立体定向放射外科治疗儿童动静脉畸形:PRISMA系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Garrett W Thrash, Riley Ethan Evans, Yifei Sun, Anne C Roberts, Cameron Derryberry, Andrew T Hale, Somnath Das, Hunter Boudreau, Jordan A George, Travis J Atchley, Jeffrey P Blount, Brandon G Rocque, James M Johnston, Jesse G Jones
{"title":"立体定向放射外科治疗儿童动静脉畸形:PRISMA系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Garrett W Thrash, Riley Ethan Evans, Yifei Sun, Anne C Roberts, Cameron Derryberry, Andrew T Hale, Somnath Das, Hunter Boudreau, Jordan A George, Travis J Atchley, Jeffrey P Blount, Brandon G Rocque, James M Johnston, Jesse G Jones","doi":"10.1007/s00381-025-06835-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered a safe definitive treatment for pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) upon indicated presentations. There are no published guidelines by the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) detailed with indications or characteristics that warrant SRS, other than the guideline that SRS is a safe and efficacious treatment for pediatric AVMs. SRS is performed using either Gamma Knife (GK) or Linear Accelerator (LINAC). This systematic review aims to uncover treatment, differences in GK and LINAC outcomes, and AVM characteristics that lead to high obliteration rates and suggest future studies to determine treatment decisions, raise obliteration rates, and lower complication rates in SRS treatment of pediatric AVMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS utilizing search terms related to pediatric patients, AVMS, and SRS. We collected data from the 32 full-text studies and 4 abstracts that met inclusion criteria. Subsequent pooled analysis was performed on GK vs LINAC obliteration rates, followed by sub-cohort analysis of all SRS patients with hemorrhagic presentation, Spetzler-Martin (SM) Grade, and prior procedure and their effect on obliteration rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 36 studies reported 3425 patients, with a slight male preponderance (1662 patients, 48.5%). The obliteration analysis included 2834 patients that met follow-up criteria and contained obliteration data. The weighted mean age was 12.63 years. Pooled cohort analysis found no significant difference in obliteration proportions when comparing GK to LINAC (P = 0.7449), with an overall obliteration rate of 63% in patients with at least 1 year follow-up. The sub-cohort analysis of all patients treated with SRS revealed that presentation with AVM hemorrhage was associated with increased obliteration (CE: RR = 1.22 [95%CI = 1.09-1.35; RE: RR = 1.22, 95%CI = 10.6-1.40; prediction interval = 1.07-1.38) with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 17.1%, τ<sup>2</sup> < 0.0001, p = 0.2902). Smaller SM grade was not statistically associated with increased obliteration (CE: RR = 1.25 [95%CI = 0.87-1.81]; RE: RR = 1.84 [95%CI = 0.97-3.50]; prediction interval = 0.38-8.86) and moderate levels of heterogeneity were detected (I<sup>2</sup> = 45.2%, τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.2668, p = 0.1042). Procedure prior to SRS also had higher obliteration rates than no prior procedure (CE: RR = 0.77 [95%CI = 0.61-0.86]; RE: RR = 0.71 [95%CI = 0.54-0.92]; prediction interval = 0.36-1.39) with low to moderate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 27.6%, τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.0.0264, p = 0.2466).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SRS is a safe and effective treatment for pediatric AVMs. This study suggests that there are no differences in obliteration between GK and LINAC, with increased obliteration in patients with hemorrhage at presentation and procedures prior to SRS treatment. Further multicenter, prospective studies are necessary to dictate future treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9970,"journal":{"name":"Child's Nervous System","volume":"41 1","pages":"188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic radiosurgery treatment of pediatric arteriovenous malformations: a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Garrett W Thrash, Riley Ethan Evans, Yifei Sun, Anne C Roberts, Cameron Derryberry, Andrew T Hale, Somnath Das, Hunter Boudreau, Jordan A George, Travis J Atchley, Jeffrey P Blount, Brandon G Rocque, James M Johnston, Jesse G Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00381-025-06835-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered a safe definitive treatment for pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) upon indicated presentations. There are no published guidelines by the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) detailed with indications or characteristics that warrant SRS, other than the guideline that SRS is a safe and efficacious treatment for pediatric AVMs. SRS is performed using either Gamma Knife (GK) or Linear Accelerator (LINAC). This systematic review aims to uncover treatment, differences in GK and LINAC outcomes, and AVM characteristics that lead to high obliteration rates and suggest future studies to determine treatment decisions, raise obliteration rates, and lower complication rates in SRS treatment of pediatric AVMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS utilizing search terms related to pediatric patients, AVMS, and SRS. We collected data from the 32 full-text studies and 4 abstracts that met inclusion criteria. Subsequent pooled analysis was performed on GK vs LINAC obliteration rates, followed by sub-cohort analysis of all SRS patients with hemorrhagic presentation, Spetzler-Martin (SM) Grade, and prior procedure and their effect on obliteration rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 36 studies reported 3425 patients, with a slight male preponderance (1662 patients, 48.5%). The obliteration analysis included 2834 patients that met follow-up criteria and contained obliteration data. The weighted mean age was 12.63 years. Pooled cohort analysis found no significant difference in obliteration proportions when comparing GK to LINAC (P = 0.7449), with an overall obliteration rate of 63% in patients with at least 1 year follow-up. The sub-cohort analysis of all patients treated with SRS revealed that presentation with AVM hemorrhage was associated with increased obliteration (CE: RR = 1.22 [95%CI = 1.09-1.35; RE: RR = 1.22, 95%CI = 10.6-1.40; prediction interval = 1.07-1.38) with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 17.1%, τ<sup>2</sup> < 0.0001, p = 0.2902). Smaller SM grade was not statistically associated with increased obliteration (CE: RR = 1.25 [95%CI = 0.87-1.81]; RE: RR = 1.84 [95%CI = 0.97-3.50]; prediction interval = 0.38-8.86) and moderate levels of heterogeneity were detected (I<sup>2</sup> = 45.2%, τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.2668, p = 0.1042). Procedure prior to SRS also had higher obliteration rates than no prior procedure (CE: RR = 0.77 [95%CI = 0.61-0.86]; RE: RR = 0.71 [95%CI = 0.54-0.92]; prediction interval = 0.36-1.39) with low to moderate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 27.6%, τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.0.0264, p = 0.2466).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SRS is a safe and effective treatment for pediatric AVMs. This study suggests that there are no differences in obliteration between GK and LINAC, with increased obliteration in patients with hemorrhage at presentation and procedures prior to SRS treatment. Further multicenter, prospective studies are necessary to dictate future treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child's Nervous System\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child's Nervous System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-025-06835-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-025-06835-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)被认为是儿童动静脉畸形(AVMs)的一种安全的明确治疗方法。国际立体定向放射外科学会(ISRS)没有公布的指南详细说明SRS的适应症或特征,除了SRS是一种安全有效的儿科AVMs治疗指南。SRS使用伽玛刀(GK)或直线加速器(LINAC)进行。本系统综述旨在揭示导致高闭塞率的治疗方法、GK和LINAC结果的差异以及AVM特征,并为未来的研究提供建议,以确定SRS治疗儿童AVM的治疗决策、提高闭塞率和降低并发症发生率。方法:我们根据PRISMA指南在PubMed、Embase和SCOPUS中使用与儿科患者、AVMS和SRS相关的搜索词进行了系统评价。我们收集了符合纳入标准的32篇全文研究和4篇摘要的数据。随后对GK和LINAC的闭塞率进行汇总分析,然后对所有SRS患者进行亚队列分析,包括出血表现、Spetzler-Martin (SM)分级、既往手术及其对闭塞率的影响。结果:36项研究报告3425例患者,男性略有优势(1662例,48.5%)。闭塞分析纳入2834例符合随访标准并包含闭塞资料的患者。加权平均年龄为12.63岁。合并队列分析发现,GK与LINAC的闭塞率无显著差异(P = 0.7449),随访至少1年的患者的总体闭塞率为63%。所有接受SRS治疗的患者的亚队列分析显示,AVM出血的表现与闭塞性增加有关(CE: RR = 1.22 [95%CI = 1.09-1.35;Re: rr = 1.22, 95%ci = 10.6-1.40;预测区间= 1.07 - -1.38)异质性较低(I2 = 17.1%,τ2 2 = 45.2%,τ2 = 0.2668,p = 0.1042)。SRS前手术的抹掉率也高于未手术(CE: RR = 0.77 [95%CI = 0.61-0.86];Re: rr = 0.71 [95%ci = 0.54-0.92];预测区间= 0.36 ~ 1.39),异质性低至中等(I2 = 27.6%, τ2 = 0.0.0264, p = 0.2466)。结论:SRS是一种安全有效的治疗小儿动静脉畸形的方法。这项研究表明,GK和LINAC之间的闭塞性没有差异,在SRS治疗前出现出血的患者中,闭塞性增加。需要进一步的多中心前瞻性研究来指导未来的治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stereotactic radiosurgery treatment of pediatric arteriovenous malformations: a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered a safe definitive treatment for pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) upon indicated presentations. There are no published guidelines by the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) detailed with indications or characteristics that warrant SRS, other than the guideline that SRS is a safe and efficacious treatment for pediatric AVMs. SRS is performed using either Gamma Knife (GK) or Linear Accelerator (LINAC). This systematic review aims to uncover treatment, differences in GK and LINAC outcomes, and AVM characteristics that lead to high obliteration rates and suggest future studies to determine treatment decisions, raise obliteration rates, and lower complication rates in SRS treatment of pediatric AVMs.

Methods: We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS utilizing search terms related to pediatric patients, AVMS, and SRS. We collected data from the 32 full-text studies and 4 abstracts that met inclusion criteria. Subsequent pooled analysis was performed on GK vs LINAC obliteration rates, followed by sub-cohort analysis of all SRS patients with hemorrhagic presentation, Spetzler-Martin (SM) Grade, and prior procedure and their effect on obliteration rates.

Results: The 36 studies reported 3425 patients, with a slight male preponderance (1662 patients, 48.5%). The obliteration analysis included 2834 patients that met follow-up criteria and contained obliteration data. The weighted mean age was 12.63 years. Pooled cohort analysis found no significant difference in obliteration proportions when comparing GK to LINAC (P = 0.7449), with an overall obliteration rate of 63% in patients with at least 1 year follow-up. The sub-cohort analysis of all patients treated with SRS revealed that presentation with AVM hemorrhage was associated with increased obliteration (CE: RR = 1.22 [95%CI = 1.09-1.35; RE: RR = 1.22, 95%CI = 10.6-1.40; prediction interval = 1.07-1.38) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 17.1%, τ2 < 0.0001, p = 0.2902). Smaller SM grade was not statistically associated with increased obliteration (CE: RR = 1.25 [95%CI = 0.87-1.81]; RE: RR = 1.84 [95%CI = 0.97-3.50]; prediction interval = 0.38-8.86) and moderate levels of heterogeneity were detected (I2 = 45.2%, τ2 = 0.2668, p = 0.1042). Procedure prior to SRS also had higher obliteration rates than no prior procedure (CE: RR = 0.77 [95%CI = 0.61-0.86]; RE: RR = 0.71 [95%CI = 0.54-0.92]; prediction interval = 0.36-1.39) with low to moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 27.6%, τ2 = 0.0.0264, p = 0.2466).

Conclusion: SRS is a safe and effective treatment for pediatric AVMs. This study suggests that there are no differences in obliteration between GK and LINAC, with increased obliteration in patients with hemorrhage at presentation and procedures prior to SRS treatment. Further multicenter, prospective studies are necessary to dictate future treatment decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child's Nervous System
Child's Nervous System 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal has been expanded to encompass all aspects of pediatric neurosciences concerning the developmental and acquired abnormalities of the nervous system and its coverings, functional disorders, epilepsy, spasticity, basic and clinical neuro-oncology, rehabilitation and trauma. Global pediatric neurosurgery is an additional field of interest that will be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信