Isabel Boavida , Maria João Costa , José Maria Santos
{"title":"小型水电站提供的社区认知和生态系统服务","authors":"Isabel Boavida , Maria João Costa , José Maria Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small hydropower plants (SHPs) are increasingly promoted for their potential to provide renewable energy in rural regions, but their impact on river ecosystems and local communities remains a topic of debate. This study explores the ecological and socio-economic effects provided by small hydropower plants (SHPs) on river ecosystem services (ES) in rural regions. Through two case studies of SHPs on the Couto and Avelames Rivers (NE Portugal), we assessed local communities' awareness and perceptions of the implementations of those infrastructures and the ES provided by these modified water bodies, by using a face-to-face survey of 114 respondents near the SHPs locations. The results indicate that 70 % of respondents preferred the water body created by the SHPs weirs for recreational purposes, and 83 % acknowledged that riverside areas enhanced their well-being. Economic benefits were also important, with 39 % of respondents recognizing improvements in job creation, river access, and regional economic growth due to the SHPs. Clean energy production and water storage were identified as the most valued ES, with principal component analysis (PCA) showing high loadings for these services (0.549 for recreational activities and 0.807 for storage). Despite these benefits, 32 % of respondents expressed a preference for pre-SHP river conditions, citing concerns over ecological impacts. Only 39 % of respondents were willing to pay for river conservation efforts, highlighting economic constraints in these rural communities and a perception among locals that the responsibility for maintaining river ecosystems lies with public authorities. The study emphasizes the need for balancing clean energy production with the preservation of river ecosystems and the inclusion of local communities in SHPs environmental impact assessments to ensure a sustainable development of these regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community perceptions and ecosystem services provided by small hydropower plants\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Boavida , Maria João Costa , José Maria Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Small hydropower plants (SHPs) are increasingly promoted for their potential to provide renewable energy in rural regions, but their impact on river ecosystems and local communities remains a topic of debate. This study explores the ecological and socio-economic effects provided by small hydropower plants (SHPs) on river ecosystem services (ES) in rural regions. Through two case studies of SHPs on the Couto and Avelames Rivers (NE Portugal), we assessed local communities' awareness and perceptions of the implementations of those infrastructures and the ES provided by these modified water bodies, by using a face-to-face survey of 114 respondents near the SHPs locations. The results indicate that 70 % of respondents preferred the water body created by the SHPs weirs for recreational purposes, and 83 % acknowledged that riverside areas enhanced their well-being. Economic benefits were also important, with 39 % of respondents recognizing improvements in job creation, river access, and regional economic growth due to the SHPs. Clean energy production and water storage were identified as the most valued ES, with principal component analysis (PCA) showing high loadings for these services (0.549 for recreational activities and 0.807 for storage). Despite these benefits, 32 % of respondents expressed a preference for pre-SHP river conditions, citing concerns over ecological impacts. Only 39 % of respondents were willing to pay for river conservation efforts, highlighting economic constraints in these rural communities and a perception among locals that the responsibility for maintaining river ecosystems lies with public authorities. The study emphasizes the need for balancing clean energy production with the preservation of river ecosystems and the inclusion of local communities in SHPs environmental impact assessments to ensure a sustainable development of these regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Development\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Community perceptions and ecosystem services provided by small hydropower plants
Small hydropower plants (SHPs) are increasingly promoted for their potential to provide renewable energy in rural regions, but their impact on river ecosystems and local communities remains a topic of debate. This study explores the ecological and socio-economic effects provided by small hydropower plants (SHPs) on river ecosystem services (ES) in rural regions. Through two case studies of SHPs on the Couto and Avelames Rivers (NE Portugal), we assessed local communities' awareness and perceptions of the implementations of those infrastructures and the ES provided by these modified water bodies, by using a face-to-face survey of 114 respondents near the SHPs locations. The results indicate that 70 % of respondents preferred the water body created by the SHPs weirs for recreational purposes, and 83 % acknowledged that riverside areas enhanced their well-being. Economic benefits were also important, with 39 % of respondents recognizing improvements in job creation, river access, and regional economic growth due to the SHPs. Clean energy production and water storage were identified as the most valued ES, with principal component analysis (PCA) showing high loadings for these services (0.549 for recreational activities and 0.807 for storage). Despite these benefits, 32 % of respondents expressed a preference for pre-SHP river conditions, citing concerns over ecological impacts. Only 39 % of respondents were willing to pay for river conservation efforts, highlighting economic constraints in these rural communities and a perception among locals that the responsibility for maintaining river ecosystems lies with public authorities. The study emphasizes the need for balancing clean energy production with the preservation of river ecosystems and the inclusion of local communities in SHPs environmental impact assessments to ensure a sustainable development of these regions.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.