Fatemeh Kardani, Aniseh Zarei Jelyani, Tahere Khezeli, Mohammad Hashemi, Marzieh Rashedinia, Saeedeh Shariati, Masoud Mahdavinia, Seyyed Mohammad Ali Noorie
{"title":"基于单片分子印迹聚合物纤维固相微萃取和常规quechers法测定食用油样品中229种农药残留及GC-MS分析","authors":"Fatemeh Kardani, Aniseh Zarei Jelyani, Tahere Khezeli, Mohammad Hashemi, Marzieh Rashedinia, Saeedeh Shariati, Masoud Mahdavinia, Seyyed Mohammad Ali Noorie","doi":"10.1186/s13065-025-01518-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this research is the development of a solid phase microextraction based on monolithic molecularly imprinted polymer fiber (SPME-MMIPF) method to determine 229 pesticides in edible oil samples using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and comparison of it with the common QuEChERS method. For SPME-MMIPF method, an MMIPF was synthesized by polymerization of methacrylic acid in presence of ethylene glycoldimethacrylate and azo (bis)-isobutyronitrile. The optimal conditions for the SPME-MMIPF method are: extraction time 30 min, desorption time with toluene 20 min and string speed of the aqueous sample 600 rpm. Under optimal extraction condition, the figures of merit were obtained for two methods and compared. The linear range of 1–300 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup> for SPME-MMIPF and 10–250 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup> for QuEChERS was obtained. The detection limits of SPME-MMIPF (0.300–0.335 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup>) method was better than the QuEChERS (0.9–2.8 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup>) method. The results showed a quantification limit of 0.990–1.102 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup> for SPME-MMIPF and 3.0–9.2 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup> for QuEChERS. The recoveries were in the range of 92–102% and 68–127% for SPME-MMIPF and QuEChERS, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":496,"journal":{"name":"BMC Chemistry","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13065-025-01518-x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of 229 pesticides residue in edible oil samples using conventional quechers method and solid phase microextraction based on monolithic molecularly imprinted polymer fiber and analysis with GC-MS\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Kardani, Aniseh Zarei Jelyani, Tahere Khezeli, Mohammad Hashemi, Marzieh Rashedinia, Saeedeh Shariati, Masoud Mahdavinia, Seyyed Mohammad Ali Noorie\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13065-025-01518-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The goal of this research is the development of a solid phase microextraction based on monolithic molecularly imprinted polymer fiber (SPME-MMIPF) method to determine 229 pesticides in edible oil samples using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and comparison of it with the common QuEChERS method. For SPME-MMIPF method, an MMIPF was synthesized by polymerization of methacrylic acid in presence of ethylene glycoldimethacrylate and azo (bis)-isobutyronitrile. The optimal conditions for the SPME-MMIPF method are: extraction time 30 min, desorption time with toluene 20 min and string speed of the aqueous sample 600 rpm. Under optimal extraction condition, the figures of merit were obtained for two methods and compared. The linear range of 1–300 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup> for SPME-MMIPF and 10–250 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup> for QuEChERS was obtained. The detection limits of SPME-MMIPF (0.300–0.335 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup>) method was better than the QuEChERS (0.9–2.8 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup>) method. The results showed a quantification limit of 0.990–1.102 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup> for SPME-MMIPF and 3.0–9.2 µg kg<sup>− 1</sup> for QuEChERS. The recoveries were in the range of 92–102% and 68–127% for SPME-MMIPF and QuEChERS, respectively.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13065-025-01518-x\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-025-01518-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-025-01518-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是建立基于单片分子印迹聚合物纤维(SPME-MMIPF)的固相微萃取方法,利用气相色谱-质谱联用技术(GC-MS)测定食用油样品中的229种农药,并与常用的QuEChERS方法进行比较。采用SPME-MMIPF方法,以甲基丙烯酸为原料,在乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯和偶氮(双)-异丁腈的存在下聚合合成了MMIPF。SPME-MMIPF法的最佳工艺条件为:萃取时间30 min,甲苯解吸时间20 min,水样串速600 rpm。在最佳提取条件下,对两种提取方法的优值进行了比较。SPME-MMIPF的线性范围为1 ~ 300µg kg - 1, QuEChERS的线性范围为10 ~ 250µg kg - 1。SPME-MMIPF法的检出限(0.300 ~ 0.335µg kg−1)优于QuEChERS法(0.9 ~ 2.8µg kg−1)。结果表明,SPME-MMIPF的定量限为0.990 ~ 1.102µg kg - 1, QuEChERS的定量限为3.0 ~ 9.2µg kg - 1。SPME-MMIPF加样回收率为92 ~ 102%,QuEChERS加样回收率为68 ~ 127%。
Determination of 229 pesticides residue in edible oil samples using conventional quechers method and solid phase microextraction based on monolithic molecularly imprinted polymer fiber and analysis with GC-MS
The goal of this research is the development of a solid phase microextraction based on monolithic molecularly imprinted polymer fiber (SPME-MMIPF) method to determine 229 pesticides in edible oil samples using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and comparison of it with the common QuEChERS method. For SPME-MMIPF method, an MMIPF was synthesized by polymerization of methacrylic acid in presence of ethylene glycoldimethacrylate and azo (bis)-isobutyronitrile. The optimal conditions for the SPME-MMIPF method are: extraction time 30 min, desorption time with toluene 20 min and string speed of the aqueous sample 600 rpm. Under optimal extraction condition, the figures of merit were obtained for two methods and compared. The linear range of 1–300 µg kg− 1 for SPME-MMIPF and 10–250 µg kg− 1 for QuEChERS was obtained. The detection limits of SPME-MMIPF (0.300–0.335 µg kg− 1) method was better than the QuEChERS (0.9–2.8 µg kg− 1) method. The results showed a quantification limit of 0.990–1.102 µg kg− 1 for SPME-MMIPF and 3.0–9.2 µg kg− 1 for QuEChERS. The recoveries were in the range of 92–102% and 68–127% for SPME-MMIPF and QuEChERS, respectively.
期刊介绍:
BMC Chemistry, formerly known as Chemistry Central Journal, is now part of the BMC series journals family.
Chemistry Central Journal has served the chemistry community as a trusted open access resource for more than 10 years – and we are delighted to announce the next step on its journey. In January 2019 the journal has been renamed BMC Chemistry and now strengthens the BMC series footprint in the physical sciences by publishing quality articles and by pushing the boundaries of open chemistry.