克莱顿胜任力评价量表2.0的效度和信度检验©（CCEI 2.0）

IF 2.5 3区医学 Q1 NURSING

Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-05-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101736

Julie A. Manz PhD, RN, CNE , Martha J. Todd PhD, APRN–NP , Lindsay Iverson DNP, APRN, ACNP-BC , Sarah J. Ball PhD, RNC–OB, C-EFM, CHSE , Lucas Manning DNP, RN, CHSE , Robert Topp PhD, RN

{"title":"克莱顿胜任力评价量表2.0的效度和信度检验©（CCEI 2.0）","authors":"Julie A. Manz PhD, RN, CNE , Martha J. Todd PhD, APRN–NP , Lindsay Iverson DNP, APRN, ACNP-BC , Sarah J. Ball PhD, RNC–OB, C-EFM, CHSE , Lucas Manning DNP, RN, CHSE , Robert Topp PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurse educators are committed to preparing the next generation of clinically proficient nurses through competency-based education (CBE). The Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument© 2.0 (CCEI 2.0) has demonstrated content validity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency reliability, criterion-related validity, and test-retest reliability of the CCEI 2.0.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>104 nurse educator participants were randomly assigned to view and score a video depicting a nurse-actor in a simulated clinical experience performing at a level of below competency, at expected level of competency, or above expected level of competency. Four weeks later, 45 participants scored the same video again to determine test-retest reliability of the instrument.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cronbach’s alpha and item-total correlations reveal that the CCEI 2.0 indicates a high degree of internal consistency for Clinical Judgment Score (α = 0.913), Total Competency score (α = 0.948), and for criterion-related validity. Test-retest reliability demonstrated reliability of the instrument over time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CCEI 2.0 provides nurse educators with instrument that has demonstrated validity and reliability to assess student competency in simulated clinical experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 101736"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability testing of the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument 2.0© (CCEI 2.0)\",\"authors\":\"Julie A. Manz PhD, RN, CNE , Martha J. Todd PhD, APRN–NP , Lindsay Iverson DNP, APRN, ACNP-BC , Sarah J. Ball PhD, RNC–OB, C-EFM, CHSE , Lucas Manning DNP, RN, CHSE , Robert Topp PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurse educators are committed to preparing the next generation of clinically proficient nurses through competency-based education (CBE). The Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument© 2.0 (CCEI 2.0) has demonstrated content validity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency reliability, criterion-related validity, and test-retest reliability of the CCEI 2.0.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>104 nurse educator participants were randomly assigned to view and score a video depicting a nurse-actor in a simulated clinical experience performing at a level of below competency, at expected level of competency, or above expected level of competency. Four weeks later, 45 participants scored the same video again to determine test-retest reliability of the instrument.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cronbach’s alpha and item-total correlations reveal that the CCEI 2.0 indicates a high degree of internal consistency for Clinical Judgment Score (α = 0.913), Total Competency score (α = 0.948), and for criterion-related validity. Test-retest reliability demonstrated reliability of the instrument over time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CCEI 2.0 provides nurse educators with instrument that has demonstrated validity and reliability to assess student competency in simulated clinical experiences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000532\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景护士教育者致力于通过能力教育（CBE）培养下一代临床熟练护士。克莱顿胜任力评估量表©2.0 （CCEI 2.0）已通过内容效度验证。本研究的目的是评估CCEI 2.0的内部一致性信度、标准相关效度和重测信度。方法104名护士教育参与者被随机分配观看并评分一段视频，视频描述了一名护士演员在模拟临床经验中以低于能力水平、达到预期能力水平或高于预期能力水平的表现。四周后，45名参与者再次对相同的视频进行评分，以确定该仪器的反复测试可靠性。结果scronbach α和项目-总相关分析表明，CCEI 2.0在临床判断评分（α = 0.913）、总胜任力评分（α = 0.948）和标准相关效度上具有高度的内部一致性。反复测试的可靠性证明了仪器随时间的可靠性。结论CCEI 2.0为护士教育工作者提供了一种有效、可靠的工具来评估学生在模拟临床经验中的能力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Validity and reliability testing of the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument 2.0© (CCEI 2.0)

Background

Nurse educators are committed to preparing the next generation of clinically proficient nurses through competency-based education (CBE). The Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument© 2.0 (CCEI 2.0) has demonstrated content validity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency reliability, criterion-related validity, and test-retest reliability of the CCEI 2.0.

Methods

104 nurse educator participants were randomly assigned to view and score a video depicting a nurse-actor in a simulated clinical experience performing at a level of below competency, at expected level of competency, or above expected level of competency. Four weeks later, 45 participants scored the same video again to determine test-retest reliability of the instrument.

Results

Cronbach’s alpha and item-total correlations reveal that the CCEI 2.0 indicates a high degree of internal consistency for Clinical Judgment Score (α = 0.913), Total Competency score (α = 0.948), and for criterion-related validity. Test-retest reliability demonstrated reliability of the instrument over time.

Conclusion

The CCEI 2.0 provides nurse educators with instrument that has demonstrated validity and reliability to assess student competency in simulated clinical experiences.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Simulation in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

15.40%

发文量

107

期刊介绍： Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.