经导管关闭动脉导管未闭婴儿体重小于6公斤-一个双中心的经验。技术方面的考虑。

Cardiology journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.5603/cj.102639
Michał Gałeczka, Michał Kapałka, Maciej Chojnicki, Michał Krawiec, Filip Tyc, Roland Fiszer
{"title":"经导管关闭动脉导管未闭婴儿体重小于6公斤-一个双中心的经验。技术方面的考虑。","authors":"Michał Gałeczka, Michał Kapałka, Maciej Chojnicki, Michał Krawiec, Filip Tyc, Roland Fiszer","doi":"10.5603/cj.102639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter closure has become the method of choice for treating patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in a majority of patients. The only approved device for treating infants weighing less than 6 kilograms is the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder (APO). The aim of this study is to summarize the experience of two centers in performing transcatheter PDA closure in infants weighing less than 6 kilograms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, descriptive, and nonrandomized analysis included all 45 infants weighing less than 6 kg who underwent transcatheter PDA closure between 2013 and 2023 at two tertiary centers, following the introduction of APO. Medical records, procedural outcomes, and one-month follow-up were analyzed. Applied devices were: APO in 37 (of whom 3 were off-label due to PDA size), Amplatzer Duct Occluder I (ADO) in 3, and Amplatzer Vascular Plug II (AVP) in 5 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success rate was 97.8%. There were 2 major complications (4.4%), including one device protrusion. A residual shunt was noted in one patient 24 hours after the procedure, but none were observed after one month. Off-label devices were implanted in insignificantly larger and longer PDAs. There were no significant differences between the labeled and off-label groups in terms of procedural success, major complications, or residual shunts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>APO is a safe and effective device to treat PDA in infants weighing less than 6 kilograms, however, off-label devices are needed in a considerable number of patients. Proper use of off-label devices yields comparable to APO results.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":"228-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in infants weighing less than 6 kilograms - a two-center experience. Technical considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Michał Gałeczka, Michał Kapałka, Maciej Chojnicki, Michał Krawiec, Filip Tyc, Roland Fiszer\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/cj.102639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter closure has become the method of choice for treating patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in a majority of patients. The only approved device for treating infants weighing less than 6 kilograms is the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder (APO). The aim of this study is to summarize the experience of two centers in performing transcatheter PDA closure in infants weighing less than 6 kilograms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, descriptive, and nonrandomized analysis included all 45 infants weighing less than 6 kg who underwent transcatheter PDA closure between 2013 and 2023 at two tertiary centers, following the introduction of APO. Medical records, procedural outcomes, and one-month follow-up were analyzed. Applied devices were: APO in 37 (of whom 3 were off-label due to PDA size), Amplatzer Duct Occluder I (ADO) in 3, and Amplatzer Vascular Plug II (AVP) in 5 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success rate was 97.8%. There were 2 major complications (4.4%), including one device protrusion. A residual shunt was noted in one patient 24 hours after the procedure, but none were observed after one month. Off-label devices were implanted in insignificantly larger and longer PDAs. There were no significant differences between the labeled and off-label groups in terms of procedural success, major complications, or residual shunts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>APO is a safe and effective device to treat PDA in infants weighing less than 6 kilograms, however, off-label devices are needed in a considerable number of patients. Proper use of off-label devices yields comparable to APO results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"228-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221319/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.102639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.102639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管闭合已成为大多数患者治疗动脉导管未闭(PDA)的首选方法。唯一被批准用于治疗体重低于6公斤婴儿的设备是Amplatzer Piccolo闭塞器(APO)。本研究的目的是总结两个中心对体重小于6公斤的婴儿进行经导管PDA闭合的经验。方法:回顾性、描述性和非随机分析纳入了2013年至2023年间在两个三级中心接受经导管PDA关闭术的45名体重小于6kg的婴儿,随后引入了APO。分析医疗记录、手术结果和1个月随访。应用的器械为:37例APO(其中3例因PDA尺寸超出说明书),3例Amplatzer导管闭塞器I (ADO), 5例Amplatzer血管塞II (AVP)。结果:总成功率97.8%。主要并发症2例(4.4%),包括1例器械突出。1例患者术后24小时发现残留分流,但1个月后未发现。标签外装置植入不明显更大和更长的pda。标签组和非标签组在手术成功率、主要并发症或残余分流方面没有显著差异。结论:APO是一种安全有效的治疗体重小于6 kg婴儿PDA的装置,但相当一部分患者需要说明书外装置。正确使用标签外设备可产生与APO结果相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in infants weighing less than 6 kilograms - a two-center experience. Technical considerations.

Background: Transcatheter closure has become the method of choice for treating patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in a majority of patients. The only approved device for treating infants weighing less than 6 kilograms is the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder (APO). The aim of this study is to summarize the experience of two centers in performing transcatheter PDA closure in infants weighing less than 6 kilograms.

Methods: Retrospective, descriptive, and nonrandomized analysis included all 45 infants weighing less than 6 kg who underwent transcatheter PDA closure between 2013 and 2023 at two tertiary centers, following the introduction of APO. Medical records, procedural outcomes, and one-month follow-up were analyzed. Applied devices were: APO in 37 (of whom 3 were off-label due to PDA size), Amplatzer Duct Occluder I (ADO) in 3, and Amplatzer Vascular Plug II (AVP) in 5 cases.

Results: The overall success rate was 97.8%. There were 2 major complications (4.4%), including one device protrusion. A residual shunt was noted in one patient 24 hours after the procedure, but none were observed after one month. Off-label devices were implanted in insignificantly larger and longer PDAs. There were no significant differences between the labeled and off-label groups in terms of procedural success, major complications, or residual shunts.

Conclusions: APO is a safe and effective device to treat PDA in infants weighing less than 6 kilograms, however, off-label devices are needed in a considerable number of patients. Proper use of off-label devices yields comparable to APO results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信