异步三维摄影是评估蕈样真菌病临床严重程度的可靠工具。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Kelvin Truong, James Elhindi, Raquel Ruiz Araujo, Maria Jones-Caballero, Charmaine Chamberlin, Jillian Wells, Pablo Fernandez-Penas
{"title":"异步三维摄影是评估蕈样真菌病临床严重程度的可靠工具。","authors":"Kelvin Truong,&nbsp;James Elhindi,&nbsp;Raquel Ruiz Araujo,&nbsp;Maria Jones-Caballero,&nbsp;Charmaine Chamberlin,&nbsp;Jillian Wells,&nbsp;Pablo Fernandez-Penas","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Mycosis fungoides (MF) requires accurate clinical assessment for staging and management. Teledermatology aids remote evaluations, but there is limited data on the use of 3D total body photography (TBP) in assessing MF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of assessing a patient with MF using 3D TBP compared to in-person review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirteen MF patients were evaluated in-person using the modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) by two dermatologists, and then had 3D TBP taken. 8 weeks later, the dermatologists evaluated the virtual images. Three independent dermatologists reviewed the virtual images twice, 8 weeks apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed agreement between in-person and virtual assessments and test–retest reliability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was moderate agreement (ICC = 0.71) for intra-rater in-person and virtual assessments. Test–retest reliability of virtual assessment was good (ICC = 0.79). Evaluating inter-rater agreement between in-person and virtual assessments indicated good agreement (ICC = 0.80).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Limitations</h3>\n \n <p>3D TBP could not capture skin on the scalp, beneath clothing and on the soles of the feet, limiting complete assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical assessment of mSWAT using 3D TBP is as reliable as in-person mSWAT, suggesting its potential in teledermatology. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":"66 6","pages":"344-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajd.14531","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asynchronous 3D Photography Is a Reliable Tool for the Assessment of Mycosis Fungoides Clinical Severity\",\"authors\":\"Kelvin Truong,&nbsp;James Elhindi,&nbsp;Raquel Ruiz Araujo,&nbsp;Maria Jones-Caballero,&nbsp;Charmaine Chamberlin,&nbsp;Jillian Wells,&nbsp;Pablo Fernandez-Penas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajd.14531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mycosis fungoides (MF) requires accurate clinical assessment for staging and management. Teledermatology aids remote evaluations, but there is limited data on the use of 3D total body photography (TBP) in assessing MF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of assessing a patient with MF using 3D TBP compared to in-person review.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirteen MF patients were evaluated in-person using the modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) by two dermatologists, and then had 3D TBP taken. 8 weeks later, the dermatologists evaluated the virtual images. Three independent dermatologists reviewed the virtual images twice, 8 weeks apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed agreement between in-person and virtual assessments and test–retest reliability.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was moderate agreement (ICC = 0.71) for intra-rater in-person and virtual assessments. Test–retest reliability of virtual assessment was good (ICC = 0.79). Evaluating inter-rater agreement between in-person and virtual assessments indicated good agreement (ICC = 0.80).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Limitations</h3>\\n \\n <p>3D TBP could not capture skin on the scalp, beneath clothing and on the soles of the feet, limiting complete assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical assessment of mSWAT using 3D TBP is as reliable as in-person mSWAT, suggesting its potential in teledermatology. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"66 6\",\"pages\":\"344-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajd.14531\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajd.14531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajd.14531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:蕈样真菌病(MF)需要准确的临床分期和治疗评估。远程皮肤病学有助于远程评估,但在评估MF时使用3D全身摄影(TBP)的数据有限。目的:本研究评估使用3D TBP评估MF患者的准确性和可靠性,并与现场检查进行比较。方法:13例MF患者由2名皮肤科医生采用改进的严重程度加权评估工具(mSWAT)进行现场评估,并行3D TBP测量。8周后,皮肤科医生对虚拟图像进行评估。三位独立的皮肤科医生对虚拟图像进行了两次检查,间隔8周。类内相关系数(ICC)评估了面对面评估和虚拟评估之间的一致性以及重测信度。结果:评估者内部面对面评估和虚拟评估的一致性中等(ICC = 0.71)。虚拟评估的重测信度较好(ICC = 0.79)。评估面对面评估和虚拟评估之间的评估人员之间的一致性表明一致性良好(ICC = 0.80)。局限性:3D TBP不能捕获头皮、衣服下和脚底的皮肤,限制了完整的评估。结论:三维TBP技术对mSWAT的临床评价与现场mSWAT一样可靠,提示其在远程皮肤科的应用潜力。需要进一步的研究在更大的队列中验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Asynchronous 3D Photography Is a Reliable Tool for the Assessment of Mycosis Fungoides Clinical Severity

Asynchronous 3D Photography Is a Reliable Tool for the Assessment of Mycosis Fungoides Clinical Severity

Background

Mycosis fungoides (MF) requires accurate clinical assessment for staging and management. Teledermatology aids remote evaluations, but there is limited data on the use of 3D total body photography (TBP) in assessing MF.

Objective

This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of assessing a patient with MF using 3D TBP compared to in-person review.

Methods

Thirteen MF patients were evaluated in-person using the modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) by two dermatologists, and then had 3D TBP taken. 8 weeks later, the dermatologists evaluated the virtual images. Three independent dermatologists reviewed the virtual images twice, 8 weeks apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed agreement between in-person and virtual assessments and test–retest reliability.

Results

There was moderate agreement (ICC = 0.71) for intra-rater in-person and virtual assessments. Test–retest reliability of virtual assessment was good (ICC = 0.79). Evaluating inter-rater agreement between in-person and virtual assessments indicated good agreement (ICC = 0.80).

Limitations

3D TBP could not capture skin on the scalp, beneath clothing and on the soles of the feet, limiting complete assessment.

Conclusion

Clinical assessment of mSWAT using 3D TBP is as reliable as in-person mSWAT, suggesting its potential in teledermatology. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信