{"title":"竹秸秆作为污水反硝化绿色廉价碳源的研究","authors":"Xiaobing Hu, Xiaoyu Chen, Kaihao Zhai, Weiwei Song, Chaowei Liu, Yue Gao","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-08135-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To address the issue of insufficient carbon sources in biological heterotrophic denitrification and to provide a green and low-cost alternative, this study investigated the feasibility of using bamboo stalks as a carbon source. Five types of bamboo stalks—<i>Phyllostachys pubescens</i> (Pp), <i>Phyllostachys sulphurea</i> (Ps), <i>Phyllostachys nigra</i> (Pn), <i>Dendrocalamus membranaceus</i> Munro (Dm), and <i>Bambusa glaucescens</i> (Bg)—were collected from eastern China. Their carbon release capacities and denitrification potentials were systematically evaluated. The results showed that bamboo contains higher integrated cellulose (59.06%) in bamboo stalks, which is much higher than lignin content (30.88%). A higher integrated cellulose as carbon sources in the initial stage of denitrification can promote the nitrate’s removal. Among the tested bamboo species, <i>Pn</i> and <i>Bg</i> exhibited the highest carbon release rates, at 1.57 ± 0.83 COD·mg·(g·d)<sup>−1</sup> and 1.05 ± 0.13 COD·mg·(g·d)<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, which corresponded to effective nitrate removal performance. When the effluent NO₃⁻-N concentration was 15 mg·L⁻<sup>1</sup>, their nitrate removal rates reached 71.53% ± 19.36 and 79.20 ± 21.49%, respectively. However, <i>Pn</i> showed higher nitrogen and phosphorus release (cumulative TN: 1.27 mg·g⁻<sup>1</sup>; cumulative TP: 0.048 mg·g⁻<sup>1</sup>), along with an elevated COD concentration (63.10 ± 77.86 mg·L⁻<sup>1</sup>) in the effluent after denitrification. Therefore, <i>Bg</i> was identified as the most suitable carbon source for biological denitrification due to its balanced performance and lower pollutant release.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on Bamboo Stalks as Green and Low-Priced Carbon Sources for Wastewater Denitrification\",\"authors\":\"Xiaobing Hu, Xiaoyu Chen, Kaihao Zhai, Weiwei Song, Chaowei Liu, Yue Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-025-08135-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To address the issue of insufficient carbon sources in biological heterotrophic denitrification and to provide a green and low-cost alternative, this study investigated the feasibility of using bamboo stalks as a carbon source. Five types of bamboo stalks—<i>Phyllostachys pubescens</i> (Pp), <i>Phyllostachys sulphurea</i> (Ps), <i>Phyllostachys nigra</i> (Pn), <i>Dendrocalamus membranaceus</i> Munro (Dm), and <i>Bambusa glaucescens</i> (Bg)—were collected from eastern China. Their carbon release capacities and denitrification potentials were systematically evaluated. The results showed that bamboo contains higher integrated cellulose (59.06%) in bamboo stalks, which is much higher than lignin content (30.88%). A higher integrated cellulose as carbon sources in the initial stage of denitrification can promote the nitrate’s removal. Among the tested bamboo species, <i>Pn</i> and <i>Bg</i> exhibited the highest carbon release rates, at 1.57 ± 0.83 COD·mg·(g·d)<sup>−1</sup> and 1.05 ± 0.13 COD·mg·(g·d)<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, which corresponded to effective nitrate removal performance. When the effluent NO₃⁻-N concentration was 15 mg·L⁻<sup>1</sup>, their nitrate removal rates reached 71.53% ± 19.36 and 79.20 ± 21.49%, respectively. However, <i>Pn</i> showed higher nitrogen and phosphorus release (cumulative TN: 1.27 mg·g⁻<sup>1</sup>; cumulative TP: 0.048 mg·g⁻<sup>1</sup>), along with an elevated COD concentration (63.10 ± 77.86 mg·L⁻<sup>1</sup>) in the effluent after denitrification. Therefore, <i>Bg</i> was identified as the most suitable carbon source for biological denitrification due to its balanced performance and lower pollutant release.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"236 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-08135-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-08135-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Study on Bamboo Stalks as Green and Low-Priced Carbon Sources for Wastewater Denitrification
To address the issue of insufficient carbon sources in biological heterotrophic denitrification and to provide a green and low-cost alternative, this study investigated the feasibility of using bamboo stalks as a carbon source. Five types of bamboo stalks—Phyllostachys pubescens (Pp), Phyllostachys sulphurea (Ps), Phyllostachys nigra (Pn), Dendrocalamus membranaceus Munro (Dm), and Bambusa glaucescens (Bg)—were collected from eastern China. Their carbon release capacities and denitrification potentials were systematically evaluated. The results showed that bamboo contains higher integrated cellulose (59.06%) in bamboo stalks, which is much higher than lignin content (30.88%). A higher integrated cellulose as carbon sources in the initial stage of denitrification can promote the nitrate’s removal. Among the tested bamboo species, Pn and Bg exhibited the highest carbon release rates, at 1.57 ± 0.83 COD·mg·(g·d)−1 and 1.05 ± 0.13 COD·mg·(g·d)−1, respectively, which corresponded to effective nitrate removal performance. When the effluent NO₃⁻-N concentration was 15 mg·L⁻1, their nitrate removal rates reached 71.53% ± 19.36 and 79.20 ± 21.49%, respectively. However, Pn showed higher nitrogen and phosphorus release (cumulative TN: 1.27 mg·g⁻1; cumulative TP: 0.048 mg·g⁻1), along with an elevated COD concentration (63.10 ± 77.86 mg·L⁻1) in the effluent after denitrification. Therefore, Bg was identified as the most suitable carbon source for biological denitrification due to its balanced performance and lower pollutant release.
期刊介绍:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments.
Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation.
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.