澳大利亚和新西兰医科学生开展的研究培训课程和项目。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joanne Hart, Adam Collison, Jon Cornwall, Natalie Edmiston, Di Eley, Kathryn Hird, Wendy Hu, Eleonora Leopardi, Christine Metusela, Lise Mogensen, Judy Mullan, Shannon Pike, Veronica Preda, Kerry Uebel, Megan Wallace, Justin Bilszta
{"title":"澳大利亚和新西兰医科学生开展的研究培训课程和项目。","authors":"Joanne Hart, Adam Collison, Jon Cornwall, Natalie Edmiston, Di Eley, Kathryn Hird, Wendy Hu, Eleonora Leopardi, Christine Metusela, Lise Mogensen, Judy Mullan, Shannon Pike, Veronica Preda, Kerry Uebel, Megan Wallace, Justin Bilszta","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07339-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research training is vital to medical education, providing students with essential skills for their future evidence-based practice. Most medical programs worldwide include opportunities for students to implement projects. However, gaps remain in understanding how research training is delivered, integrated and assessed with project completion, and little data exists on the range of project types and topics. This study aims to document research training curricula across Australian and New Zealand medical schools and explore the types of projects undertaken by students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey of the 23 Australian and New Zealand medical school research training programs was undertaken. The survey recorded details about research training curriculum, project types and topics investigated. The titles of medical student projects completed in 2023 were collected and categorised using standard Australian Bureau of Statistics field of research codes and national health priority areas. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen medical programs responded to the survey (18/23, 78%). The survey responses identified various designs for research training curriculum, including coursework only, and combinations of coursework and different project options. Projects were mandatory in half the programs. Some programs facilitated an Honours year or intercalated higher degree by research. Projects were either integrated into coursework or stand alone, with 78% providing scheduled time to conduct the projects. The titles of 2024 medical student projects completed in 2023 were provided by 17 of the 18 participating medical schools. The research areas covered were broad, with most focusing on biomedical and clinical sciences (69%) or health sciences (20%). Additionally, 34% of the projects addressed Australian National Health Priority areas, with cancer control (28%) and mental health (26%) the most common topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive overview of the current approaches to research training across medical programs in Australia and New Zealand. It highlights the diverse approaches to this aspect of medical education curriculum and the range of project types and topics undertaken by medical students. The findings provide valuable insights for medical curriculum developers and policymakers and can be used to inform research training practices and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"740"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research training curriculum and projects undertaken by medical students in Australia and new Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Hart, Adam Collison, Jon Cornwall, Natalie Edmiston, Di Eley, Kathryn Hird, Wendy Hu, Eleonora Leopardi, Christine Metusela, Lise Mogensen, Judy Mullan, Shannon Pike, Veronica Preda, Kerry Uebel, Megan Wallace, Justin Bilszta\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07339-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research training is vital to medical education, providing students with essential skills for their future evidence-based practice. Most medical programs worldwide include opportunities for students to implement projects. However, gaps remain in understanding how research training is delivered, integrated and assessed with project completion, and little data exists on the range of project types and topics. This study aims to document research training curricula across Australian and New Zealand medical schools and explore the types of projects undertaken by students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey of the 23 Australian and New Zealand medical school research training programs was undertaken. The survey recorded details about research training curriculum, project types and topics investigated. The titles of medical student projects completed in 2023 were collected and categorised using standard Australian Bureau of Statistics field of research codes and national health priority areas. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen medical programs responded to the survey (18/23, 78%). The survey responses identified various designs for research training curriculum, including coursework only, and combinations of coursework and different project options. Projects were mandatory in half the programs. Some programs facilitated an Honours year or intercalated higher degree by research. Projects were either integrated into coursework or stand alone, with 78% providing scheduled time to conduct the projects. The titles of 2024 medical student projects completed in 2023 were provided by 17 of the 18 participating medical schools. The research areas covered were broad, with most focusing on biomedical and clinical sciences (69%) or health sciences (20%). Additionally, 34% of the projects addressed Australian National Health Priority areas, with cancer control (28%) and mental health (26%) the most common topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive overview of the current approaches to research training across medical programs in Australia and New Zealand. It highlights the diverse approaches to this aspect of medical education curriculum and the range of project types and topics undertaken by medical students. The findings provide valuable insights for medical curriculum developers and policymakers and can be used to inform research training practices and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096762/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07339-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07339-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究训练对医学教育至关重要,为学生将来的循证实践提供必要的技能。世界上大多数医学项目都有机会让学生实施项目。然而,在理解如何在项目完成时交付、整合和评估研究培训方面仍然存在差距,而且关于项目类型和主题范围的数据很少。本研究旨在记录澳大利亚和新西兰医学院的研究培训课程,并探讨学生承担的项目类型。方法:对澳大利亚和新西兰23所医学院科研培训项目进行在线调查。调查记录了研究培训课程、项目类型和调查主题的详细信息。根据澳大利亚统计局的标准研究领域代码和国家卫生优先领域,收集和分类了2023年完成的医学生项目的标题。数据分析采用描述性统计。结果:18个医疗专业(18/ 23,78 %)回应了调查。调查结果确定了研究培训课程的各种设计,包括课程作业,以及课程作业和不同项目选择的组合。一半的项目是强制性的。有些课程为获得荣誉学年或通过研究获得更高学位提供便利。项目要么集成到课程作业中,要么单独存在,78%的项目提供了安排好的时间来进行项目。在参与的18所医学院中,有17所提供了2023年完成的2024个医学生项目的名称。涵盖的研究领域很广泛,主要集中在生物医学和临床科学(69%)或健康科学(20%)。此外,34%的项目涉及澳大利亚国家卫生优先领域,其中最常见的主题是癌症控制(28%)和心理健康(26%)。结论:本研究提供了澳大利亚和新西兰医学项目中目前研究培训方法的全面概述。它强调了医学教育课程这方面的不同方法,以及医学生所承担的项目类型和主题的范围。这些发现为医学课程开发人员和决策者提供了有价值的见解,并可用于为研究培训实践和成果提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research training curriculum and projects undertaken by medical students in Australia and new Zealand.

Background: Research training is vital to medical education, providing students with essential skills for their future evidence-based practice. Most medical programs worldwide include opportunities for students to implement projects. However, gaps remain in understanding how research training is delivered, integrated and assessed with project completion, and little data exists on the range of project types and topics. This study aims to document research training curricula across Australian and New Zealand medical schools and explore the types of projects undertaken by students.

Methods: An online survey of the 23 Australian and New Zealand medical school research training programs was undertaken. The survey recorded details about research training curriculum, project types and topics investigated. The titles of medical student projects completed in 2023 were collected and categorised using standard Australian Bureau of Statistics field of research codes and national health priority areas. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Eighteen medical programs responded to the survey (18/23, 78%). The survey responses identified various designs for research training curriculum, including coursework only, and combinations of coursework and different project options. Projects were mandatory in half the programs. Some programs facilitated an Honours year or intercalated higher degree by research. Projects were either integrated into coursework or stand alone, with 78% providing scheduled time to conduct the projects. The titles of 2024 medical student projects completed in 2023 were provided by 17 of the 18 participating medical schools. The research areas covered were broad, with most focusing on biomedical and clinical sciences (69%) or health sciences (20%). Additionally, 34% of the projects addressed Australian National Health Priority areas, with cancer control (28%) and mental health (26%) the most common topics.

Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the current approaches to research training across medical programs in Australia and New Zealand. It highlights the diverse approaches to this aspect of medical education curriculum and the range of project types and topics undertaken by medical students. The findings provide valuable insights for medical curriculum developers and policymakers and can be used to inform research training practices and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信