评价傅里叶变换拉曼光谱在花粉化学表征中的应用。

IF 2.2 3区 化学 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Florian Muthreich, Valeria Tafintseva, Boris Zimmermann, Achim Kohler, Carlos M Vila-Viçosa, Alistair W R Seddon
{"title":"评价傅里叶变换拉曼光谱在花粉化学表征中的应用。","authors":"Florian Muthreich, Valeria Tafintseva, Boris Zimmermann, Achim Kohler, Carlos M Vila-Viçosa, Alistair W R Seddon","doi":"10.1177/00037028251334405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vibrational spectroscopy is gaining popularity for understanding ecological and evolutionary patterns in plants, particularly in relation to the analysis of pollen grains. So far, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) has been the main approach used to classify pollen grains based on chemical variations. However, FT-IR may be less suitable for detecting differences in the pollen grain exine, mainly composed of sporopollenin. In contrast, Raman spectroscopy has increased sensitivity for the main chemical components found within sporopollenins. We compare the classification performance and chemical information provided by FT-IR and FT-Raman using a large dataset of <i>Quercus</i> L. pollen, comprising five species in three sections: (i) <i>Cerris</i>: <i>Q</i>. <i>suber</i>, (ii) <i>Ilex</i>: <i>Q. coccifera</i>, <i>Q. rotundifolia</i>, and (iii) <i>Quercus</i>: <i>Q. robur</i>, <i>Q. faginea</i>). Here, we used multiblock sparse partial least squares discriminant analyses (MB-sPLS-DA) analyses to directly compare the two infrared methods. Both FT-IR and FT-Raman successfully classified <i>Quercus</i> pollen to section level (100% accuracy). At the species level our models achieved ∼90% accuracy for FT-Raman and FT-IR separately and in the combined multiblock model. The multiblock results showed an increased number of sporopollenin peaks observed in FT-Raman spectra as compared to FT-IR. These peaks are also of a higher importance for classification. Results also showed differences in the types of vibrations that are of diagnostic value for the two infrared methods. CH<sub>2</sub> deformations are more important in FT-Raman, while C-O-C, C-O, and C = O stretches are more important for FT-IR-based identification of pollen. These vibrations are indicators of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. FT-Raman provides equally successful diagnostic potential to FT-IR, but uses more chemical information based on variations in sporopollenin chemistry than FT-IR. We suggest that the combined analysis of FT-IR and FT-Raman using multiblock analysis has great potential for classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":8253,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spectroscopy","volume":" ","pages":"37028251334405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Use of Fourier Transform Raman Spectroscopy for Pollen Chemical Characterization.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Muthreich, Valeria Tafintseva, Boris Zimmermann, Achim Kohler, Carlos M Vila-Viçosa, Alistair W R Seddon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00037028251334405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vibrational spectroscopy is gaining popularity for understanding ecological and evolutionary patterns in plants, particularly in relation to the analysis of pollen grains. So far, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) has been the main approach used to classify pollen grains based on chemical variations. However, FT-IR may be less suitable for detecting differences in the pollen grain exine, mainly composed of sporopollenin. In contrast, Raman spectroscopy has increased sensitivity for the main chemical components found within sporopollenins. We compare the classification performance and chemical information provided by FT-IR and FT-Raman using a large dataset of <i>Quercus</i> L. pollen, comprising five species in three sections: (i) <i>Cerris</i>: <i>Q</i>. <i>suber</i>, (ii) <i>Ilex</i>: <i>Q. coccifera</i>, <i>Q. rotundifolia</i>, and (iii) <i>Quercus</i>: <i>Q. robur</i>, <i>Q. faginea</i>). Here, we used multiblock sparse partial least squares discriminant analyses (MB-sPLS-DA) analyses to directly compare the two infrared methods. Both FT-IR and FT-Raman successfully classified <i>Quercus</i> pollen to section level (100% accuracy). At the species level our models achieved ∼90% accuracy for FT-Raman and FT-IR separately and in the combined multiblock model. The multiblock results showed an increased number of sporopollenin peaks observed in FT-Raman spectra as compared to FT-IR. These peaks are also of a higher importance for classification. Results also showed differences in the types of vibrations that are of diagnostic value for the two infrared methods. CH<sub>2</sub> deformations are more important in FT-Raman, while C-O-C, C-O, and C = O stretches are more important for FT-IR-based identification of pollen. These vibrations are indicators of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. FT-Raman provides equally successful diagnostic potential to FT-IR, but uses more chemical information based on variations in sporopollenin chemistry than FT-IR. We suggest that the combined analysis of FT-IR and FT-Raman using multiblock analysis has great potential for classification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Spectroscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37028251334405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Spectroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028251334405\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028251334405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

振动光谱学在了解植物的生态和进化模式方面越来越受欢迎,特别是在花粉粒分析方面。到目前为止,傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)是基于化学变化对花粉粒进行分类的主要方法。然而,FT-IR可能不太适合检测主要由孢粉组成的花粉粒外壁的差异。相比之下,拉曼光谱对孢粉蛋白中发现的主要化学成分的灵敏度提高了。本文以栎属栎属花粉为研究对象,比较了FT-IR和FT-Raman方法的分类性能和化学信息,其中栎属栎属栎属5种花粉分为3个部分:(i) Cerris: Q. suber, (ii) Ilex: Q. coccifera, Q. rotundifolia, (iii) Quercus: Q. robur, Q. faginea。本文采用多块稀疏偏最小二乘判别分析(MB-sPLS-DA)对两种红外方法进行了直接比较。FT-IR和FT-Raman均能将栎花粉分类到切片水平(准确率100%)。在物种水平上,我们的模型分别在FT-Raman和FT-IR以及联合多块模型中实现了约90%的准确率。多块结果表明,与FT-IR相比,FT-Raman光谱中观察到的孢粉素峰数量增加。这些峰对分类也很重要。结果还显示了振动类型的差异,这两种红外方法具有诊断价值。ft - ir鉴定花粉时,CH2变形更为重要,而C-O-C、C-O和C = O拉伸更为重要。这些振动是碳水化合物、蛋白质和脂质的指标。FT-Raman提供了与FT-IR同样成功的诊断潜力,但与FT-IR相比,它使用了更多基于孢粉化学变化的化学信息。我们认为FT-IR和FT-Raman结合使用多块分析具有很大的分类潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Use of Fourier Transform Raman Spectroscopy for Pollen Chemical Characterization.

Vibrational spectroscopy is gaining popularity for understanding ecological and evolutionary patterns in plants, particularly in relation to the analysis of pollen grains. So far, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) has been the main approach used to classify pollen grains based on chemical variations. However, FT-IR may be less suitable for detecting differences in the pollen grain exine, mainly composed of sporopollenin. In contrast, Raman spectroscopy has increased sensitivity for the main chemical components found within sporopollenins. We compare the classification performance and chemical information provided by FT-IR and FT-Raman using a large dataset of Quercus L. pollen, comprising five species in three sections: (i) Cerris: Q. suber, (ii) Ilex: Q. coccifera, Q. rotundifolia, and (iii) Quercus: Q. robur, Q. faginea). Here, we used multiblock sparse partial least squares discriminant analyses (MB-sPLS-DA) analyses to directly compare the two infrared methods. Both FT-IR and FT-Raman successfully classified Quercus pollen to section level (100% accuracy). At the species level our models achieved ∼90% accuracy for FT-Raman and FT-IR separately and in the combined multiblock model. The multiblock results showed an increased number of sporopollenin peaks observed in FT-Raman spectra as compared to FT-IR. These peaks are also of a higher importance for classification. Results also showed differences in the types of vibrations that are of diagnostic value for the two infrared methods. CH2 deformations are more important in FT-Raman, while C-O-C, C-O, and C = O stretches are more important for FT-IR-based identification of pollen. These vibrations are indicators of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. FT-Raman provides equally successful diagnostic potential to FT-IR, but uses more chemical information based on variations in sporopollenin chemistry than FT-IR. We suggest that the combined analysis of FT-IR and FT-Raman using multiblock analysis has great potential for classification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Spectroscopy
Applied Spectroscopy 工程技术-光谱学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Applied Spectroscopy is one of the world''s leading spectroscopy journals, publishing high-quality peer-reviewed articles, both fundamental and applied, covering all aspects of spectroscopy. Established in 1951, the journal is owned by the Society for Applied Spectroscopy and is published monthly. The journal is dedicated to fulfilling the mission of the Society to “…advance and disseminate knowledge and information concerning the art and science of spectroscopy and other allied sciences.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信