非法工会活动?先打给你的律师,而不是警察

{"title":"非法工会活动?先打给你的律师,而不是警察","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/mare.31183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During certain instances of union activity, union organizers may appear to break the law. The common reaction of employers is to call the police. After all, if you saw someone you believed was breaking the law elsewhere, would that not be the expected response? When it comes to labor law, however, rushing to call for assistance from law enforcement can backfire. A recent decision in <i>Starbucks Corporation</i>, Case No. 03-CA-329453 (JD-29-25, April 3, 2025) is an illustrative example.</p>","PeriodicalId":100883,"journal":{"name":"Management Report for Nonunion Organizations","volume":"48 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illegal Union Activity? Call Your Lawyer First, Not the Cops\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mare.31183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>During certain instances of union activity, union organizers may appear to break the law. The common reaction of employers is to call the police. After all, if you saw someone you believed was breaking the law elsewhere, would that not be the expected response? When it comes to labor law, however, rushing to call for assistance from law enforcement can backfire. A recent decision in <i>Starbucks Corporation</i>, Case No. 03-CA-329453 (JD-29-25, April 3, 2025) is an illustrative example.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Report for Nonunion Organizations\",\"volume\":\"48 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Report for Nonunion Organizations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mare.31183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Report for Nonunion Organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mare.31183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在工会活动的某些情况下,工会组织者可能会违反法律。雇主的普遍反应是报警。毕竟,如果你在其他地方看到你认为触犯了法律的人,这难道不是预期的反应吗?然而,当涉及到劳动法时,急于寻求执法部门的帮助可能会适得其反。最近对星巴克公司的判决就是一个很好的例子,案件编号03-CA-329453 (JD-29-25, 2025年4月3日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Illegal Union Activity? Call Your Lawyer First, Not the Cops

During certain instances of union activity, union organizers may appear to break the law. The common reaction of employers is to call the police. After all, if you saw someone you believed was breaking the law elsewhere, would that not be the expected response? When it comes to labor law, however, rushing to call for assistance from law enforcement can backfire. A recent decision in Starbucks Corporation, Case No. 03-CA-329453 (JD-29-25, April 3, 2025) is an illustrative example.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信