小型水电站提供的社区认知和生态系统服务

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Isabel Boavida , Maria João Costa , José Maria Santos
{"title":"小型水电站提供的社区认知和生态系统服务","authors":"Isabel Boavida ,&nbsp;Maria João Costa ,&nbsp;José Maria Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small hydropower plants (SHPs) are increasingly promoted for their potential to provide renewable energy in rural regions, but their impact on river ecosystems and local communities remains a topic of debate. This study explores the ecological and socio-economic effects provided by small hydropower plants (SHPs) on river ecosystem services (ES) in rural regions. Through two case studies of SHPs on the Couto and Avelames Rivers (NE Portugal), we assessed local communities' awareness and perceptions of the implementations of those infrastructures and the ES provided by these modified water bodies, by using a face-to-face survey of 114 respondents near the SHPs locations. The results indicate that 70 % of respondents preferred the water body created by the SHPs weirs for recreational purposes, and 83 % acknowledged that riverside areas enhanced their well-being. Economic benefits were also important, with 39 % of respondents recognizing improvements in job creation, river access, and regional economic growth due to the SHPs. Clean energy production and water storage were identified as the most valued ES, with principal component analysis (PCA) showing high loadings for these services (0.549 for recreational activities and 0.807 for storage). Despite these benefits, 32 % of respondents expressed a preference for pre-SHP river conditions, citing concerns over ecological impacts. Only 39 % of respondents were willing to pay for river conservation efforts, highlighting economic constraints in these rural communities and a perception among locals that the responsibility for maintaining river ecosystems lies with public authorities. The study emphasizes the need for balancing clean energy production with the preservation of river ecosystems and the inclusion of local communities in SHPs environmental impact assessments to ensure a sustainable development of these regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community perceptions and ecosystem services provided by small hydropower plants\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Boavida ,&nbsp;Maria João Costa ,&nbsp;José Maria Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Small hydropower plants (SHPs) are increasingly promoted for their potential to provide renewable energy in rural regions, but their impact on river ecosystems and local communities remains a topic of debate. This study explores the ecological and socio-economic effects provided by small hydropower plants (SHPs) on river ecosystem services (ES) in rural regions. Through two case studies of SHPs on the Couto and Avelames Rivers (NE Portugal), we assessed local communities' awareness and perceptions of the implementations of those infrastructures and the ES provided by these modified water bodies, by using a face-to-face survey of 114 respondents near the SHPs locations. The results indicate that 70 % of respondents preferred the water body created by the SHPs weirs for recreational purposes, and 83 % acknowledged that riverside areas enhanced their well-being. Economic benefits were also important, with 39 % of respondents recognizing improvements in job creation, river access, and regional economic growth due to the SHPs. Clean energy production and water storage were identified as the most valued ES, with principal component analysis (PCA) showing high loadings for these services (0.549 for recreational activities and 0.807 for storage). Despite these benefits, 32 % of respondents expressed a preference for pre-SHP river conditions, citing concerns over ecological impacts. Only 39 % of respondents were willing to pay for river conservation efforts, highlighting economic constraints in these rural communities and a perception among locals that the responsibility for maintaining river ecosystems lies with public authorities. The study emphasizes the need for balancing clean energy production with the preservation of river ecosystems and the inclusion of local communities in SHPs environmental impact assessments to ensure a sustainable development of these regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Development\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小型水电站因其在农村地区提供可再生能源的潜力而受到越来越多的推广,但它们对河流生态系统和当地社区的影响仍然是一个有争议的话题。本研究探讨了小型水电站对农村地区河流生态系统服务的生态和社会经济影响。通过对Couto河和Avelames河(葡萄牙东北部)上SHPs的两个案例研究,我们通过对SHPs地点附近114名受访者的面对面调查,评估了当地社区对这些基础设施实施的认识和看法,以及这些修改后的水体所提供的ES。调查结果显示,70%的受访者表示,他们更喜欢兴建小型污水处理厂堰所形成的水体作康乐用途,而83%的受访者则认为滨江地区能改善他们的生活。经济效益也很重要,39%的受访者认为,由于小水电项目,在创造就业机会、河流通道和区域经济增长方面有所改善。清洁能源生产和水储存被确定为最有价值的ES,主成分分析(PCA)显示这些服务的高负荷(娱乐活动为0.549,储存为0.807)。尽管有这些好处,但32%的受访者表示更喜欢shp之前的河流状况,理由是担心生态影响。只有39%的受访者愿意为河流保护工作付费,这突出了这些农村社区的经济限制,以及当地人认为维护河流生态系统的责任在于政府当局。该研究强调需要在清洁能源生产与保护河流生态系统之间取得平衡,并将当地社区纳入小水电项目的环境影响评估,以确保这些地区的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community perceptions and ecosystem services provided by small hydropower plants
Small hydropower plants (SHPs) are increasingly promoted for their potential to provide renewable energy in rural regions, but their impact on river ecosystems and local communities remains a topic of debate. This study explores the ecological and socio-economic effects provided by small hydropower plants (SHPs) on river ecosystem services (ES) in rural regions. Through two case studies of SHPs on the Couto and Avelames Rivers (NE Portugal), we assessed local communities' awareness and perceptions of the implementations of those infrastructures and the ES provided by these modified water bodies, by using a face-to-face survey of 114 respondents near the SHPs locations. The results indicate that 70 % of respondents preferred the water body created by the SHPs weirs for recreational purposes, and 83 % acknowledged that riverside areas enhanced their well-being. Economic benefits were also important, with 39 % of respondents recognizing improvements in job creation, river access, and regional economic growth due to the SHPs. Clean energy production and water storage were identified as the most valued ES, with principal component analysis (PCA) showing high loadings for these services (0.549 for recreational activities and 0.807 for storage). Despite these benefits, 32 % of respondents expressed a preference for pre-SHP river conditions, citing concerns over ecological impacts. Only 39 % of respondents were willing to pay for river conservation efforts, highlighting economic constraints in these rural communities and a perception among locals that the responsibility for maintaining river ecosystems lies with public authorities. The study emphasizes the need for balancing clean energy production with the preservation of river ecosystems and the inclusion of local communities in SHPs environmental impact assessments to ensure a sustainable development of these regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信