基于数据独立获取的血清和血浆定量蛋白质组学两两比较。

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Yan Li, Bing Wang, Fahan Ma, Jingwen Lyu, Daojian Xun, Tao Ji, Lingli Zhu, Subei Tan, Chen Ding
{"title":"基于数据独立获取的血清和血浆定量蛋白质组学两两比较。","authors":"Yan Li, Bing Wang, Fahan Ma, Jingwen Lyu, Daojian Xun, Tao Ji, Lingli Zhu, Subei Tan, Chen Ding","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human blood contains proteins secreted by various organs, but there is no consensus on whether serum or plasma is preferable for proteome studies. Mass spectrometry employing data-independent acquisition has emerged as a transformative methodology in proteomics, enabling reproducible large-scale quantification of proteomes during one LC-MS/MS analytical run and facilitating identification of potential markers and elucidation of biological processes. Here, we profiled the proteome data of ten paired plasma and serum samples in the initial sample set. Functional analysis revealed similarities and differences in biological functions and the preference for different organs between serum and plasma. Furthermore, comparative proteomic analysis highlighted the different proteomic characteristics. Plasma-overrepresented pathways were related to the phagosome and immune, while serum-overrepresented pathways were associated with amino acid metabolism, which were further validated by the follow-up sample set composed of eight paired plasma and serum samples. We have detected potential markers in plasma and serum for various cancers and explored their association with prognosis using data from the TCGA pan-cancer cohort and HPA database. Further assessment is required to validate the reproducibility of the quantification for these markers. Overall, this study highlights the commonality and specificity of plasma and serum at the molecular level, underscoring their respective utility in biological exploration and clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-Independent Acquisition-Based Quantitative Proteomics for Pairwise Comparison of Serum and Plasma.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Li, Bing Wang, Fahan Ma, Jingwen Lyu, Daojian Xun, Tao Ji, Lingli Zhu, Subei Tan, Chen Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human blood contains proteins secreted by various organs, but there is no consensus on whether serum or plasma is preferable for proteome studies. Mass spectrometry employing data-independent acquisition has emerged as a transformative methodology in proteomics, enabling reproducible large-scale quantification of proteomes during one LC-MS/MS analytical run and facilitating identification of potential markers and elucidation of biological processes. Here, we profiled the proteome data of ten paired plasma and serum samples in the initial sample set. Functional analysis revealed similarities and differences in biological functions and the preference for different organs between serum and plasma. Furthermore, comparative proteomic analysis highlighted the different proteomic characteristics. Plasma-overrepresented pathways were related to the phagosome and immune, while serum-overrepresented pathways were associated with amino acid metabolism, which were further validated by the follow-up sample set composed of eight paired plasma and serum samples. We have detected potential markers in plasma and serum for various cancers and explored their association with prognosis using data from the TCGA pan-cancer cohort and HPA database. Further assessment is required to validate the reproducibility of the quantification for these markers. Overall, this study highlights the commonality and specificity of plasma and serum at the molecular level, underscoring their respective utility in biological exploration and clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00783\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人体血液中含有各种器官分泌的蛋白质,但对于蛋白质组学研究究竟是血清还是血浆,目前还没有达成共识。采用数据独立采集的质谱法已经成为蛋白质组学的一种变革性方法,可以在一次LC-MS/MS分析过程中对蛋白质组进行可重复的大规模定量,并促进潜在标记物的鉴定和生物过程的阐明。在这里,我们分析了初始样本组中10对血浆和血清样本的蛋白质组数据。功能分析揭示了血清和血浆在生物学功能和对不同器官的偏好方面的异同。此外,比较蛋白质组学分析突出了不同蛋白质组学特征。血浆过度代表的途径与吞噬体和免疫有关,而血清过度代表的途径与氨基酸代谢有关,这一点通过由8个配对血浆和血清样本组成的后续样本集进一步验证。我们检测了血浆和血清中各种癌症的潜在标志物,并利用TCGA泛癌症队列和HPA数据库的数据探索了它们与预后的关系。需要进一步评估以验证这些标记物定量的可重复性。总之,本研究强调了血浆和血清在分子水平上的共性和特异性,强调了它们各自在生物学探索和临床应用中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data-Independent Acquisition-Based Quantitative Proteomics for Pairwise Comparison of Serum and Plasma.

Human blood contains proteins secreted by various organs, but there is no consensus on whether serum or plasma is preferable for proteome studies. Mass spectrometry employing data-independent acquisition has emerged as a transformative methodology in proteomics, enabling reproducible large-scale quantification of proteomes during one LC-MS/MS analytical run and facilitating identification of potential markers and elucidation of biological processes. Here, we profiled the proteome data of ten paired plasma and serum samples in the initial sample set. Functional analysis revealed similarities and differences in biological functions and the preference for different organs between serum and plasma. Furthermore, comparative proteomic analysis highlighted the different proteomic characteristics. Plasma-overrepresented pathways were related to the phagosome and immune, while serum-overrepresented pathways were associated with amino acid metabolism, which were further validated by the follow-up sample set composed of eight paired plasma and serum samples. We have detected potential markers in plasma and serum for various cancers and explored their association with prognosis using data from the TCGA pan-cancer cohort and HPA database. Further assessment is required to validate the reproducibility of the quantification for these markers. Overall, this study highlights the commonality and specificity of plasma and serum at the molecular level, underscoring their respective utility in biological exploration and clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信