经验和看法的学生和教师与临床模拟在乌干达:探索性研究。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joshua Epuitai, Pamella R Adongo, Paul Oboth, Felister Apili, Edward Kumakech, Samuel Owusu-Sekyere, Julius N Wandabwa
{"title":"经验和看法的学生和教师与临床模拟在乌干达:探索性研究。","authors":"Joshua Epuitai, Pamella R Adongo, Paul Oboth, Felister Apili, Edward Kumakech, Samuel Owusu-Sekyere, Julius N Wandabwa","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07322-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of clinical simulation in Uganda is still low. Experiences regarding the use of simulation in low-resource settings like Uganda have not been widely explored. We aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of students and faculty regarding simulation in teaching undergraduate students.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted at Busitema and Lira Universities in Uganda. We conducted 20 in-depth interviews with the faculty staff and 10 focus group discussions with undergraduate Nursing, Midwifery, Medical and Anesthesia students. Braun and Clarke's interpretative, situated and pragmatic framework was used in sample size determination. We obtained ethical clearance for the study. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified three themes from the data:1) Variable conceptualization of simulation 2) Concerns about realism; and 3) Perceived benefits of simulation. Some viewed simulation as unrealistic, while others thought it felt like a real clinical experience. Simulation was perceived to be more idealistic because it had all the equipment for simulation which differed from the clinical settings which may sometimes lack critical equipment. Simulation was perceived to provide room for mistakes and immediate feedback, boost confidence and self-efficacy, enhance clinical competence, enhance interpersonal behavioral skills, and be more practical. It was seen to prepare students for clinical placement. Although simulation was considered readily convenient and accessible for students, concerns were raised regarding the relevance of simulation in a setting with a high volume of patients for students learning. Divergent views were expressed regarding the transferability of skills from simulation to clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students perceived simulation to be beneficial for their learning. However, concerns about the realism, relevance, and transferability of skills from simulation to clinical settings were noted. Clarifying preconceived notions against the use of simulation will enhance its utilisation in educational settings where simulation is not readily embraced.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and perceptions of students and faculty with clinical simulation in Uganda: an exploratory study.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Epuitai, Pamella R Adongo, Paul Oboth, Felister Apili, Edward Kumakech, Samuel Owusu-Sekyere, Julius N Wandabwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07322-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of clinical simulation in Uganda is still low. Experiences regarding the use of simulation in low-resource settings like Uganda have not been widely explored. We aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of students and faculty regarding simulation in teaching undergraduate students.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted at Busitema and Lira Universities in Uganda. We conducted 20 in-depth interviews with the faculty staff and 10 focus group discussions with undergraduate Nursing, Midwifery, Medical and Anesthesia students. Braun and Clarke's interpretative, situated and pragmatic framework was used in sample size determination. We obtained ethical clearance for the study. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified three themes from the data:1) Variable conceptualization of simulation 2) Concerns about realism; and 3) Perceived benefits of simulation. Some viewed simulation as unrealistic, while others thought it felt like a real clinical experience. Simulation was perceived to be more idealistic because it had all the equipment for simulation which differed from the clinical settings which may sometimes lack critical equipment. Simulation was perceived to provide room for mistakes and immediate feedback, boost confidence and self-efficacy, enhance clinical competence, enhance interpersonal behavioral skills, and be more practical. It was seen to prepare students for clinical placement. Although simulation was considered readily convenient and accessible for students, concerns were raised regarding the relevance of simulation in a setting with a high volume of patients for students learning. Divergent views were expressed regarding the transferability of skills from simulation to clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students perceived simulation to be beneficial for their learning. However, concerns about the realism, relevance, and transferability of skills from simulation to clinical settings were noted. Clarifying preconceived notions against the use of simulation will enhance its utilisation in educational settings where simulation is not readily embraced.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07322-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07322-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:临床模拟的使用在乌干达仍然很低。在乌干达等资源匮乏的环境中使用模拟的经验尚未得到广泛探索。我们的目的是探索学生和教师在本科教学中对模拟的经验和看法。材料和方法:该研究在乌干达的Busitema和Lira大学进行。我们与教职工进行了20次深度访谈,并与护理、助产、医学和麻醉专业的本科生进行了10次焦点小组讨论。Braun和Clarke的解释性、情境性和语用性框架被用于样本量的确定。我们获得了这项研究的伦理许可。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。我们从数据中确定了三个主题:1)模拟的可变概念化;2)对现实性的关注;3)模拟的感知收益。有些人认为模拟是不现实的,而另一些人则认为这感觉像是真实的临床体验。模拟被认为是更理想的,因为它有所有的模拟设备,不同于临床设置,有时可能缺乏关键设备。模拟被认为为错误和即时反馈提供了空间,增强了信心和自我效能,提高了临床能力,提高了人际行为技能,并且更实用。它被认为是为学生的临床实习做准备。虽然模拟被认为对学生来说很方便,也很容易获得,但人们对模拟在大量患者的环境中与学生学习的相关性提出了担忧。关于技能从模拟到临床设置的可转移性,表达了不同的观点。结论:学生认为模拟对他们的学习是有益的。然而,对现实主义的关注,相关性,以及技能从模拟到临床设置的可转移性。澄清反对使用模拟的先入为主的观念,将提高模拟在不容易接受的教育环境中的应用。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences and perceptions of students and faculty with clinical simulation in Uganda: an exploratory study.

Introduction: The use of clinical simulation in Uganda is still low. Experiences regarding the use of simulation in low-resource settings like Uganda have not been widely explored. We aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of students and faculty regarding simulation in teaching undergraduate students.

Materials and methods: The study was conducted at Busitema and Lira Universities in Uganda. We conducted 20 in-depth interviews with the faculty staff and 10 focus group discussions with undergraduate Nursing, Midwifery, Medical and Anesthesia students. Braun and Clarke's interpretative, situated and pragmatic framework was used in sample size determination. We obtained ethical clearance for the study. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

Findings: We identified three themes from the data:1) Variable conceptualization of simulation 2) Concerns about realism; and 3) Perceived benefits of simulation. Some viewed simulation as unrealistic, while others thought it felt like a real clinical experience. Simulation was perceived to be more idealistic because it had all the equipment for simulation which differed from the clinical settings which may sometimes lack critical equipment. Simulation was perceived to provide room for mistakes and immediate feedback, boost confidence and self-efficacy, enhance clinical competence, enhance interpersonal behavioral skills, and be more practical. It was seen to prepare students for clinical placement. Although simulation was considered readily convenient and accessible for students, concerns were raised regarding the relevance of simulation in a setting with a high volume of patients for students learning. Divergent views were expressed regarding the transferability of skills from simulation to clinical settings.

Conclusion: Students perceived simulation to be beneficial for their learning. However, concerns about the realism, relevance, and transferability of skills from simulation to clinical settings were noted. Clarifying preconceived notions against the use of simulation will enhance its utilisation in educational settings where simulation is not readily embraced.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信