共享道路:政治意识形态和政党偏好作为公共交通基础设施支持的驱动因素

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Joanna Syrda
{"title":"共享道路:政治意识形态和政党偏好作为公共交通基础设施支持的驱动因素","authors":"Joanna Syrda","doi":"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urgently needed policy efforts to reduce emissions are often met with divided support, arguably along political lines. While an effective path forward requires shared attitudes and cooperation, political polarization on this issue has been observed in many countries, including the UK.</div><div>Using a representative sample of British citizens (N = 2,515), this research is the first to examine if and to what extent political ideologies − specifically welfarism and economic left–right orientation − along with party preference, drive support for various transport infrastructure policy directions: (a) new cycle lanes, (b) improving existing public transport, (c) spaces for electric car charging points, (d) building carparks, (e) widening pavements, and (f) creating pedestrian high streets – individually and as an aggregate scale.</div><div>While left-leaning individuals are more likely to support the listed transport initiatives both in aggregate and individually, this research is the first to show that welfarist political ideology plays the most significant role in half of the cases and ranks second only to political party preference in the other half. This highly significant positive relationship between welfarism and these transport initiatives is moderated – and strengthened − by both high interest in politics and high degree of closeness to a political party.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":328,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 103012"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sharing the road: Political ideologies and political party preference as drivers of public transport infrastructure support\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Syrda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urgently needed policy efforts to reduce emissions are often met with divided support, arguably along political lines. While an effective path forward requires shared attitudes and cooperation, political polarization on this issue has been observed in many countries, including the UK.</div><div>Using a representative sample of British citizens (N = 2,515), this research is the first to examine if and to what extent political ideologies − specifically welfarism and economic left–right orientation − along with party preference, drive support for various transport infrastructure policy directions: (a) new cycle lanes, (b) improving existing public transport, (c) spaces for electric car charging points, (d) building carparks, (e) widening pavements, and (f) creating pedestrian high streets – individually and as an aggregate scale.</div><div>While left-leaning individuals are more likely to support the listed transport initiatives both in aggregate and individually, this research is the first to show that welfarist political ideology plays the most significant role in half of the cases and ranks second only to political party preference in the other half. This highly significant positive relationship between welfarism and these transport initiatives is moderated – and strengthened − by both high interest in politics and high degree of closeness to a political party.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378025000494\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378025000494","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迫切需要的减排政策努力往往得不到不同的支持,可以说是政治上的分歧。有效的前进道路需要共同的态度和合作,但包括英国在内的许多国家在这一问题上出现了政治两极分化。这项研究使用了英国公民的代表性样本(N = 2515),首次检验了政治意识形态——特别是福利主义和经济左右取向——以及政党偏好是否以及在多大程度上推动了对各种交通基础设施政策方向的支持:(a)新建自行车道;(b)改善现有的公共交通;(c)为电动汽车充电点提供空间;(d)兴建停车场;(e)拓宽人行道;以及(f)单独或整体兴建步行街。虽然左倾的个人更有可能在总体上和个人上支持列出的交通倡议,但这项研究首次表明,福利主义的政治意识形态在一半的情况下发挥了最重要的作用,在另一半的情况下仅次于政党偏好。福利主义和这些交通倡议之间的这种高度显著的积极关系,由于对政治的高度兴趣和与政党的高度亲密关系而得到缓和和加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sharing the road: Political ideologies and political party preference as drivers of public transport infrastructure support
Urgently needed policy efforts to reduce emissions are often met with divided support, arguably along political lines. While an effective path forward requires shared attitudes and cooperation, political polarization on this issue has been observed in many countries, including the UK.
Using a representative sample of British citizens (N = 2,515), this research is the first to examine if and to what extent political ideologies − specifically welfarism and economic left–right orientation − along with party preference, drive support for various transport infrastructure policy directions: (a) new cycle lanes, (b) improving existing public transport, (c) spaces for electric car charging points, (d) building carparks, (e) widening pavements, and (f) creating pedestrian high streets – individually and as an aggregate scale.
While left-leaning individuals are more likely to support the listed transport initiatives both in aggregate and individually, this research is the first to show that welfarist political ideology plays the most significant role in half of the cases and ranks second only to political party preference in the other half. This highly significant positive relationship between welfarism and these transport initiatives is moderated – and strengthened − by both high interest in politics and high degree of closeness to a political party.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Environmental Change
Global Environmental Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Global Environmental Change is a prestigious international journal that publishes articles of high quality, both theoretically and empirically rigorous. The journal aims to contribute to the understanding of global environmental change from the perspectives of human and policy dimensions. Specifically, it considers global environmental change as the result of processes occurring at the local level, but with wide-ranging impacts on various spatial, temporal, and socio-political scales. In terms of content, the journal seeks articles with a strong social science component. This includes research that examines the societal drivers and consequences of environmental change, as well as social and policy processes that aim to address these challenges. While the journal covers a broad range of topics, including biodiversity and ecosystem services, climate, coasts, food systems, land use and land cover, oceans, urban areas, and water resources, it also welcomes contributions that investigate the drivers, consequences, and management of other areas affected by environmental change. Overall, Global Environmental Change encourages research that deepens our understanding of the complex interactions between human activities and the environment, with the goal of informing policy and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信