José-Manuel Rubio-Campal, Carlos Rodriguez Lopez, Carla Lázaro Rivera, Francisco de Asís Díaz Cortegana, Loreto Bravo Calero, Cristina Aguilera Agudo, José María Romero-Otero, José Tuñón Fernández
{"title":"基线左室射血分数预测服用苏比里尔/缬沙坦的患者改善程度。","authors":"José-Manuel Rubio-Campal, Carlos Rodriguez Lopez, Carla Lázaro Rivera, Francisco de Asís Díaz Cortegana, Loreto Bravo Calero, Cristina Aguilera Agudo, José María Romero-Otero, José Tuñón Fernández","doi":"10.5603/cj.104310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure patients, but the magnitude of improvement may depend on baseline values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed whether baseline LVEF can predict its improvement in patients with LVEF ≤ 45% receiving S/V. Patients were divided into 4 groups (G) according to baseline LVEF (G1: ≤ 20%; G2: 21-30%; G3: 31-40%; G4: 41-45%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 256 patients (age 73 ± 12 years; 73% male; 174 ischemic cardiomyopathy [CM], 82 nonischemic CM) and assessed LVEF at S/V initiation and at 6 and 12 months of therapy. Baseline LVEF (%) values (overall 30.9 ± 8.6) were: G1: 17.3 ± 3.3; G2: 27.5 ± 2.4; G3: 35.5 ± 2; G4: 44.4 ± 1. LVEF increased in 62% of patients, reaching 34.3 ± 10.4% and 35.5 ± 11.2% at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001). A significantly higher absolute LVEF increase was found in Groups 3 (7.2 ± 4.3) and 4 (4.2 ± 3.05) than in Groups 1 (0.6 ± 1.5) and 2 (3.5 ± 1.5), in women (5.9 ± 4.4 vs. 4.1 ± 4.5; p < 0.001), with high S/V doses (7.4 ± 4.7 vs. 4.3 ± 4.4; p < 0.001), and in nonischemic CM (6.3 ± 4.9 vs. 3.8 ± 4.2; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, female sex (OR 2.18; 95% CI [1.06-4.48]; p = 0.034), high dose (OR 3.38; 95% CI [1.10-10.34]; p = 0.033), and baseline LVEF > 30% (OR 8.62; 95% CI [4.69-15.82]; p = 0.001) were significant predictors of LVEF improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LVEF improvement with S/V depends on baseline values, sex, and dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":"270-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction predicts the magnitude of improvement in patients taking sacubitril/valsartan.\",\"authors\":\"José-Manuel Rubio-Campal, Carlos Rodriguez Lopez, Carla Lázaro Rivera, Francisco de Asís Díaz Cortegana, Loreto Bravo Calero, Cristina Aguilera Agudo, José María Romero-Otero, José Tuñón Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/cj.104310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure patients, but the magnitude of improvement may depend on baseline values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed whether baseline LVEF can predict its improvement in patients with LVEF ≤ 45% receiving S/V. Patients were divided into 4 groups (G) according to baseline LVEF (G1: ≤ 20%; G2: 21-30%; G3: 31-40%; G4: 41-45%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 256 patients (age 73 ± 12 years; 73% male; 174 ischemic cardiomyopathy [CM], 82 nonischemic CM) and assessed LVEF at S/V initiation and at 6 and 12 months of therapy. Baseline LVEF (%) values (overall 30.9 ± 8.6) were: G1: 17.3 ± 3.3; G2: 27.5 ± 2.4; G3: 35.5 ± 2; G4: 44.4 ± 1. LVEF increased in 62% of patients, reaching 34.3 ± 10.4% and 35.5 ± 11.2% at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001). A significantly higher absolute LVEF increase was found in Groups 3 (7.2 ± 4.3) and 4 (4.2 ± 3.05) than in Groups 1 (0.6 ± 1.5) and 2 (3.5 ± 1.5), in women (5.9 ± 4.4 vs. 4.1 ± 4.5; p < 0.001), with high S/V doses (7.4 ± 4.7 vs. 4.3 ± 4.4; p < 0.001), and in nonischemic CM (6.3 ± 4.9 vs. 3.8 ± 4.2; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, female sex (OR 2.18; 95% CI [1.06-4.48]; p = 0.034), high dose (OR 3.38; 95% CI [1.10-10.34]; p = 0.033), and baseline LVEF > 30% (OR 8.62; 95% CI [4.69-15.82]; p = 0.001) were significant predictors of LVEF improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LVEF improvement with S/V depends on baseline values, sex, and dose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"270-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221323/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.104310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.104310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Sacubitril/缬沙坦(S/V)可改善心力衰竭患者的左心室射血分数(LVEF),但改善的程度可能取决于基线值。方法:我们分析基线LVEF是否可以预测LVEF≤45%接受S/V治疗的患者的改善。根据基线LVEF分为4组(G) (G1:≤20%;G2: 21 - 30%;G3: 31 - 40%;G4: 41 - 45%)。结果:我们纳入256例患者(年龄73±12岁;男性73%;174例缺血性心肌病(CM), 82例非缺血性心肌病(CM),并在S/V开始和治疗6个月和12个月时评估LVEF。基线LVEF(%)值(总体30.9±8.6)为:G1: 17.3±3.3;G2: 27.5±2.4;G3: 35.5±2;G4: 44.4±1。62%的患者LVEF升高,6个月和12个月分别达到34.3±10.4%和35.5±11.2% (p < 0.001)。3组(7.2±4.3)和4组(4.2±3.05)的绝对LVEF增加明显高于1组(0.6±1.5)和2组(3.5±1.5),女性(5.9±4.4 vs 4.1±4.5);p < 0.001),高S/V剂量组(7.4±4.7 vs. 4.3±4.4;p < 0.001),非缺血性CM组(6.3±4.9 vs 3.8±4.2;P < 0.001)。多因素分析,女性(OR 2.18;95% ci [1.06-4.48];p = 0.034),高剂量组(OR 3.38;95% ci [1.10-10.34];p = 0.033),基线LVEF >为30% (OR 8.62;95% ci [4.69-15.82];p = 0.001)是LVEF改善的显著预测因子。结论:S/V对LVEF的改善取决于基线值、性别和剂量。
Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction predicts the magnitude of improvement in patients taking sacubitril/valsartan.
Background: Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure patients, but the magnitude of improvement may depend on baseline values.
Methods: We analyzed whether baseline LVEF can predict its improvement in patients with LVEF ≤ 45% receiving S/V. Patients were divided into 4 groups (G) according to baseline LVEF (G1: ≤ 20%; G2: 21-30%; G3: 31-40%; G4: 41-45%).
Results: We included 256 patients (age 73 ± 12 years; 73% male; 174 ischemic cardiomyopathy [CM], 82 nonischemic CM) and assessed LVEF at S/V initiation and at 6 and 12 months of therapy. Baseline LVEF (%) values (overall 30.9 ± 8.6) were: G1: 17.3 ± 3.3; G2: 27.5 ± 2.4; G3: 35.5 ± 2; G4: 44.4 ± 1. LVEF increased in 62% of patients, reaching 34.3 ± 10.4% and 35.5 ± 11.2% at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001). A significantly higher absolute LVEF increase was found in Groups 3 (7.2 ± 4.3) and 4 (4.2 ± 3.05) than in Groups 1 (0.6 ± 1.5) and 2 (3.5 ± 1.5), in women (5.9 ± 4.4 vs. 4.1 ± 4.5; p < 0.001), with high S/V doses (7.4 ± 4.7 vs. 4.3 ± 4.4; p < 0.001), and in nonischemic CM (6.3 ± 4.9 vs. 3.8 ± 4.2; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, female sex (OR 2.18; 95% CI [1.06-4.48]; p = 0.034), high dose (OR 3.38; 95% CI [1.10-10.34]; p = 0.033), and baseline LVEF > 30% (OR 8.62; 95% CI [4.69-15.82]; p = 0.001) were significant predictors of LVEF improvement.
Conclusions: LVEF improvement with S/V depends on baseline values, sex, and dose.