保护房客健康的法律起作用了吗?:可居住性和呼吸健康的隐含保证。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gabriel L Schwartz, Lela Chu
{"title":"保护房客健康的法律起作用了吗?:可居住性和呼吸健康的隐含保证。","authors":"Gabriel L Schwartz, Lela Chu","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Housing quality is a powerful determinant of health. When US renters' housing conditions deteriorate, state policies known as \"implied warranties of habitability\" are meant to force landlords to ameliorate pathogenic habitability violations, allowing renters to sue or withhold rent until repairs are completed. No research, however, has tested whether these policies work-whether they succeed at protecting population health. At issue is whether warranties are effective when bringing legal action is so onerous for renters in practice. We thus use generalized difference-in-differences models to estimate warranties' effects on renters' general and respiratory health, including event study and triple-difference models that employ homeowners as negative controls. Health outcome data from the National Health Interview Survey (1993-2018) was limited to the 10 states that did not have a warranty at baseline and had sufficient pre-implementation data. We found null associations near 0 for nearly all outcomes. It is unclear whether this is because (A) our sample mostly included states with weak policies, (B) US renters are not guaranteed lawyers in civil court, or (C) a completely different, more pro-active rental inspection approach is needed. Regardless, results suggest policies must change if we are to realize the public health promise of healthier housing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do laws protecting tenants' health work?: Implied warranties of habitability and respiratory health.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel L Schwartz, Lela Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwaf111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Housing quality is a powerful determinant of health. When US renters' housing conditions deteriorate, state policies known as \\\"implied warranties of habitability\\\" are meant to force landlords to ameliorate pathogenic habitability violations, allowing renters to sue or withhold rent until repairs are completed. No research, however, has tested whether these policies work-whether they succeed at protecting population health. At issue is whether warranties are effective when bringing legal action is so onerous for renters in practice. We thus use generalized difference-in-differences models to estimate warranties' effects on renters' general and respiratory health, including event study and triple-difference models that employ homeowners as negative controls. Health outcome data from the National Health Interview Survey (1993-2018) was limited to the 10 states that did not have a warranty at baseline and had sufficient pre-implementation data. We found null associations near 0 for nearly all outcomes. It is unclear whether this is because (A) our sample mostly included states with weak policies, (B) US renters are not guaranteed lawyers in civil court, or (C) a completely different, more pro-active rental inspection approach is needed. Regardless, results suggest policies must change if we are to realize the public health promise of healthier housing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住房质量是健康的重要决定因素。当美国租房者的住房条件恶化时,被称为“可居住性默示保证”的州政策旨在迫使房东改善致病的可居住性违规行为,允许租房者起诉或扣留租金,直到维修完成。然而,没有研究检验过这些政策是否有效——它们是否成功地保护了人口健康。问题在于,在实际操作中,对租房者来说,提起法律诉讼是如此繁重,因此担保是否有效。因此,我们使用广义差中差模型来估计担保对租房者一般健康和呼吸系统健康的影响,包括事件研究和采用房主作为负控制的三差模型。全国健康访谈调查(1993-2018)的健康结果数据仅限于基线时没有保证且有足够的实施前数据的10个州。我们发现几乎所有结果在0附近都没有关联。目前尚不清楚这是因为(A)我们的样本主要包括政策薄弱的州,(B)美国租房者不能保证在民事法庭上有律师,还是(C)需要一种完全不同的、更主动的租房检查方法。无论如何,结果表明,如果我们要实现更健康住房的公共卫生承诺,就必须改变政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do laws protecting tenants' health work?: Implied warranties of habitability and respiratory health.

Housing quality is a powerful determinant of health. When US renters' housing conditions deteriorate, state policies known as "implied warranties of habitability" are meant to force landlords to ameliorate pathogenic habitability violations, allowing renters to sue or withhold rent until repairs are completed. No research, however, has tested whether these policies work-whether they succeed at protecting population health. At issue is whether warranties are effective when bringing legal action is so onerous for renters in practice. We thus use generalized difference-in-differences models to estimate warranties' effects on renters' general and respiratory health, including event study and triple-difference models that employ homeowners as negative controls. Health outcome data from the National Health Interview Survey (1993-2018) was limited to the 10 states that did not have a warranty at baseline and had sufficient pre-implementation data. We found null associations near 0 for nearly all outcomes. It is unclear whether this is because (A) our sample mostly included states with weak policies, (B) US renters are not guaranteed lawyers in civil court, or (C) a completely different, more pro-active rental inspection approach is needed. Regardless, results suggest policies must change if we are to realize the public health promise of healthier housing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信