Ying Zhang , Zengxin Zhang , Qi Zhang , Xingnan Zhang , Yang Xu , Xiaoyang Liu , Jingqiao Mao , Chongyu Xu
{"title":"金沙江流域大库群径流对气候变化响应的累积与抵消效应","authors":"Ying Zhang , Zengxin Zhang , Qi Zhang , Xingnan Zhang , Yang Xu , Xiaoyang Liu , Jingqiao Mao , Chongyu Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Region</h3><div>Jinsha River Basin (JRB), situated in the upper sections of the Yangtze River basin, China</div></div><div><h3>Study Focus</h3><div>The Jinsha River Basin (JRB), renowned as the world's largest hydropower base. In this study, we proposed a novel approach for separating the reservoir's influence on streamflow and the response mechanisms in diverse watersheds. We integrated XGBoost (the eXtreme Gradient Boosting), CNN-LSTM (Convolutional Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory) and Informer with 6 hydrological stations data for streamflow reconstruction. Traditional hydrological model SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) served as a benchmark.</div></div><div><h3>New Hydrological Insights for the Region</h3><div>Reservoir groups were exerting average 40.7 % influence on streamflow after 2010, altering the streamflow with maximum 20 % in the upstream, 42 % midstream and 60 % downstream in August in JRB. Also, reservoir regulation significantly shifted the seasonal streamflow pattern (especially low water season) in the JRB. Under extreme wet (SDI≥2) in flood season (June-November), the maximum reservoir regulated streamflow offsetting varied between 14.3 % and 28.6 % (2000–4000 m<sup>3</sup>/s out of Q<sub>max</sub>=14000 m<sup>3</sup>/s). Conversely, under extreme drought (SDI≤-2) in the low water season, reservoir regulated streamflow accumulation accounted for 25–44.4 % (100–800 m<sup>3</sup>/s out of Q<sub>max</sub>=1800 m<sup>3</sup>/s). Moreover, the XGBoost model can provide a new way for streamflow reconstruction and forecast, particularly in the quantification of the reservoir groups under climate change. Reservoir storage efficiency was more obvious in the midstream, especially after 2015 (with normalized difference (S<sub>reconstruction</sub> – S<sub>observation</sub>)> 0 more frequent), while released more in the downstream after 2010 (with normalized difference<0 more frequent). The streamflow reconstruction simulation had a stronger correlation with the catchment streamflow than large-scale atmospheric circulation indices. In summary, our study demonstrates models forecast reliability in streamflow reconstruction under climate change and reservoirs, providing a new reasoning approach for extreme streamflow event early warning resulting from large reservoir operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102480"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cumulative and offsetting effects of Streamflow Response to Climate change and Large Reservoir Group in the Jinsha River Basin, China\",\"authors\":\"Ying Zhang , Zengxin Zhang , Qi Zhang , Xingnan Zhang , Yang Xu , Xiaoyang Liu , Jingqiao Mao , Chongyu Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study Region</h3><div>Jinsha River Basin (JRB), situated in the upper sections of the Yangtze River basin, China</div></div><div><h3>Study Focus</h3><div>The Jinsha River Basin (JRB), renowned as the world's largest hydropower base. In this study, we proposed a novel approach for separating the reservoir's influence on streamflow and the response mechanisms in diverse watersheds. We integrated XGBoost (the eXtreme Gradient Boosting), CNN-LSTM (Convolutional Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory) and Informer with 6 hydrological stations data for streamflow reconstruction. Traditional hydrological model SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) served as a benchmark.</div></div><div><h3>New Hydrological Insights for the Region</h3><div>Reservoir groups were exerting average 40.7 % influence on streamflow after 2010, altering the streamflow with maximum 20 % in the upstream, 42 % midstream and 60 % downstream in August in JRB. Also, reservoir regulation significantly shifted the seasonal streamflow pattern (especially low water season) in the JRB. Under extreme wet (SDI≥2) in flood season (June-November), the maximum reservoir regulated streamflow offsetting varied between 14.3 % and 28.6 % (2000–4000 m<sup>3</sup>/s out of Q<sub>max</sub>=14000 m<sup>3</sup>/s). Conversely, under extreme drought (SDI≤-2) in the low water season, reservoir regulated streamflow accumulation accounted for 25–44.4 % (100–800 m<sup>3</sup>/s out of Q<sub>max</sub>=1800 m<sup>3</sup>/s). Moreover, the XGBoost model can provide a new way for streamflow reconstruction and forecast, particularly in the quantification of the reservoir groups under climate change. Reservoir storage efficiency was more obvious in the midstream, especially after 2015 (with normalized difference (S<sub>reconstruction</sub> – S<sub>observation</sub>)> 0 more frequent), while released more in the downstream after 2010 (with normalized difference<0 more frequent). The streamflow reconstruction simulation had a stronger correlation with the catchment streamflow than large-scale atmospheric circulation indices. In summary, our study demonstrates models forecast reliability in streamflow reconstruction under climate change and reservoirs, providing a new reasoning approach for extreme streamflow event early warning resulting from large reservoir operations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825003052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825003052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cumulative and offsetting effects of Streamflow Response to Climate change and Large Reservoir Group in the Jinsha River Basin, China
Study Region
Jinsha River Basin (JRB), situated in the upper sections of the Yangtze River basin, China
Study Focus
The Jinsha River Basin (JRB), renowned as the world's largest hydropower base. In this study, we proposed a novel approach for separating the reservoir's influence on streamflow and the response mechanisms in diverse watersheds. We integrated XGBoost (the eXtreme Gradient Boosting), CNN-LSTM (Convolutional Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory) and Informer with 6 hydrological stations data for streamflow reconstruction. Traditional hydrological model SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) served as a benchmark.
New Hydrological Insights for the Region
Reservoir groups were exerting average 40.7 % influence on streamflow after 2010, altering the streamflow with maximum 20 % in the upstream, 42 % midstream and 60 % downstream in August in JRB. Also, reservoir regulation significantly shifted the seasonal streamflow pattern (especially low water season) in the JRB. Under extreme wet (SDI≥2) in flood season (June-November), the maximum reservoir regulated streamflow offsetting varied between 14.3 % and 28.6 % (2000–4000 m3/s out of Qmax=14000 m3/s). Conversely, under extreme drought (SDI≤-2) in the low water season, reservoir regulated streamflow accumulation accounted for 25–44.4 % (100–800 m3/s out of Qmax=1800 m3/s). Moreover, the XGBoost model can provide a new way for streamflow reconstruction and forecast, particularly in the quantification of the reservoir groups under climate change. Reservoir storage efficiency was more obvious in the midstream, especially after 2015 (with normalized difference (Sreconstruction – Sobservation)> 0 more frequent), while released more in the downstream after 2010 (with normalized difference<0 more frequent). The streamflow reconstruction simulation had a stronger correlation with the catchment streamflow than large-scale atmospheric circulation indices. In summary, our study demonstrates models forecast reliability in streamflow reconstruction under climate change and reservoirs, providing a new reasoning approach for extreme streamflow event early warning resulting from large reservoir operations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.