support vaccine effectiveness studies. Using diverse strategies, countries have implemented SARI surveillance and reported data at national/European levels.AimWe evaluated European-level SARI surveillance and provided recommendations to achieve objectives and improve key attribute performance.MethodsWe analysed 2022/23 surveillance data for completeness. We administered a questionnaire, targeting country-level representatives, to evaluate surveillance attributes (meeting objectives, usefulness, acceptability, timeliness, representativeness) and identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.ResultsThirteen countries (13/27) reported data at European level. Data showed good overall completeness but varied across countries and some variables need improvement (vaccination, sequencing). The questionnaire was completed by all 27 countries. Most countries (23/27) reported that the system effectively monitored trends and considered it useful and acceptable (25/27), but only 16 found it timely and 14 representative. Challenges included insufficient case-based data, data linkage issues and insufficient data completeness. Slow/inefficient manual data extraction affected timeliness, while insufficient geographical coverage affected representativeness. Multi-pathogen surveillance was identified as the main strength, heterogeneity of systems the main weakness, improvements of hospital information systems the main opportunity, and lack of sustainable funding the main threat.ConclusionsSARI surveillance was perceived as effective in monitoring trends, useful and acceptable. To achieve additional objectives and enhance timeliness and representativeness, we recommend improving data completeness, digitalisation/automation and geographical coverage.
期刊介绍:
Eurosurveillance is a European peer-reviewed journal focusing on the epidemiology, surveillance, prevention, and control of communicable diseases relevant to Europe.It is a weekly online journal, with 50 issues per year published on Thursdays. The journal includes short rapid communications, in-depth research articles, surveillance reports, reviews, and perspective papers. It excels in timely publication of authoritative papers on ongoing outbreaks or other public health events. Under special circumstances when current events need to be urgently communicated to readers for rapid public health action, e-alerts can be released outside of the regular publishing schedule. Additionally, topical compilations and special issues may be provided in PDF format.