棉花和棉混纺废物增值的可持续战略:循环经济之路

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD
Tarun Grover, Lijing Wang, Rajkishore Nayak, Rajiv Padhye, Asimananda Khandual
{"title":"棉花和棉混纺废物增值的可持续战略:循环经济之路","authors":"Tarun Grover,&nbsp;Lijing Wang,&nbsp;Rajkishore Nayak,&nbsp;Rajiv Padhye,&nbsp;Asimananda Khandual","doi":"10.1007/s10570-025-06524-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research explores the comparative efficacy of mechanical, chemical, and biological recycling methods for cotton and cotton-based blends, focusing on their processes, challenges, and implications for sustainability. Through detailed analyses of extant literature, this study identified mechanical recycling as a widely implemented method due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness but notes its limitations, such as fiber degradation, inappropriate for some fibers, and contamination from mixed materials. Chemical recycling is an effective method for recovering fibers that are unsuitable for mechanical recycling, offering high recovery rates and preventing waste being landfilled. Despite its potential, this approach faces challenges such as high energy requirements, financial constraints, and reliance on harsh chemicals. In contrast, biological recycling is emerging as an ecofriendly alternative with the potential to use enzymes for targeted degradation; however, it requires further advancements in enzyme specificity and process scalability. This review emphasizes the need for hybrid models combining these methods to address their individual limitations, such as integrating technological sorting for mechanical recycling or developing non-toxic green solvents for chemical recycling. Furthermore, Life Cycle Assessment comparisons reveal the environmental and financial benefits of optimizing these methods for industrial application, with implications for policymakers and industry stakeholders. By advancing these recycling technologies and aligning sustainable development goals, the cotton textile industry can significantly reduce waste, conserve resources, and foster sustainable practices in waste valorization.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":511,"journal":{"name":"Cellulose","volume":"32 7","pages":"4077 - 4100"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10570-025-06524-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable strategies for the valorization of cotton and cotton blended waste: pathways to circular economy\",\"authors\":\"Tarun Grover,&nbsp;Lijing Wang,&nbsp;Rajkishore Nayak,&nbsp;Rajiv Padhye,&nbsp;Asimananda Khandual\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10570-025-06524-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research explores the comparative efficacy of mechanical, chemical, and biological recycling methods for cotton and cotton-based blends, focusing on their processes, challenges, and implications for sustainability. Through detailed analyses of extant literature, this study identified mechanical recycling as a widely implemented method due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness but notes its limitations, such as fiber degradation, inappropriate for some fibers, and contamination from mixed materials. Chemical recycling is an effective method for recovering fibers that are unsuitable for mechanical recycling, offering high recovery rates and preventing waste being landfilled. Despite its potential, this approach faces challenges such as high energy requirements, financial constraints, and reliance on harsh chemicals. In contrast, biological recycling is emerging as an ecofriendly alternative with the potential to use enzymes for targeted degradation; however, it requires further advancements in enzyme specificity and process scalability. This review emphasizes the need for hybrid models combining these methods to address their individual limitations, such as integrating technological sorting for mechanical recycling or developing non-toxic green solvents for chemical recycling. Furthermore, Life Cycle Assessment comparisons reveal the environmental and financial benefits of optimizing these methods for industrial application, with implications for policymakers and industry stakeholders. By advancing these recycling technologies and aligning sustainable development goals, the cotton textile industry can significantly reduce waste, conserve resources, and foster sustainable practices in waste valorization.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellulose\",\"volume\":\"32 7\",\"pages\":\"4077 - 4100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10570-025-06524-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellulose\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-025-06524-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellulose","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-025-06524-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了机械、化学和生物回收方法对棉花和棉基混纺的比较功效,重点是它们的过程、挑战和对可持续性的影响。通过对现有文献的详细分析,本研究确定了机械回收作为一种广泛实施的方法,由于其简单和成本效益,但注意到其局限性,如纤维降解,不适合某些纤维,以及混合材料的污染。化学回收是回收不适合机械回收的纤维的有效方法,具有高回收率和防止垃圾填埋的优点。尽管具有潜力,但这种方法面临着诸如高能耗、资金限制和对刺激性化学品的依赖等挑战。相比之下,生物回收正在成为一种生态友好的替代方案,具有使用酶进行目标降解的潜力;然而,它需要进一步提高酶的特异性和工艺的可扩展性。这篇综述强调需要将这些方法结合起来的混合模型来解决它们各自的局限性,例如集成机械回收的技术分类或开发用于化学回收的无毒绿色溶剂。此外,生命周期评估比较揭示了优化这些方法用于工业应用的环境和财务效益,对政策制定者和行业利益相关者具有重要意义。通过推进这些回收技术和协调可持续发展目标,棉纺织行业可以显著减少浪费,节约资源,并促进废物增值的可持续实践。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainable strategies for the valorization of cotton and cotton blended waste: pathways to circular economy

This research explores the comparative efficacy of mechanical, chemical, and biological recycling methods for cotton and cotton-based blends, focusing on their processes, challenges, and implications for sustainability. Through detailed analyses of extant literature, this study identified mechanical recycling as a widely implemented method due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness but notes its limitations, such as fiber degradation, inappropriate for some fibers, and contamination from mixed materials. Chemical recycling is an effective method for recovering fibers that are unsuitable for mechanical recycling, offering high recovery rates and preventing waste being landfilled. Despite its potential, this approach faces challenges such as high energy requirements, financial constraints, and reliance on harsh chemicals. In contrast, biological recycling is emerging as an ecofriendly alternative with the potential to use enzymes for targeted degradation; however, it requires further advancements in enzyme specificity and process scalability. This review emphasizes the need for hybrid models combining these methods to address their individual limitations, such as integrating technological sorting for mechanical recycling or developing non-toxic green solvents for chemical recycling. Furthermore, Life Cycle Assessment comparisons reveal the environmental and financial benefits of optimizing these methods for industrial application, with implications for policymakers and industry stakeholders. By advancing these recycling technologies and aligning sustainable development goals, the cotton textile industry can significantly reduce waste, conserve resources, and foster sustainable practices in waste valorization.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cellulose
Cellulose 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
580
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cellulose is an international journal devoted to the dissemination of research and scientific and technological progress in the field of cellulose and related naturally occurring polymers. The journal is concerned with the pure and applied science of cellulose and related materials, and also with the development of relevant new technologies. This includes the chemistry, biochemistry, physics and materials science of cellulose and its sources, including wood and other biomass resources, and their derivatives. Coverage extends to the conversion of these polymers and resources into manufactured goods, such as pulp, paper, textiles, and manufactured as well natural fibers, and to the chemistry of materials used in their processing. Cellulose publishes review articles, research papers, and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信