探讨生物经济中的社会接受度:范围回顾与未来研究方向

Mina Sadeghzadeh , Maeve Henchion , Eoin O'Neill
{"title":"探讨生物经济中的社会接受度:范围回顾与未来研究方向","authors":"Mina Sadeghzadeh ,&nbsp;Maeve Henchion ,&nbsp;Eoin O'Neill","doi":"10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The bioeconomy has gained importance over the last decade and is presented as a solution to multiple societal challenges. However, its success relies on broad social acceptance, making it essential to understand stakeholders’ perspectives to develop innovations that address societal needs. This scoping review synthesises existing literature regarding social acceptance of the bioeconomy, including associated technologies, infrastructure and applications to provide insights into stakeholders’ decision-making process and influencing factors. Following Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) methodological framework, this scoping review identified, selected, organised, and summarised 105 academic articles on bioeconomy acceptance across stakeholders. The findings indicate a strong geographical bias, with a concentration of studies in countries, such as the USA, Germany, and China, with countries in Eastern Europe underrepresented. The review also reveals the limited inclusion of some perspectives in the discourse. While a considerable body of research has been conducted on farmers, consumers, and the public, research on policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers themselves is less prevalent. Interestingly, studies on farmers mainly focus on their views on certain applications, i.e. as passive recipients of (potential) applications, rather than how they can actively participate in shaping the bioeconomy. Noting a reliance on survey methods, shifting to more participatory research methods could enhance stakeholder engagement. Furthermore, the conceptualisation of acceptance in the literature is predominantly passive to date, focusing on attitudes and perceptions, often in relation to concepts rather than tangible or real objects. As bioeconomy innovations become more common, research will need to shift towards understanding active acceptance, how people engage with and adopt these innovations in their everyday lives. This shift will be critical for building a bioeconomy that is sustainable, just and inclusive.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100250,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring social acceptance in the bioeconomy: A scoping review and future research directions\",\"authors\":\"Mina Sadeghzadeh ,&nbsp;Maeve Henchion ,&nbsp;Eoin O'Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The bioeconomy has gained importance over the last decade and is presented as a solution to multiple societal challenges. However, its success relies on broad social acceptance, making it essential to understand stakeholders’ perspectives to develop innovations that address societal needs. This scoping review synthesises existing literature regarding social acceptance of the bioeconomy, including associated technologies, infrastructure and applications to provide insights into stakeholders’ decision-making process and influencing factors. Following Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) methodological framework, this scoping review identified, selected, organised, and summarised 105 academic articles on bioeconomy acceptance across stakeholders. The findings indicate a strong geographical bias, with a concentration of studies in countries, such as the USA, Germany, and China, with countries in Eastern Europe underrepresented. The review also reveals the limited inclusion of some perspectives in the discourse. While a considerable body of research has been conducted on farmers, consumers, and the public, research on policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers themselves is less prevalent. Interestingly, studies on farmers mainly focus on their views on certain applications, i.e. as passive recipients of (potential) applications, rather than how they can actively participate in shaping the bioeconomy. Noting a reliance on survey methods, shifting to more participatory research methods could enhance stakeholder engagement. Furthermore, the conceptualisation of acceptance in the literature is predominantly passive to date, focusing on attitudes and perceptions, often in relation to concepts rather than tangible or real objects. As bioeconomy innovations become more common, research will need to shift towards understanding active acceptance, how people engage with and adopt these innovations in their everyday lives. This shift will be critical for building a bioeconomy that is sustainable, just and inclusive.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772801325000247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772801325000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物经济在过去十年中变得越来越重要,并被视为解决多种社会挑战的解决方案。然而,它的成功依赖于广泛的社会接受,因此了解利益相关者的观点对于开发满足社会需求的创新至关重要。本综述综合了有关生物经济的社会接受度的现有文献,包括相关技术、基础设施和应用,以提供对利益相关者决策过程和影响因素的见解。按照Arksey和O’malley(2005)的方法框架,这一范围审查确定、选择、组织和总结了105篇关于利益相关者接受生物经济的学术文章。研究结果显示了强烈的地理偏差,研究集中在美国、德国和中国等国家,而东欧国家的代表性不足。回顾还揭示了话语中一些观点的有限包含。虽然对农民、消费者和公众进行了相当多的研究,但对政策制定者、行业领袖和研究人员本身的研究却不那么普遍。有趣的是,对农民的研究主要集中在他们对某些应用的看法上,即作为(潜在)应用的被动接受者,而不是他们如何积极参与塑造生物经济。注意到对调查方法的依赖,转向更具参与性的研究方法可以加强利益相关者的参与。此外,迄今为止,文献中对接受的概念化主要是被动的,关注于态度和看法,通常与概念而不是有形或真实的物体有关。随着生物经济创新变得越来越普遍,研究将需要转向理解主动接受,人们如何在日常生活中参与和采用这些创新。这一转变对于建设可持续、公正和包容的生物经济至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring social acceptance in the bioeconomy: A scoping review and future research directions

Exploring social acceptance in the bioeconomy: A scoping review and future research directions
The bioeconomy has gained importance over the last decade and is presented as a solution to multiple societal challenges. However, its success relies on broad social acceptance, making it essential to understand stakeholders’ perspectives to develop innovations that address societal needs. This scoping review synthesises existing literature regarding social acceptance of the bioeconomy, including associated technologies, infrastructure and applications to provide insights into stakeholders’ decision-making process and influencing factors. Following Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) methodological framework, this scoping review identified, selected, organised, and summarised 105 academic articles on bioeconomy acceptance across stakeholders. The findings indicate a strong geographical bias, with a concentration of studies in countries, such as the USA, Germany, and China, with countries in Eastern Europe underrepresented. The review also reveals the limited inclusion of some perspectives in the discourse. While a considerable body of research has been conducted on farmers, consumers, and the public, research on policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers themselves is less prevalent. Interestingly, studies on farmers mainly focus on their views on certain applications, i.e. as passive recipients of (potential) applications, rather than how they can actively participate in shaping the bioeconomy. Noting a reliance on survey methods, shifting to more participatory research methods could enhance stakeholder engagement. Furthermore, the conceptualisation of acceptance in the literature is predominantly passive to date, focusing on attitudes and perceptions, often in relation to concepts rather than tangible or real objects. As bioeconomy innovations become more common, research will need to shift towards understanding active acceptance, how people engage with and adopt these innovations in their everyday lives. This shift will be critical for building a bioeconomy that is sustainable, just and inclusive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信