在文丘里系统中使用高效臭氧预处理增强木质纤维素废物的水解:自由和过滤器模型的比较

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD
Barak Halpern, Asaf Pras, Manohara Halanur, Yoram Gerchman, Hadas Mamane
{"title":"在文丘里系统中使用高效臭氧预处理增强木质纤维素废物的水解:自由和过滤器模型的比较","authors":"Barak Halpern,&nbsp;Asaf Pras,&nbsp;Manohara Halanur,&nbsp;Yoram Gerchman,&nbsp;Hadas Mamane","doi":"10.1007/s10570-025-06536-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates ozone pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic waste, a potentially more sustainable alternative for bioethanol, biogas, and bioplastics production. Traditional methods are often energy-intensive and generate pollutants, limiting large-scale applications. We tested two pretreatment methods using cardboard as a model. The ozone was applied using a venturi system in two settings: the ‘Strainer model’, where ground cardboard is enclosed in a mesh strainer, and the ‘Free model’, where the cardboard circulates freely in the reactor. The ‘Free model’ showed 100% ozone consumption, significantly higher than the 70% in the ‘Strainer model’, indicating better ozone accessibility and reactivity, and eliminating the need for ozone stripping in the off-gas, offering safety and cost benefits. Thermogravimetric and chemical analysis showed that the ‘Free model’ reduced lignin and impurities and increase holocellulose in the biomass, while increasing the streaming potential. This pretreatment significantly enhanced hydrolysis efficiency, achieving a 65% sugar yield, approaching the manufacturer’s theoretical maximum of the enzyme. In comparison, the ‘Strainer model’ and untreated samples yielded 40% and 43%, respectively. These results were corroborated by XRD and FTIR analysis. The increased surface area and direct ozone contact in the ‘Free model’ are key mechanisms driving these improvements. These findings suggest that the ‘Free model’ has the potential to serve as a more sustainable pretreatment method; however, further evaluation is needed, particularly in comparison to industrial-scale alternatives and their energy consumption, to fully assess its environmental impact.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":511,"journal":{"name":"Cellulose","volume":"32 7","pages":"4213 - 4233"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10570-025-06536-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced hydrolysis of lignocellulosic waste using highly efficient ozone pretreatment in a venturi system: a comparison of free and strainer models\",\"authors\":\"Barak Halpern,&nbsp;Asaf Pras,&nbsp;Manohara Halanur,&nbsp;Yoram Gerchman,&nbsp;Hadas Mamane\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10570-025-06536-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates ozone pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic waste, a potentially more sustainable alternative for bioethanol, biogas, and bioplastics production. Traditional methods are often energy-intensive and generate pollutants, limiting large-scale applications. We tested two pretreatment methods using cardboard as a model. The ozone was applied using a venturi system in two settings: the ‘Strainer model’, where ground cardboard is enclosed in a mesh strainer, and the ‘Free model’, where the cardboard circulates freely in the reactor. The ‘Free model’ showed 100% ozone consumption, significantly higher than the 70% in the ‘Strainer model’, indicating better ozone accessibility and reactivity, and eliminating the need for ozone stripping in the off-gas, offering safety and cost benefits. Thermogravimetric and chemical analysis showed that the ‘Free model’ reduced lignin and impurities and increase holocellulose in the biomass, while increasing the streaming potential. This pretreatment significantly enhanced hydrolysis efficiency, achieving a 65% sugar yield, approaching the manufacturer’s theoretical maximum of the enzyme. In comparison, the ‘Strainer model’ and untreated samples yielded 40% and 43%, respectively. These results were corroborated by XRD and FTIR analysis. The increased surface area and direct ozone contact in the ‘Free model’ are key mechanisms driving these improvements. These findings suggest that the ‘Free model’ has the potential to serve as a more sustainable pretreatment method; however, further evaluation is needed, particularly in comparison to industrial-scale alternatives and their energy consumption, to fully assess its environmental impact.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellulose\",\"volume\":\"32 7\",\"pages\":\"4213 - 4233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10570-025-06536-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellulose\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-025-06536-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellulose","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-025-06536-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了木质纤维素废料的臭氧预处理工艺,木质纤维素废料是生物乙醇、沼气和生物塑料生产的潜在更可持续的替代品。传统的方法往往是能源密集型的,并产生污染物,限制了大规模应用。我们以纸板为模型,测试了两种预处理方法。在两种情况下使用文丘里系统应用臭氧:“过滤器模型”,其中研磨纸板被封闭在网状过滤器中,以及“自由模型”,其中纸板在反应器中自由循环。“自由模式”显示100%的臭氧消耗,明显高于“过滤模式”的70%,表明更好的臭氧可及性和反应性,并且无需在废气中剥离臭氧,提供安全和成本效益。热重分析和化学分析表明,“自由模式”降低了生物质中的木质素和杂质,增加了生物质中的全息纤维素,同时增加了流动电位。这种预处理显著提高了水解效率,达到65%的糖产量,接近制造商的理论最大值。相比之下,“过滤器模型”和未经处理的样品分别产生了40%和43%。XRD和FTIR分析证实了上述结果。“自由模型”中增加的表面积和直接接触臭氧是推动这些改进的关键机制。这些发现表明,“免费模型”有可能作为一种更可持续的预处理方法;但是,需要进一步评价,特别是与工业规模的替代办法及其能源消耗进行比较,以充分评价其对环境的影响。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced hydrolysis of lignocellulosic waste using highly efficient ozone pretreatment in a venturi system: a comparison of free and strainer models

This study investigates ozone pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic waste, a potentially more sustainable alternative for bioethanol, biogas, and bioplastics production. Traditional methods are often energy-intensive and generate pollutants, limiting large-scale applications. We tested two pretreatment methods using cardboard as a model. The ozone was applied using a venturi system in two settings: the ‘Strainer model’, where ground cardboard is enclosed in a mesh strainer, and the ‘Free model’, where the cardboard circulates freely in the reactor. The ‘Free model’ showed 100% ozone consumption, significantly higher than the 70% in the ‘Strainer model’, indicating better ozone accessibility and reactivity, and eliminating the need for ozone stripping in the off-gas, offering safety and cost benefits. Thermogravimetric and chemical analysis showed that the ‘Free model’ reduced lignin and impurities and increase holocellulose in the biomass, while increasing the streaming potential. This pretreatment significantly enhanced hydrolysis efficiency, achieving a 65% sugar yield, approaching the manufacturer’s theoretical maximum of the enzyme. In comparison, the ‘Strainer model’ and untreated samples yielded 40% and 43%, respectively. These results were corroborated by XRD and FTIR analysis. The increased surface area and direct ozone contact in the ‘Free model’ are key mechanisms driving these improvements. These findings suggest that the ‘Free model’ has the potential to serve as a more sustainable pretreatment method; however, further evaluation is needed, particularly in comparison to industrial-scale alternatives and their energy consumption, to fully assess its environmental impact.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cellulose
Cellulose 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
580
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cellulose is an international journal devoted to the dissemination of research and scientific and technological progress in the field of cellulose and related naturally occurring polymers. The journal is concerned with the pure and applied science of cellulose and related materials, and also with the development of relevant new technologies. This includes the chemistry, biochemistry, physics and materials science of cellulose and its sources, including wood and other biomass resources, and their derivatives. Coverage extends to the conversion of these polymers and resources into manufactured goods, such as pulp, paper, textiles, and manufactured as well natural fibers, and to the chemistry of materials used in their processing. Cellulose publishes review articles, research papers, and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信