{"title":"治疗真菌性尿路疾病在狗和猫:一个范围审查","authors":"J. Scott Weese , Heather E. Weese","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fungal urinary tract disease has been poorly studied in veterinary medicine. While it is an uncommon condition, identification of fungal cystitis or pyelonephritis raises many clinical questions about optimal management practices. To better understand optimal management approaches and inform guideline development, a scoping review was to identify available evidence pertaining to treatment of fungal urinary tract disease in dogs and cats. After de-duplication and relevance screening, 28 studies were included in the synthesis). Twenty-six (93 %) were single case reports and 2 (7.1 %) were case series' describing fungal infections in 16 (62 %) dogs and 10 (38 %) cats. Antifungal treatment of cystitis, pyelonephritis, funguria and fungal balls was described, with variable drugs and regimens. Varied treatment approaches and outcomes have been reported, but controlled trials are lacking. In lieu of that, larger and more structured multicentre observational studies are needed to better understand treatment approaches and inform evidence-based guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 105710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of fungal urinary tract disease in dogs and cats: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"J. Scott Weese , Heather E. Weese\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fungal urinary tract disease has been poorly studied in veterinary medicine. While it is an uncommon condition, identification of fungal cystitis or pyelonephritis raises many clinical questions about optimal management practices. To better understand optimal management approaches and inform guideline development, a scoping review was to identify available evidence pertaining to treatment of fungal urinary tract disease in dogs and cats. After de-duplication and relevance screening, 28 studies were included in the synthesis). Twenty-six (93 %) were single case reports and 2 (7.1 %) were case series' describing fungal infections in 16 (62 %) dogs and 10 (38 %) cats. Antifungal treatment of cystitis, pyelonephritis, funguria and fungal balls was described, with variable drugs and regimens. Varied treatment approaches and outcomes have been reported, but controlled trials are lacking. In lieu of that, larger and more structured multicentre observational studies are needed to better understand treatment approaches and inform evidence-based guidelines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825001845\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825001845","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment of fungal urinary tract disease in dogs and cats: a scoping review
Fungal urinary tract disease has been poorly studied in veterinary medicine. While it is an uncommon condition, identification of fungal cystitis or pyelonephritis raises many clinical questions about optimal management practices. To better understand optimal management approaches and inform guideline development, a scoping review was to identify available evidence pertaining to treatment of fungal urinary tract disease in dogs and cats. After de-duplication and relevance screening, 28 studies were included in the synthesis). Twenty-six (93 %) were single case reports and 2 (7.1 %) were case series' describing fungal infections in 16 (62 %) dogs and 10 (38 %) cats. Antifungal treatment of cystitis, pyelonephritis, funguria and fungal balls was described, with variable drugs and regimens. Varied treatment approaches and outcomes have been reported, but controlled trials are lacking. In lieu of that, larger and more structured multicentre observational studies are needed to better understand treatment approaches and inform evidence-based guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.